Advancements in treating the unstable elbow. We will review and discuss the kinematics and biomechanics of the forearm, concentrating on the role of soft tissue structures and how they affect forearm and elbow function. During this session, we will review the latest techniques for treating the terrible triad, including solutions to complex injuries of the olecranon, coronoid, and radial head. Techniques presented will address fixation, reconstruction, and salvaging of complex unstable elbow injuries.

In the past, the treatment of acute elbow fracture-dislocations has emphasized repair to the medial collateral ligament (MCL), with favorable results. We report improved results using a strategy based on lateral-sided repair (lateral collateral ligament, radial head, coronoid) without MCL repair. In forty-seven patients, this strategy resulted in a high degree of success with no residual instability (valgus or otherwise). The dynamic stabilizers of the elbow activated through early postoperative motion, are important adjunct to stability. We have devised a reproducible radiographic method to demonstrate this.

To review the surgical treatment of elbow dislocations without surgical MCL repair, and to determine if early active motion aids in restoring stability and concentric joint reduction.

In the setting of acute fracture-dislocation of the elbow, concentric elbow stability with excellent functional results can be achieved using laterally-based surgical strategy without MCL repair. The dynamic stabilizers of the elbow, activated through the early motion, assist in providing joint congruity and stability.

Forty-seven patients with acute elbow fracture-dislocations requiring operative treatment were treated at two university-affiliated teaching hospitals and evaluated an average of twenty-one months after injury. The protocol consisted of repair of the ulna and coronoid, repair or replacement of the radial head, and repair of the LCL, and early motion. The MCL was not routinely repaired. The LCL origin had been avulsed and reattached in all patients. One patient had a second procedure related to malpositioned radial head prosthesis. A stable mobile (average one hundred and one degree arc) articulation was restored in all patients. There was no evidence of valgus instability in any patient. Early motion was initiated at a mean of two weeks postoperatively. Postoperative ulnohumeral joint space opening improved from 4.9 ± 1.2 mm in the early postoperative period to 2.0 ± 0.5 mm (p < 0.00003) at final follow-up. We believe this is due to the effect of the dynamic stabilizers, which were allowed to function through early motion.

In the treatment of acute elbow dislocation promising clinical results have been reported on articulated external fixation and surgical reconstruction of major joint stabilizers. However, it remains unclear whether or not surgical reconstruction of the major joint stabilizers sufficiently stabilizes the elbow joint or if augmentation by a hinged elbow fixator is beneficial to provide early stability and motion capacity. The aim of the present study was to compare the stabilizing potential of surgical reconstruction versus augmentation by a hinged external elbow in a model of sequentially induced intability of the elbow.

Materials and Methods: 8 unpreserved human upper extremities were mounted to a testing apparatus which was integrated within a material testing machine. In a first series, varus and valgus moments were induced to the intact elbow joint at full extension, as well as at 30°, 60°, 90° and 120° of flexion and the mean angular displacement at 2.5, 5, an 7.5 Nm was calculated. Instability was then induced by sequentially dissecting the lateral and the medial collateral ligament, the radial head, and the posterior capsule. The elbow joint was then sequentially restabilized by osteosynthesis of the radial head and refixation of the lateral and medial collateral ligament using bone anchors. In each sequence, elbow stability was tested with and without augmentation by a hinged external fixator according to the first testing series described above. Biomechanical data of surgical reconstruction alone and surgical reconstruction augmented by external fixation were compared using an analysis of variance.

Results: In the intact elbow, varus-valgus displacement with 7.5 Nm ranged from 8,3 ± 2,4° (0°) to 11,4 ± 4,2° (90°). With the fixator applied, varus-valgus displacement was significantly lower and ranged from 4,2 ± 1,3° (0°) to 5,3 ± 2,2° (90°). After complete destabilization of the elbow joint, maximum varus-valgus displacement ranged from 17,4 ± 5,3° (0°) to 23,6 ± 6,4° (90°). Subsequent reconstruction of the collateral ligaments, the posterior capsule, and the radial head proved to stabilize the elbow joint compared with the unstable situation, however, mean varus-valgus displacement remained significantly higher when compared to the intact elbow joint. During each sequence of instability, the hinged external fixator provided constant stability not significantly different to the intact elbow joint while guiding the elbow through the entire range of motion.

Conclusion: The stabilizing potential of surgical reconstruction alone is inferior to augmentation of a hinged external elbow fixator. In order to proved primary stability and early motion capacity, augmentation of a hinged external elbow fixator in the treatment of acute dislocation of the elbow is recommended.

