Purpose and background

To explore the cost-utility of implementing stratified care for low back pain (LBP) in general practice, compared with usual care, within patient risk subgroups (low, medium and high risk of persistent disabling pain determined by the STarT Back tool).

Background: Alternative treatments in displaced fractures of the femoral neck include reduction and internal fixation, and arthroplasty. A variety of treatments are continuously introduced to the health care market and that makes prioritising, based on the severity of the disease, the effectiveness, and the cost effectiveness of the treatment, necessary. The aim of this study was to compare the estimated effect and costs of internal fixation and hemiarthroplasty after a displaced femoral neck fracture.

Methods: 222 patients, 165 (74%) women, mean age 83 years, were randomized to internal fixation (n = 112) and hemiarthroplasty (n = 110). Mainly due to cognitive failure or death, 56 patients failed to complete the EQ-5D questionnaire at any follow up; hence, 166 patients were included in the analysis. There were no differences in the demographic variables at inclusion. Patients underwent either a Charnley-Hastings bipolar cemented hemiarthroplasty or closed reduction and internal fixation with two parallel cannulated screws (Olmed). The health effect was estimated by the generic measure quality adjusted life-years (QALYs). The QALYs were estimated based on the patients’ perception of quality of life (QoL) assessed by Eq-5d, which was measured after 4, 12 and 24 months.

Results: Over the two year period the expected QALYs for patient with hemiarthroplasty and internal fixation were estimated to be 1.31 and 1.11, respectively. Thus, the incremental health effect, the difference in QALYs for hemiarthroplasty versus internal fixation, was 0.20 QALYs gained. Hospital costs over two years were € 30 726 in the internal fixation group and € 27 618 in the hemiarthroplasty group, an incremental cost of – € 3 108 in favor of hemiarthroplasty. Total costs, including societal costs, were € 62 815 in the internal fixation group, compared to € 48 227 in the hemiarthroplasty group, an incremental cost of – € 14 588 in favor of hemiarthroplasty. By dividing the incremental cost by the incremental effect, we found the incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) to be – € 15 540 for all hospital costs and – € 72 940 for total costs. Sensitivity analysis based on the bootstrap method, indicate that the ICER is significantly negative, indicating both a significantly lower incremental costs and significantly higher QALYs for hemiarthroplasty versus internal fixation. Conclusion: Primary treatment with hemiarthroplasty generates more QALYs and is less costly compared to internal fixation. Hemiarthroplasty was thus the cost effective treatment alternative.

Aims. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy versus physical therapy plus optional delayed arthroscopic partial meniscectomy in young patients aged under 45 years with traumatic meniscal tears. Methods. We conducted a multicentre, open-labelled, randomized controlled trial in patients aged 18 to 45 years, with a recent onset, traumatic, MRI-verified, isolated meniscal tear without knee osteoarthritis. Patients were randomized to arthroscopic partial meniscectomy or standardized physical therapy with an optional delayed arthroscopic partial meniscectomy after three months of follow-up. We performed a cost-utility analysis on the randomization groups to compare both treatments over a 24-month follow-up period. Cost utility was calculated as incremental costs per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy compared to physical therapy. Calculations were performed from a healthcare system perspective and a societal perspective. Results. A total of 100 patients were included: 49 were randomized to arthroscopic partial meniscectomy and 51 to physical therapy. In the physical therapy group, 21 patients (41%) received delayed arthroscopic partial meniscectomy during follow-up. Over 24 months, patients in the arthroscopic partial meniscectomy group had a mean 0.005 QALYs lower quality of life (95% confidence interval -0.13 to 0.14). The cost-utility ratio was €-160,000/QALY from the healthcare perspective and €-223,372/QALY from the societal perspective, indicating that arthroscopic partial meniscectomy incurs additional costs without any added health benefit. Conclusion. Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy is arthroscopic partial meniscectomy is unlikely to be cost-effective in treating young patients with isolated traumatic meniscal tears compared to physical therapy as a primary health intervention. Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy leads to a similar quality of life, but higher costs, compared to physical therapy plus optional delayed arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(11):1177–1183

Aims. A pragmatic multicentre randomized controlled trial, UK FROzen Shoulder Trial (UK FROST), was conducted in the UK NHS comparing the cost-effectiveness of commonly used treatments for adults with primary frozen shoulder in secondary care. Methods. A cost utility analysis from the NHS perspective was performed. Differences between manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA), arthroscopic capsular release (ACR), and early structured physiotherapy plus steroid injection (ESP) in costs (2018 GBP price base) and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) at one year were used to estimate the cost-effectiveness of the treatments using regression methods. Results. ACR was £1,734 more costly than ESP ((95% confidence intervals (CIs) £1,529 to £1,938)) and £1,457 more costly than MUA (95% CI £1,283 to £1,632). MUA was £276 (95% CI £66 to £487) more expensive than ESP. Overall, ACR had worse QALYs compared with MUA (-0.0293; 95% CI -0.0616 to 0.0030) and MUA had better QALYs compared with ESP (0.0396; 95% CI -0.0008 to 0.0800). At a £20,000 per QALY willingness-to-pay threshold, MUA had the highest probability of being cost-effective (0.8632) then ESP (0.1366) and ACR (0.0002). The results were robust to sensitivity analyses. Conclusion. While ESP was less costly, MUA was the most cost-effective option. ACR was not cost-effective. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(8):685–695

