Aims: To demonstrate that the double incision technique produces a signiþcant reduction in pillar pain and an earlier return to work. Methods: A randomised controlled trial of twenty-four patients (32 wrists), 18 wrists being allocated to the single incision group (S) and 14 to the double incision group (D), was carried out between 1996 and 1999, after clinical evaluation and complimentary EMG studies. Mean ages were 49.6 (32 to 69) and 45.8 (30 to 54) in the S and D groups respectively. Results: There was a difference in pillar pain in the two groups, being signiþcantly less in the D group (Chi-squared = 8.22) (P = 0.004). There were also differences in the return to work, being much less in Group D Ð Mean = 2.6 weeks (1 to 12) cf. 5.6 weeks (2 to 16). (Willcoxon Rank Sum Test P = 0.0004). There were no differences in the post-operative clinical symptoms (P > 0.05), scar sensitivity (Chi-squared = 1.025) (P = 0.506) or grip strength (P =0.506). The tourniquet time was longer for the double incision technique D = 15.3 minutes (12 to18) cf. S = 12.2 minutes (10 to 18). Conclusions: The Double incision technique is a simple and safe procedure for uncomplicated carpal tunnel syndrome, producing a signiþcant reduction in pillar pain and and earlier post-operative rehabilitation and an earlier return to work

A randomised controlled trial involving 24 patients ( 32 wrists ), 18 wrists being allocated to the single incision group ( S ) and 14 to the double incision group ( D ), was carried out between 1996 and 1999, after clinical evaluation and complimentary EMG studies. Randomisation was performed by one of the orthopaedic secretaries using an envelope technique on the morning of admission. Mean ages were 49.6 ( 32 to 69 ) and 45.8 ( 30 to 54 ) in the S and D groups respectively. The male to female ratios were 2/12 and 5/7 respectively. The pre- and post-operative mass grip strength was measured by a Jamar dynanometer and assessment of post-operative parameters included pillar pain, scar sensitivity, nerve compression symptoms and return to work. Pillar pain was significantly less in Group D ( Chi-squared = 8.22; P = 0.004 ). Return to work was less in Group D ( average = 2.6 weeks ( 1 to 12 weeks )) cf. to Group S ( average = 5.6 weeks ( 2 to 16 weeks ) ). ( Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test P = 0.0004 ). No differences occurred in post-operative clinical symptoms ( P > 0.05 ), scar sensitivity ( Chi-squared = 1.025 ; P = 0.506 ) or mass grip strength ( P= 0.506 ). The tourniquet time was longer for the double incision technique ( average = 15.3 minutes ( 12 to 18 minutes )) cf. to the single incision technique ( average = 12.2 minutes ( average = 10 to 18 minutes )). The double incision technique is a safe and easy technique for uncomplicated carpal tunnel syndrome resulting in a significant reduction in pillar pain and a more rapid return to work

A series of 76 distal tibial pilon fractures treated with surgical fixation were retrospectively reviewed from case notes, plain radiographs and CT imaging. Patient demographics, injury and fracture patterns, methods and timing of fixation and clinical and radiological outcomes were assessed over a mean follow up period of 8.6 months (range 2–30). Definitive fixation was most commonly performed through an open technique (71 cases) with plate fixation. CT imaging was used to plan the most direct approach to access the fracture fragments. Single or double incision techniques were used to access the tibia, with fixation of the fibular performed when necessary. Superficial infection occurred in 5 cases (6.9%) and deep infection in 2 (2.8%). Aseptic wound breakdown occurred in 5 cases (6.9%). The rate of wound breakdown after three-incision technique was 37.5%. There were 10 cases of non-union (13.9%) and 8 of mal-union (10.5%). Post-traumatic arthritis was present on the most recent x ray in 17 cases (23.4%). Further surgery was required in 20 cases (27.8%), most commonly for metalwork related problems and also for treatment of non-union, post-traumatic arthritis and infection. This review gives comprehensive injury specific and surgical outcome data from one of the largest reported series of these complex and problematic injuries

Different approaches for minimally invasive implantation of hip TEPs are currently the subject of lively discussion. The technique presented here is a tissue-saving procedure, independent of the implants used, and considerably accelerates early patient rehabilitation. The paper describes the double incision version of the Yale method with its special anatomical features, in particular contrast to Berger’s technique (Chicago). It is possible to work under accurate visual guidance in the acetabular and shaft areas without an X-ray intensifier. The structures of the pelvic and trochanteric muscle origins as well as the iliotibial band remain completely intact. The results of the first implantations (n = 251) show shorter hospitalisation times, the possibility of muscle-compensated pelvic stabilisation on the first postoperative day, complete weight-bearing without crutches, reduced blood loss and the required EC substitution. The Merle d’Aubigne score both immediately after surgery and on completion of the follow-up rehabilitation shows higher values than conventional techniques. Analysis of the VAS shows considerably less postoperative pain than with conventional techniques. The peri- and postoperative complications are discussed. In summary, the Yale technique is a tissue-saving approach to the implantation of hip endoprostheses with pronounced advantages in early rehabilitation for the patient in the sense of immediate postoperative weight-bearing and muscular stabilisation of the pelvis and less pain