Purpose. Assess and report the functional and post-operative outcomes of complex acute radial head fractures with elbow instability treated by arthroplasty using an uncemented modular anatomic prosthesis. Methods. Over a 3-year period (2007–2010), 21 patients (mean age 51.9 years) were treated primarily with modular radial head arthroplasty (mean follow up of 27.1 months). Data was collected retrospectively using clinical notes, operation documentation and prospectively using validated scoring systems namely the Oxford Elbow Index, Quick DASH and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score. Associated elbow fractures, ligamentous injury and short to mid term post-operative outcomes including radiographic assessment were recorded. Results. The mean Oxford Elbow Score was 34.80 (range 20–48). The mean Quick Dash score was 26.01 (range 0–68.2). The Mayo Performance score showed 6 scored excellent, 5 scored good, 3 scored fair and 2 scored poor. Regarding post-operative outcomes, 1 patient had a radial head dislocation, 1 patient had prosthesis removal for ongoing pain and 1 patient had a total elbow replacement due to associated proximal ulna fracture non-union. 11 patients had an associated ligamentous injury of which 6 had an associated coronoid fracture. Of note, 7 patient's radiographs showed early signs of implant loosening; this was mainly asymptomatic. Conclusions. With regard to complex radial head fractures with elbow instability, patient outcome measures showed good functionality and overall patient satisfaction despite radiographic evidence of loosening. Post-operative complication rates were low. These findings support the use of this radial head prosthesis in arthoplasty surgery for the treatment of complex acute radial head fractures with elbow instability

Aims: Tension band wiring is a widely accepted method for internal þxation of olecranon fractures. Plate þxation is suggested for the more complex olecranon fractures, but little is known about the speciþc risk factors for failure of tension band wiring. The aim of this study was to analyze the inßuence of fracture comminution, associated elbow instability and fracture extension into the coronoid process on the outcome of tension band wiring for olecranon fractures. Methods: From 1996 to 1998, forty-four olecranon fractures were treated consecutively at out institution using tension band wiring. All patients returned for a clinical and radiographic exam performed by two observers independent of the treating surgeon. Pain and satisfaction were determined using visual-analogue scales (VAS) and clinical results were graded using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and the DASH questionnaire. Patients were followed for 3 to 6 years. Results: At most recent follow-up, the mean VAS score for pain was 2.0, mean extension was 3.6û and mean ßexion was 137.2û. According to the MEPS the results were graded as good or excellent in 78% of the patients. Five patients were disabled for activities of daily living according to the DASH questionnaire. All but one fracture healed. Fracture comminution did not affect the outcome. Worse results were associated with elbow instability and fracture extension into the coronoid. Conclusions: Tension band wiring provided satisfactory results for the treatment of olecranon fractures in the presence of fracture comminution, but worse results were obtained in the presence of elbow instability and fracture extension into the coronoid

Postero-lateral rotator instability (PLRI) is the most common pattern of recurrent elbow instability. Unfortunately, current imaging to aid PLRI diagnosis is limited. We have developed an ultrasound (US) technique to measure ulnohumeral joint gap with and without stress of the lateral ulnocollateral ligament. We sought to define lateral ulnohumeral joint gap measurements in the resting and stressed state to provide insight into how US may aid diagnosis of PLRI. Sixteen elbows were evaluated in eight healthy volunteers. Lateral ulnohumeral gap was measured on US in the resting position and with posterolateral drawer stress test maneuver applied. Joint laxity was calculated as the difference between stress and rest conditions. Measurements were performed by two independent readers with comparison performed between stress and rest positions. A highly significant difference in ulnohumeral gap was seen between stress and rest conditions (Reader 1: p < 0 .0001 and Reader 2: p=0.0002) with median values of 2.93 mm and 2.50 mm at rest and 3.92 mm and 3.40 mm at stress for Reader 1 and 2 respectively. Median joint laxity was 1.02 mm and 0.74 mm respectively for each reader. Correlation and agreement between readers was good. This study provides key new insight into use of US for diagnosis as PLRI as it defines normal ulnohumeral distances and demonstrates widening when applying the posterolateral drawer stress maneuver. Further evaluation of this technique is required in patients with PLRI

