Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 20 of 773
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 85-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 143 - 143
1 Feb 2003
Maritz N Ligthelm L Lourens P Buys S Moolman Z
Full Access

Our retrospective study of 189 patients aimed to establish the efficacy of conservative treatment for rotator cuff impingement and also to assess the clinical presentation and the factors that influence the outcome. We noted patients’ response to physiotherapy and cortisone injections. We looked at the shape of the acromion and tried to correlate it with effectiveness of conservative treatment. All patients had either a positive Neer or Hawkins sign. In 123 patients internal rotation was markedly restricted. Subacromial cortisone injections were administered to 119 patients. The injection was repeated once in 52 patients and twice in 25. Surgery was necessary in 44 patients. In other words, conservative treatment was effective in 83%. Only 12 of the patients who underwent surgery had a Bigliani type-III acromion and only nine had a large spur. An appropriate exercise programme is critical if conservative treatment is to be effective. It should focus first on stretching the posterior capsule of the shoulder joint and increasing internal rotation, and subsequently on strengthening the subscapularis and infraspinatus muscles. We believe it is the imbalance of muscle power rather than the acromial spur that is the major cause of impingement


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 87-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 332 - 332
1 Sep 2005
Maritz N Ligthelm L Lourens P Buys S Moolman Z
Full Access

Introduction and Aims: To establish how effective conservative treatment is for rotator cuff impingement. To look at the clinical presentation and the factors that influences the outcome. Method: A retrospective study of 189 patients, who attended the Upper Limb Clinic, was done. The response to physiotherapy and cortisone injections was noted. We also looked at the shape of the acromion and tried to correlate it with effectiveness of conservative treatment. Results: All patients had either a positive Neer or Hawkins sign. What is more significant is that in 123 patients internal rotation was markedly restricted to the 10. th. dorsal vertebrae or less. One hundred and nineteen patients received a sub-acromial cortisone injection. It was repeated in 52 patients, and 25 patients received a third injection. Forty-four patients needed surgery. Therefore, conservative treatment was effective in 83% of cases. Of the group who was operated on, only nine patients had a large spur and only 12 patients had a Bigliani Type-III acromion. It does not seem as if the spur is the main cause for impingement. Conclusion: Conservative treatment is very effective in the treatment of rotator cuff impingement. However, we believe that the right exercise program is of essence. Stretching the posterior capsule of the shoulder joint and increasing the internal rotation, which are the two most important initial exercises, should be concentrated on. Thereafter the depressor muscles, like sub-scapularis and infra-spinatus must be strengthened


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 103-B, Issue SUPP_3 | Pages 16 - 16
1 Mar 2021
Spencer C Dawes A McGinley B Farley K Daly C Gottschalk M Wagner E
Full Access

Thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) arthritis is a common and disabling condition that can be treated with an operative procedure. Before operative measures, patients typically undergo conservative treatment utilizing methods such as physical therapy and injections. This study aims to determine what clinical modalities are being used for preoperative evaluation and nonoperative therapy and the associated cost prior to operative intervention. We queried Truven Market Scan, a large insurance provider database to identify patients undergoing CMC arthroplasty from 2010 to 2017. Patients were identified by common Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for CMC arthroplasty. All associated CPT codes listed for each patient during the 1 year period prior to operative intervention were collected and filtered to only include those codes associated with the ICD-9/10 diagnosis codes relating to CMC arthritis. The codes were then categorized as office visits, x-ray, injections, physical therapy, medical devices, and preoperative labs. The frequency and associated cost for each category was determined. There were 44,676 patients who underwent CMC arthroplasty during the study period. A total of $26,319,848.36 was charged during the preoperative period, for an average of $589.13 per patient. The highest contributing category to overall cost was office visits (42.1%), followed by injections (13.5%), and then physical therapy (11.1%). The most common diagnostic modality was x-ray, which was performed in 74.7% of patients and made up 11.0% of total charges. Only 49% of patients received at least one injection during the preoperative period and the average number of injections per patient was 1.72. Patients who were employed full time were more likely to receive two or more injections prior to surgery compared to patients who had retired (47% of full-time workers; 34% of retirees). The modalities used for the preoperative evaluation and conservative treatment of CMC arthritis and the associated cost are important to understand in order to determine the most successful and cost-effective treatment plan for patients. Surprisingly, despite the established evidence supporting clinical benefits, many patients do not undergo corticosteroid injections. With office visits being the largest contributor to overall costs, further inquiry into the necessity of multiple visits and efforts to combine visits, can help to reduce cost. Also, with the advent of telemedicine it may be possible to reduce visit cost by utilizing virtual medicine. Determining the best use of telemedicine and its effectiveness are areas for future investigation