Purpose: To compare the results of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) using autologous patellar bone-tendon-bone (BTB) graft with four semitendinous-medial rectus bundles (STMR). Our technique involved a double incision and attachment with an interference screw. Materials and methods: Non-randomised prospective study of 296 athletes operated on between 1988 and 2001: 202 BTB and 94 STMR. The mean ages were 22.8 and 21.6, males 52.9% and 58.5%, right knee involved in 54.46% and 54.3% of cases and mean follow-up of 13.7 and 12.4 months in the BTB and STMR groups, respectively. The evaluation of the results was based on the IKDC protocol and pre- and post-surgical anterior tibial displacement was evaluated with the radiological Lachman test and Telos® arthrometer. Results: The final IKDC evaluation was excellent or good in 86% and 89%, post-surgery Lachman tests showed less than 3 mm in 58.6 and 50.6%, from 4 to 8 mm in 33.3% and 31.6%, the athlete dropping sports activity in 9.3 and 3.4%, infection in 3 and 2 cases, stiffness in 2 and 2 cases and discomfort on kneeling in 8.7 and 2.2% of athletes in the BTB and STMR groups, respectively. Conclusions: We found no clinical differences between the two procedures. Anteroposterior stability was better in the BTB group. There was less discomfort on kneeling and fewer athletes dropped sports in the STMR group

Introduction. Interest in platelet-derived growth factors has been increasing as an adjunct in surgical techniques for tissue repair. Its use in ligament injuries repair has been studied mainly in animals. The authors intend to study growth factors influence in ACL repair using BTB graft. Material. 20 individuals underwent ACL rupture BTB arthroscopic repair, using Double Incision Mini-Invasive Technique. MRI (3-Tesla) images. GPSIII ® System to obtain Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) thrombin activated. Methods. Prospective study consisting of 2 groups of 10 patients each. Surgical technique, fixation method and postoperative protocol were the same. In the study group (SG-10 patients) graft was imbued with PRP and the remaing plasma was intra-articularly injected. The MRIs took place 6 weeks and 6 months after the procedure with and without gadolinium-DTPA enhancement. Evaluation was performed blindly by independent radiologists concerning femoral tunnel integration, sinovialization process and nonspecific synovitis. Clinical and functional status evaluation: IKDC. Statistical analysis in SPSS®. Results. Radiological evaluation was similar in both groups. In the Study Group at 6 weeks we verified less joint effusion and synovitis. At 6 months: no diference in integration in femoral tunnel, and in granulation tissue around the femoral tunnel in graft sinovialization. IKDC (mean ± SD) with PRP: pre-operative −45,66 ±6,98, post-operative −94,35 ±3,54 (Age-29 ± 10), without PRP: preoperative −48,02 ±12,68, post-operative −91,7 ±6,99 (Age −31 ±10). There are no statistical differences between the groups with and without PRP in clinical and functional assessments and MRI images. Discussion. The use of technology to accelerate and improve the processes of tissue repair and integration is of great interest in repairing the ACL. Studies in humans are rare, with low level of evidence and contradictory results. Although the limitations of this study, it seems to us that the use of growth factors has no advantages in the process of PT graft integration at 6 months. Conclusion. PRP doesn't seem to contribute to enhancement of the ligamentation process and articular rehabilitation when used as a step of BTB technique

Proximal humeral fractures are common fractures that may lead to severe functional disability. In open reduction and internal fixation of these fractures deltopectoral approach is pereferred by many surgeons being an internervous plane and because of familiarity. However when this aprroach is used extensive soft tissue dissection is inevitable and control of the commonly displaced tuberculum majus fragment which is displaced posterolateraly is difficult. In this prospective study we compared deltopectoral and lateral deltoid splitting approach by using the same fixation material. Between October 2005 and March 2007 42 patients were included in the study group. In Group A a lateral deltoid split approch and in Group B deltopectoral approach was used. Group A consisted of 22 cases; mean age 60.95 (26–90 years old); 12 female and 10 male, Group B 20 cases; mean age 56.9 (24–86 years old); 13 female, 7 male. Philos locking plate fixation (Synthes) was used in every case. When deltoid split approach was used axillary nerve was explored and protected, a C-arm was used in every case. Functional results and compications were compared at the follow up visits. When radiological results were compared the reduction of head and tubercular fragments were better in deltoid splitting approach. The Constant score was better in Group A at an earlier time period 68.9 vs 58.4 (p< 0.01). At the 6th month follow up the difference between Constant scores was not significant, 85.9 vs 85.2 (p> 0.05). Axillary nerve lesion due to lateral deltoid split exposure was not observed in any of the cases. Lateral deltoid split exposure with identification and protection of the axillary nerve facilitates 270 degrees control of the head and tubercular fragments in AO/ASIF type B and C fractures. Additional fixation of tubercular fragments by sutures passed through cuff tendons and fixed to the plate helps to maintain the reduction. Compared to double incision minimal invasive approach a shother plate is used without any inadvertant risk to the axillary nerve. Better Constant scores are achieved at an earlier time. We recommend this technique in AO/ASIF type B and C fractures