In the setting of traumatic elbow injuries involving coronoid fractures, the relative size of the coronoid fragment has been shown to relate to the stability of the joint. Currently, the challenge lies in accurately classifying the amount of bone loss in coronoid fractures. In comminuted fractures, bone loss is difficult to measure with plain radiographs or computed tomography. The purpose of this study is to describe a novel radiographic measure, the Coronoid Opening Angle (COA), on lateral elbow radiographs. We demonstrate the relationship of the COA to coronoid height and describe how this measure can be used to estimate bone loss and potentially predict elbow instability following coronoid fracture. Radiographs were drawn from a regional database in a consecutive fashion. Candidate radiographs were excluded on the basis of radiographic evidence of degenerative changes, previous surgery or injury, bony deformity, and inadequate lateral view of the elbow. The COA was measured as the angle between the long axis of the ulna at the level of the trochlear notch, and the tip of coronoid, from a common origin at the posterior cortex of the olecranon. Images were reviewed by a fellowship trained upper extremity surgeon, an upper extremity fellow, and a junior resident. Normal COA, coronoid height, and calculated COA at varying amounts of bone loss were calculated by three reviewers. A sensitivity analysis was performed to determine how the COA can most effectively predict bone loss at varying coronoid heights. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated for 39 subjects. Seventy-two subjects were included for analysis (M=40, F=32). The normal coronoid opening angle is 33.19 degrees [32.2 – 34.2]. Coronoid height is 18.8 mm [18.1 – 19.6]. Extrapolating this baseline data, the COA at 20%, 33%, and 50% of coronoid bone loss was calculated to be 27.5, 23.5, and 18 degrees, respectively. ICC was found to be 0.90 or higher. Cutoff values were determined to maximize the sensitivity of the COA. A cutoff value of 21 degrees has a 92% sensitivity in detecting a minimum of 50% bone loss. The COA with similar sensitivity in predicting 20% and 33% bone loss are 32 and 27 degrees. The coronoid opening angle is a novel technique that can be used on a lateral elbow radiograph to predict the minimum coronoid bone loss. This can be used to guide clinical decision making and potentially predict instability. Future research will aim to validate this tool in the clinical setting in predicting instability

Hinged external fixators of the elbow joint can be a valuable tool in managing complicated trauma associated with instability, instability after contracture release, and distraction interposition arthroplasty or distraction arthroplasty alone. This retrospective study focuses on the performance of the device in acute and chronic elbow instability associated with complex injuries around the elbow. Thirteen hinged external fixators were applied in 13 patients with an average age of 46 years. All fixators were applied for various types of fractures around the elbow joint associated with elbow dislocation. In 12 patients prior to the application of the fixator, a formal open reduction and internal fixation was performed so as to neutralise the whole construct and permit early mobilisation of the joint. In one patient with a minimally displaced fracture which required no internal fixation the fixator was used to permit early mobilisation. A circular multiplanar frame was used in 4 patients and a unilateral one in the rest of them. Eight out of 13 patients with fracture-dislocation had an uneventful outcome. Three patients required a revision surgery to correct a fracture malalignment and a subluxation of the joint. The results were evaluated according to the Mayo Elbow Performance score. Complications included 4 cases of pin tract infection and 2 of transient ulnar neuritis. Despite the complexity of its application and the complications that may follow such device, an articulating external fixator can be a valuable tool in treating complex elbow instability