To determine the cost-effectiveness of Lumbar Total Disc Replacement (LTDR) with circumferential spinal fusion surgery. Cost utility analysis. We prospectively reviewed a cohort of 32 consecutive patients who underwent LTDR between 2004 and 2008 with a mean follow-up for 3.75 years. Identical data was compared to a similar group of patients (n=37) who underwent fusion in our institution. Oswestry Disability Index, visual analogue scale, quality of life (SF-36) and NHS resource use. Cost-effectiveness was measured by the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. QALY gains were estimated from SF-36 data using standard algorithms. There was no significant intergroup difference in the ODI, VAS and SF-36 pre and post-op. Both treatments produced statistically significant and equivalent improvements in mean health state utility at the 24-month follow-up (0.078 for LTDR, 0.087 for fusion). Costs were significantly lower with LTDR than with fusion due to a shorter mean procedure time (193.6 vs 377.4 minutes) and shorter length of stay (5.8 vs 7 days). The mean cost difference was £2,878 per patient. At 2 years, the cost per QALY gain of the lower-cost option (LTDR) was £48,892 although the cost effectiveness ratio would fall to below £30,000 if it is assumed that the patient benefits of LTDR last for at least 4 years. Both treatments led to significant improvements in patient outcomes which were sustained for at least 24 months. Costs were lower with LTDR which is effective and a more cost-effective alternative

Aims

The tibial component of total knee arthroplasty can either be an all-polyethylene (AP) implant or a metal-backed (MB) implant. This study aims to compare the five-year functional outcomes of AP tibial components to MB components in patients aged over 70 years. Secondary aims are to compare quality of life, implant survivorship, and cost-effectiveness.

Aims

The purpose was to compare operative treatment with a volar plate and nonoperative treatment of displaced distal radius fractures in patients aged 65 years and over in a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Aims

The aims of this study were to assess mapping models to predict the three-level version of EuroQoL five-dimension utility index (EQ-5D-3L) from the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and validate these before and after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Purpose. Using utilities and other outcome data collected prospectively on all SPRINT patients and cost data collected from a sample of SPRINT patients, we compared reamed and unreamed intramedullary nailing using a cost-utility analysis. Method. Participants completed the Health Utility Index 3 (HUI) questionnaire at two weeks after hospital discharge, and three, six, and 12 months post-surgery. We calculated quality adjusted life years (QALYs) for each patient for the first 12 months following intramedullary nailing. A convenience sample of 235 SPRINT patients with similar baseline characteristics provided data on healthcare resource utilization. Costs associated with the healthcare resource utilization were obtained from the 2008 Physicians Schedule of Benefits and a Case Costing System. Results. We found small, non-significant differences in QALYs for patients treated with reamed compared with unreamed intramedullary nails in both closed and open fractures: −0.017 (95% CI −0.021, 0.058) and −0.002 (95% CI −0.060, 0.062) respectively. The incremental costs for reamed compared with unreamed intramedullary nailing were $51 CAN (95% CI −$2,298, $2,400) in closed tibial fractures and $2,546 CAN (95% CI −$1,773, $6,864) in open tibial fractures. Conclusion. Considering point estimates only, reamed intramedullary nailing was less effective and more costly when compared to unreamed intramedullary nailing for both closed and open tibial fractures. Bootstrap simulations revealed that unreamed nailing was more likely to be cost-effective for both open and closed tibial fractures at all decision-making thresholds. Confidence intervals around both cost and utility estimates were wide and neither approached conventional levels of statistical significance

Aims

We present the development of a day-case total hip arthroplasty (THA) pathway in a UK National Health Service institution in conjunction with an extensive evidence-based summary of the interventions used to achieve successful day-case THA to which the protocol is founded upon.

Aims

With recent progress in cancer treatment, the number of advanced-age patients with spinal metastases has been increasing. It is important to clarify the influence of advanced age on outcomes following surgery for spinal metastases, especially with a focus on subjective health state values.

Aims

The rate of dislocation when traditional single bearing implants are used in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been reported to be between 8% and 10%. The use of dual mobility bearings can reduce this risk to between 0.5% and 2%. Dual mobility bearings are more expensive, and it is not clear if the additional clinical benefits constitute value for money for the payers. We aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of dual mobility compared with single bearings for patients undergoing revision THA.

The February 2015 Spine Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: Paracetamol use for lower back pain; En-bloc resection of vertebra reported for the first time; Spinopelvic disassociation under the spotlight; Hope for back pain; Disc replacement and ACDF equivalent in randomised study; Interspinous process devices ineffective