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 91-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 134 - 134
1 Mar 2009
Aslam N pan J Schemitsch E Waddell J
Full Access

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the treatment of posttraumatic arthritis following acetabular fracture and to compare the long-term outcome of THA after previous open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or conservative treatment of the acetabular fracture. Method: Thirty-four patients (thirty-six hips) underwent total hip arthroplasty for arthritis resulting from acetabular fractures. There were twenty-six males (27 hips) and eight females (9 hips). The mean age at the time of hip arthroplasty was 49 years (range, 25–78 years). The mean follow-up was eight years and nine months (range, 4–17 years). The mean interval from fracture to arthroplasty was 7.5 years (range, 5 months-29 years). Two patients died of unrelated causes and two patients were lost to follow up. Thirty patients (32 hips) were available for latest follow up. Twenty-one hips had been previously treated by open reduction internal fixation and 11 hips had conservative treatment. Results: Sixteen patients achieved and maintained a good to excellent result over the course of the follow-up. There was no difference in improvement of mean Harris Hip Score between both groups (p> 0.05). Ten out of 32 hips required revision; 9 acetabular components were revised because of aseptic loosening (3), osteolysis/excessive wear (4), instability (1) and infection (1) with a total revision rate of 28%. Eight patients needed acetabular revision alone, one femoral revision alone and one revision of both components. There was no significant difference in bone grafting, heterotopic bone formation, revision rate, operative time and blood loss between the two groups (p> 0.05). Conclusions: Those patients initially treated conservatively had similar long term results compared to those treated primarily by open reduction internal fixation. At long term follow-up the main problem identified was osteolysis and acetabular wear


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 90-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 145 - 146
1 Mar 2008
Pan J Schemitsch E Aslam N Waddell J
Full Access

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of post-traumatic arthritis following acetabular fracture and to compare the long-term outcome of THA after previous open reduction and internal fixation or conservative treatment of the acetabular fracture. Methods: Thirty-four patients (thirty-six hips) underwent total hip arthroplasty for arthritis resulting from an acetabular fracture. The mean age at the time of hip arthroplasty was 49 years. The mean follow-up was eight years and nine months (range, 4–17 years). The mean interval from fracture to arthroplasty was 7.5 years (range, 5 months-29 years). Twenty-three hips had been previously treated by open reduction and internal fixation and 12 hips had a conservatively treated fracture. An uncemented arthroplasty was performed in 31 hips, cemented arthroplasty in 2 patients and a hybrid replacement in 2 patients. Results: Only 16 patients achieved and maintained a good to excellent result over the course of the follow-up. The mean Harris hip score improved from 44.5 points preoperatively to 72.76 points for operatively treated fractures (23 patients). The mean Harris hip score improved from 44.2 points preoperatively to 78.7 points for conservatively treated fractures (12 patients) (p> 0.05). Ten out of 35 hips required revision; 9 were revised because of aseptic loosening and one for infection with a total revision rate of 29%. Femoral bone quality was significant in predicting revision. No femoral radiographic loosening was found at latest follow-up. On the acetabular side, the rate of radiographic loosening was higher. There was no significant difference in bone grafting, heterotopic bone formation, revision rate, operative time and blood loss between the two groups (ORIF vs conservative treatment of acetabular fracture) (p> 0.05). Conclusions: Outcome following total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of post-traumatic arthritis following acetabular fracture is less favourable than following primary osteoarthritis. Those patients initially treated conservatively had similar long term results compared to those treated primarily by open reduction and internal fixation. At long term follow-up, the main problem identified was osteolysis and acetabular wear


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 85-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 35 - 35
1 Jan 2003
Minagawa H Itoi E Saito I Nishi T
Full Access