The role of anconeus in elbow stability has been a long-standing debate. Anatomical and electromyographic studies have suggested a potential role as a stabilizer. However, to our knowledge, no clinical or biomechanical studies have investigated its role in improving the stability of a lateral collateral ligament (LCL) deficient elbow. Seven cadaveric upper extremities were mounted in an elbow motion simulator in the varus position. An LCL injured model was created by sectioning of the common extensor origin, and the LCL. The anconeus tendon and its aponeurosis were sutured in a Krackow fashion and tensioned to 10N and 20N through a transosseous tunnel at its origin. Varus-valgus angles and ulnohumeral rotations were recorded using an electromagnetic tracking system during simulated active elbow flexion with the forearm pronated and supinated. During active motion, the injured model resulted in a significant increase in varus angulation (5.3°±2.9°, P=.0001 pronation, 3.5°±3.4°, P=.001 supination) and external rotation (ER) (8.6°±5.8°, P=.001 pronation, 7.1°±6.1°, P=.003 supination) of the ulnohumeral articulation compared to the control state (varus angle −2.8°±3.4° pronation, −3.3°±3.2° supination, ER angle 2.1°±5.6° pronation, 1.6°±5.8° supination). Tensioning of the anconeus significantly decreased the varus angulation (−1.2°±4.5°, P=.006 for 10N in pronation, −3.9°±4°, P=.0001 for 20N in pronation, −4.3°±4°, P=.0001 for 10N in supination, −5.3°±4.2°, P=.0001 for 20N in supination) and ER angle (2.6°±4.5°, P=.008 for 10N in pronation, 0.3°±5°, P=.0001 for 20N in pronation, 0.1°±5.3°, P=.0001 for 10N in supination, −0.8°±5.3°, P=.0001 for 20N in supination) of the injured elbow. Comparing anconeus tensioning to the control state, there was no significant difference in varus-valgus angulation except with anconeus tensioning to 20N with the forearm in supination which resulted in less varus angulation (P=1 for 10N in pronation, P=.267 for 20N in pronation, P=.604 for 10N in supination, P=.030 for 20N in supination). Although there were statistically significant differences in ulnohumeral rotation between anconeus tensioning and the control state (except with anconeus tensioning to 10N with the forearm in pronation which was not significantly different), anconeus tensioning resulted in decreased external rotation angle compared to the control state (P=1 for 10N in pronation, P=.020 for 20N in pronation, P=.033 for 10N in supination, P=.001 for 20N in supination). In the highly unstable varus elbow orientation, anconeus tensioning restores the in vitro stability of an LCL deficient elbow during simulated active motion with the forearm in both pronation and supination. Interestingly, there was a significant difference in varus-valgus angulation between 20N anconeus tensioning with the forearm supinated and the control state, with less varus angulation for the anconeus tensioning which suggests that loads less than 20N is sufficient to restore varus stability during active motion with the forearm supinated. Similarly, the significant difference observed in ulnohumeral rotation between anconeus tensioning and the control state suggests that lesser degrees of anconeus tensioning would be sufficient to restore the posterolateral instability of an LCL deficient elbow. These results may have several clinical implications such as a potential role for anconeus strengthening in managing symptomatic lateral elbow instability

The October 2013 Children’s orthopaedics Roundup. 360. looks at: Half a century of Pavlik treatment; Step away from the child!: trends in fracture management; Posterolateral rotatory elbow instability in children; Osteochondral lesions undiagnosed in patellar dislocations; Oral bisphosphonates in osteogenesis imperfecta; Crossed or parallel pins in supracondylar fractures?; Not too late nor too early: getting epiphysiodesis right; Fixation of supramalleolar osteotomies

Aims

The ulna is an extremely rare location for primary bone tumours of the elbow in paediatrics. Although several reconstruction options are available, the optimal reconstruction method is still unknown due to the rarity of proximal ulna tumours. In this study, we report the outcomes of osteoarticular ulna allograft for the reconstruction of proximal ulna tumours.

Posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI) is the most common type of elbow instability. It is caused by an insufficiency of the lateral ligamentous complex, which consists mainly of the radial collateral ligament (RCL) and the lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL). Investigate the influence of serial sectioning of the lateral ligamentous complex on elbow stability in a cadaveric model of PLRI. Kinematics of six fresh frozen cadaveric elbow specimens were measured by digitizing anatomical marks with a Microscribe 3DLX digitizing system (Revware Inc, Raleigh, NC). Each specimen was tested under four conditions: Intact, LUCL tear, LUCL and RCL tear, and complete Tear (LUCL, RCL and capsule tear). Each specimen was tested in 30°, 60° and 90° elbow flexion angles. Varus- laxity was measured in supination, pronation, and neutral forearm rotation positions and total forearm rotation was measured with 0.3 Nm of torque. Statistical significant differences between the conditions were detected using a two-way ANOVA with Tukey's post-hoc test. The radial head dislocated in all specimens in LUCL and RCL tear and Comp but not in LUCL tear. Total forearm ROM did not increase form intact to LUCL tear (p>0.05) but significantly increased in LUCL and RCL tear (p=0.0002) and complete tear (p<0.0001) in all flexion angles. Additionally, ROM in LUCL tear significantly differed from LUCL and RCL tear and complete tear (p=0.0027 and p=0.0002). A similar trend was seen with the varus angle. While there was a significant difference when the intact condition was compared to both the LUCLand RCL tear and complete tear conditions (p<0.0001 and p<0.0001), there was no difference between the intact and LUCL tear conditions. LUCL tear alone is not sufficient to cause instability and increase ROM and varus angle, meanwhile the increase of ROM and varus angle with additional capsular tear was not significant compared to LUCL and RCL tear. The increase of ROM after LUCL and RCL tear is an unknown symptom of PLRI

