Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 1, Issue 9 | Pages 576 - 584
18 Sep 2020
Sun Z Liu W Li J Fan C

Post-traumatic elbow stiffness is a disabling condition that remains challenging for upper limb surgeons. Open elbow arthrolysis is commonly used for the treatment of stiff elbow when conservative therapy has failed. Multiple questions commonly arise from surgeons who deal with this disease. These include whether the patient has post-traumatic stiff elbow, how to evaluate the problem, when surgery is appropriate, how to perform an excellent arthrolysis, what the optimal postoperative rehabilitation is, and how to prevent or reduce the incidence of complications. Following these questions, this review provides an update and overview of post-traumatic elbow stiffness with respect to the diagnosis, preoperative evaluation, arthrolysis strategies, postoperative rehabilitation, and prevention of complications, aiming to provide a complete diagnosis and treatment path.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-9:576–584.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 88-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 434 - 434
1 Oct 2006
Sharma H Maheshwari R Wilson N
Full Access

Introduction: There remains little evidence to discern whether K-wires or screws have different outcomes in the management of lateral condylar mass (LCM) fractures in children. We studied 77 displaced (Jacob types II and III) fractures of the lateral humeral condyle in 77 children in order to infer the relative benefit of one strategy over another. Materials and methods: Between 1995 and 2005, we identified 77 LCM fractures in the departmental database. Information was collected from theatre-charts, casenotes and radiographs. We analysed demographic data, fracture features, treatment modalities, complications, and clinical and radiographic results. We excluded all complex LCM associated with elbow dislocations, olecranon fractures and bi-condylar fractures. The mean follow-up was 5.3 months (range, 6 weeks to 3 years). Results: We reviewed the results of screw osteosynthesis (n=44) versus K-wire (n=33) at an average age of 5.3 years (range, 8 months to 10.9 years). There were 49 boys and 28 girls. The average interval between the injury and the operation was 1.6 days. The mean duration of implant removal was 3.6 weeks (for K-wires, removed without anaesthesia) and 20.7 weeks (for screws, removed under general anaesthesia). There was no non-union in this series. None of the patient needed a revision of osteosynthesis. Superficial wound infection (all K-wires) was found in three patients, which was completely settled with antibiotic therapy. One patient had cubitus valgus deformity (screw), which required a corrective osteotomy. Loss of range of motion of 10–50° was found in 6 cases (3 in each group). Conclusions: Based on our observations, we believe that K-wire fixation had comparatively similar outcome to screw fixation, although, this necessitates a second procedure for removal of screw