There is an increasing trend towards radial head replacement (RHR) or fixation for complex radial head fractures. These injuries are identified by grossly displaced fragments or elbow instability. The aim of this study was to examine the outcome of a surgical protocol that emphasised delayed radial-head excision (RHE) as the procedure of choice. When the humero-ulnar joint was congruent, intervention was delayed 10 to 14 days to allow time for ligamentous healing. RHR was performed if instability was demonstrated on-table. A retrospective study was performed to identify the outcome of patients undergoing surgery for a radial head fracture between 2008 and 2014. There were 18 Mason Type III and 18 Mason Type IV injuries. There was an associated coronoid fracture in 17 patients. RHE was performed in 28 patients, of which the reoperation rate was 2 (7.1%). RHR was performed in 15 patients, of whom 4 (27%) had reintervention. RHR was most common in the Type III coronoid fractures. The cumulative reoperation rate was 9.3% at six months and 15.4% at two years. The median Oxford Elbow Score (OES) was 85.4 (IQR 73.4 to 99.5). Time from injury was the only predictor of the Oxford Elbow Score (p=0.04). This surgical protocol resulted in a reduced need for RHR, a low reintervention rate, and satisfactory function. RHR should be reserved for cases where stability cannot be achieved on-table. Stability can be maximised by delaying RHE until early ligamentous healing occurs

Aims

The aim of this study is to report the implant survival and factors associated with revision of total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) using data from the Dutch national registry.

Aims

The conventionally described mechanism of distal biceps tendon rupture (DBTR) is of a ‘considerable extension force suddenly applied to a resisting, actively flexed forearm’. This has been commonly paraphrased as an ‘eccentric contracture to a flexed elbow’. Both definitions have been frequently used in the literature with little objective analysis or citation. The aim of the present study was to use video footage of real time distal biceps ruptures to revisit and objectively define the mechanism of injury.

Radial head fractures are the most common fractures occurring around the elbow and are often associated with other fractures or soft tissue injuries in the elbow. The purpose of this study was to characterise the morphology and to evaluate the outcome of the surgical management of radial head fractures in complex elbow injuries. Nineteen patients with this pattern of injury underwent surgical treatment in our unit. In addition, seven patients had posterior dislocation of the elbow, 2 medial collateral ligament rupture, one capitellar fracture, 3 posterior Monteggia, 1 Essex-Lopresti lesion and 5 coronoid fracture plus posterior dislocation. Non comminuted radial head fractures were treated by open reduction and internal fixation or simple excision of small fragments. Patients with comminuted, displaced radial head fractures underwent radial head replacement. The average follow up was 44 months. Two patients developed post-traumatic elbow contractures, one elbow instability and 2 mild arthritis. Overall, according to the DASH Outcome Measure, the results were excellent in 12 patients, fair in 3 and poor in 4. In complex injuries of the elbow the characteristics of the radial head fracture and in particular the comminution, the fragment number, the displacement as well as the age of the patient should determine the appropriate surgical technique which will lead to satisfactory long-term results. Anatomical restoration and maintenance of elbow stability will allow early mobilisation of the elbow joint and should be the goals of surgical management

Between 1997 and 2005, 10 patients with chronic instability of the elbow underwent surgical stabilisation. There were 5 men and 6 women with a mean age of 41 years (16 to 58). All patients had initially dislocated the elbow at a mean of 5.6 years (6 months to 25 years) prior to surgical reconstruction. There were 8 chronic lateral and 2 medial reconstructions performed. The presenting symptoms, findings on clinical examination and methods of surgical reconstruction are defined. Two patients underwent reconstruction using an artificial ligament (Corin) as they had evidence of ligamentous laxity and at the time of assessment all the other patients had been treated using autografts. At a mean follow up of 3 years (1 to 6 years) all patients except one reported no symptoms of pain or instability and had been able to return to their normal work and social activity. The one patient with persisting elbow instability had Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and underwent a second revision procedure again using an artificial ligament (Corin). This review represents our surgical experience and functional outcomes with this rare form of ligamentous elbow injury

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the beneficial effects of elbow arthrolysis. This was a prospective study on 88 patients with post-traumatic elbow stiffness with a mean follow-up of 51 months (1 year - 11 years), who had failed to improve their range of movement at a mimimum period of 6 months after their injury. All patients had an open arthrolysis. Post-operatively patients received continuous passive movement (CPM) for 48 to 72 hours. This was facilitated by good analgesia afforded by a continuous brachial plexus block. All patients received no physiotherapy thereafter and were advised to actively mobilise their elbow. ROM was assessed using a goniometer and function assessed using the Mayo elbow performance index. The ROM improved from a mean of 56 degrees pre-operatively to 106 degrees post-operatively. This improvement in ROM was reflected in the improvement of pre-operative flexion from 107 to 138 degrees and improvement of extension from 60 to 31 degrees. Function improved from a mean of 65 to 85 on the Mayo elbow performance score. 95% of the patients were satisfied with the outcome. Complications included ulnar nerve paraesthesia in 3 patients, 1 triceps avulsion and 1 superficial infection. 3 patients required a manipulation of the elbow in the postoperative period. This was performed within 2 weeks of the operation. There were no cases of elbow instability or heterotopic ossification in this series. Conclusion: Open elbow arthrolysis combined with continuous brachial plexus block and CPM in the postoperative period is a safe, reliable and durable procedure for improving ROM and function in patients with post-traumatic elbow stiffness

Aim: We prove the importance of the medial ligamentary system of the elbow for its stability and the usefulness of the ligamentoplasty by palmaris longus tendon as reconstructive technique. Methods and patients: 9 patients aged between 17 and 58 (17,18,28,32,35,38,40,56,58,), 6 male, 3 female suffered the following injuries:1)elbow luxation or sub-luxation with rupture of the medial collateral elbow ligament, associated with: 1)Forearm bone fractures, 2)Ulnar nerve pulsy, 3)fracture of the coronoidal process, 4)Fracture of the radius head, 5)fracture of the humerus with radial and musculocutaneous nerve pulsy. The lesions happened since 2 week, 2 month and 2 yrs respectively. The 17 yrs old young man was injured during a weightlifting championship game and the next 4 suffered traffic and work accidents, while the 18 yrs old last one suffered an iatrogenic ligamentary lesion, the rest of the lesions have been caused to work accidents or to motor vehicle accidents. All patients were operated by ligamentoplasty with palmaris longus by medial incision, fenestration of the medial epicondyl and olecranon and transoseus pivoting of the palmaris longus which was enforced by 2 anchor sutures. An elbow flexion-extension functional splint was applied postoperatively, initially fixated between 110–85 degrees. The splint was removed 2 months postoperatively, while full rang of motion has been obtained. Results: Follow up was between 6 and 18 month. The 16 yrs old boy return in full sport activity and obtained at the elbow joint full range of motion. the second –young man-patient presents an extension defect of 15 degrees and the 56 yrs old women has a 25degreed deficit of both extension and flexion but she continues the therapy program. Conclusion: The medial ligamentary system lesion with elbow instability must be repaired by medial ligamentoplasty and the well done technique followed by correct therapy program improved results

Purpose: Metal radial head arthroplasty is a proven technique for the treatment of complex radial head fractures. Little previous research is available on the utility and longevity of metal radial head arthroplasty for elbow reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional outcome of patients with metal radial head arthroplasty (RHA) for elbow reconstruction. Methods: This was a retrospective review from one institution with three senior orthopaedic surgeons. 23 consecutive patients with 23 RHA were included in the study, 4 patients were lost to follow up. RHA was performed for conditions of rheumatoid arthritis, post traumatic radial head nonunion, post traumatic radial head malunion, elbow instability following previous radial head excision and failed silicone radial head implants. Patients were excluded from the study if they were treated for an acute injury with RHA (under 2 months from injury). There were 8 males and 15 females with a minimum of 2 year follow up. Analysis included chart review, personal interview, physical examination, radiographs and strength testing. Region specific questionnaires were used including: DASH, ASES, MEPI, PRWE, WOS and SF-36. Mean follow up was 9 yrs. Results: Mayo elbow performance scores were excellent in 11 patients, good in 4 patients, fair in 4 patients and poor in 4 patients. Subjective patient satisfaction was averaged at 8.4 out of 10. Patients demonstrated significantly less isometric strength and grip strength in the affected versed unaffected elbow. There was no statistically significant difference seen in ulnar variance or ulnohumeral joint space between the affected and unaffected limbs. Conclusions: In conclusion, RHA for elbow reconstruction is a safe procedure that provides patients with long term functional ROM and pain relief