To clarify the short-term results of conservative treatment for symptomatic full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff. Between September 1996 and August 1999, 107 shoulders of 105 patients were diagnosed as full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff by MRI or arthrography at our institute. All patients were treated conservatively and only 3 shoulders underwent surgery because of persistent pain after 6 months of conservative treatment. Among 104 shoulders treated conservatively for more than 12 months, 102 shoulders of 100 patients were followed up with an average follow-up period of 33 months. Two patients were excluded: one had died and the other had been lost at the time of follow up. Among 102 shoulders, 56 shoulders of 56 patients were assessed by direct examination, and 44 shoulders of 46 patients were interviewed by telephone. There were 54 males and 46 females with an average of 64 years (44–80). The Shoulder Functional Evaluation by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA score) was used for assessment (full score = 75 points). The overall JOA score improved significantly from 41.3 points (initial) to 63.5 points (follow-up) (p< .01). Satisfactory results (> - 60 points) were obtained in 71%. The pain score (full score = 30 points) improved from 8.3 points (initial) to 24.7 points (follow-up) (p< .01). At follow-up, 49% had no pain and 88% did not need any medication. The range of motion, abduction strength, and activities of daily living improved significantly (p< .01). Angle of external rotation at initial examination was positively correlated with the JOA score at follow-up (r=0.373, p> .01). Short-term outcome of conservative treatment for symptomatic full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff was satisfactory in 71% of the patients


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 85-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 221 - 221
1 Mar 2003
Papadopoulos A Panagopoulos A Papas M Tsota E Kalogeropoulou C Zouboulis P Lambiris E
Full Access

Purpose: We present the midterm results of conservative treatment of upper (atlas and axis) cervical spine injuries and we propose a CT-based radiological follow-up study. Material and Methods: In a 12 year period (1990–2001), 45 patients (33 male and 12 female) with a mean age 37.2 years (range 15–75) were presented with an acute injury of the upper cervical spine. There were 19 fractures of the atlas (8 Jefferson’s fractures, 6 isolated lateral mass fractures and 5 posterior arch fractures) and 26 axial fractures (12 odontoid fractures, types I–III according to Anderson’s classification and 14 traumatic spondylolisthesis, types I–II according to Effendi classification). Twenty (20) patients were immobilized using halo-vest and 25 Minerva orthosis. Two (2) patients presented with Brown-Sequard syndrome. All patients were retrospectively reviewed and had clinical and radiological follow-up study (plain films and CT spiral reconstruction films). Mean follow-up was 6.2 years. Mean immobilization time was 3.8 months range. Results: Patients with incomplete neurological lesion did not recover. One patient with an isolated atlas lateral mass fracture, developed a hemiparesis during his hospitalization, which was partially resolved. In the final follow-up study, all patients presented a stable upper cervical spine, on the dynamic flexion/extension plain films. In the final CT spiral reconstruction films, fracture line was evident in 12 patients (27%), while atlantoaxial joint incongruity was obvious in 5 patients. Seven (7) patients (16%) complained for residual neck pain and stiffness and presented reduced range of motion. Conclusion: Conservative treatment of atlantoaxial injuries is effective and offers a stable upper cervical spine. Solid fracture union is not always present. CT spiral reconstruction is very helpful in detecting transverse ligament efficacy and atlantoaxial joint incongruity


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXIV | Pages 15 - 15
1 Jul 2012
Wright J Gardner K Osarumwense D James L
Full Access

Treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture is based on obtaining and maintaining apposition of the ruptured tendon ends. Surgical treatment utilises direct suture repair to produce this objective, while conservative or non-surgical management achieves the same effect of closing the tendon gap by immobilisation of the ankle joint in a plantar flexed position within a plaster cast or POP. There is still variability in the conservative treatment practices and protocols of acute Achilles tendon ruptures. The purpose of this study is to examine the current practice trends in the treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures amongst orthopaedic surgeons in the UK. A postal questionnaire was sent to 221 orthopaedic consultants in 25 NHS hospitals in the Greater London area in June 2010. Type and duration of immobilisation were considered along with the specifics of the regime used. Ninety questionnaires were returned giving a 41% response rate. Conservative treatment methods were used by 72% of respondents. A below knee plaster was the top choice of immobilisation (83%) within this group. The mean period of immobilisation was 9.2 weeks (Range 4-36). Weight bearing was allowed at a mean of 5.3 weeks (range 0-12). The specific regime used by consultants was quite heterogeneous across the group, however the most used immobilisation regimen was a below knee plaster in equinus with 3 weekly serial plaster changes to a neutral position, for a total of nine weeks. A heel raise after plaster removal was favoured by 73% of respondents used for a mean period of 6.4 weeks (Range 2-36). In response to ultrasound use as a diagnostic tool, 42.4% of respondents would never use it, 7.6% would use it routinely, while 50% would use it only according to the clinical situation. Comparison of foot and ankle specialists with non-specialists did not reveal a significant difference in practice in duration of immobilisation or time to bearing weight. Conservative management remains a widely practice option in the treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures. Although there are available a number of modern walking aids, the concept of functional brace immobilisation is not as widely used as below knee plaster cast immobilisation, which remains a popular choice amongst orthopaedic surgeons today. There is still no consensus on the ideal immobilisation regimen although a below knee plaster in equinus with serial changes for a total of nine weeks is the most frequently used choice. Further randomised controlled trials are required to establish the optimal treatment strategy for conservative management of Achilles tendon rupture


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXVII | Pages 479 - 479
1 Sep 2012
Nikolopoulos D Sergides N Safos G Karagiannis A Papagiannopoulos G
Full Access

BACKGROUND. As life expectancy in the population rises, osteoporotic fractures are seen most frequently in the vertebral column. Percutaneous kyphoplasty is increasingly used for pain reduction and stabilization in these patients, but the efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and safety of the procedure remain uncertain. OBJECTIVE. To clarify whether kyphoplasty has additional value compared with optimum pain treatment in patients with acute vertebral fractures. MATERIALS & METHODS. From January 2004 to June 2009, 122 patients (31 males and 91 females), from 56 to 85 years old (mean age 68.5) were treated for 165 osteoporotic vertebral fractures of the thoracic or lumbar spine (minimum 15% height loss; level of fracture at Th5 or lower; bone oedema on MRI), with back pain for 6 weeks or less, and a visual analogue scale (VAS) score of 5 or more. Twelve patients (15 fractures) were lost at follow-up period and excluded. Patients were randomly allocated to percutaneous kyphoplasty (75 patients) or conservative treatment by computer-generated randomization codes. All fractures were analyzed for improvement in sagittal alignment (Cobb angle, kyphotic angle, sagittal index, vertebral height); and pain relief at 1, 6, 12, 24 months, as measured by VAS score. RESULTS. Percutaneous kyphoplasty resulted in direct and greater pain relief than did conservative treatment; difference in mean VAS score between baseline and 1 month was −6,5 after kyphoplasty and −2.4 after conservative treatment, and between baseline and 1 year was −7.2 after kyphoplasty and −3.8 after conservative treatment. No serious complications or adverse events were reported. Apart from the pain, the patient's ability to ambulate independently and without difficulty, and the need for medications improved significantly (P < 0.001) after kyphoplasty. Vertebral height significantly increased at all postoperative intervals, with 10% height increases in 88% of fractures, in kyphoplasty group at 2 years. There were no severe kyphoplasty-related complications, such as neurological defects, cement leakage or narrowing of the spinal canal whereas additional fractures occurred at the adjacent vertebrae at a rate of 10%. 35% of patients treated conservatively, had limitations in everyday activities the first 6 months, whereas additional fractures occurred at the adjacent vertebrae at a rate of 14%. CONCLUSION. In patients with acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures and persistent pain, balloon kyphoplasty is effective and safe. Pain relief after kyphoplasty is immediate, is sustained for at least 2 years, and is significantly greater than that achieved with conservative treatment, at an acceptable cost


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 311 - 311
1 Jul 2011
Trickett R Hodgson P Lyons K Thomas R
Full Access

Background: Acute traumatic rupture of the Tendo-Achilles is a common problem. Review of the published literature shows a conflict between surgical and non-surgical management. Primarily, surgical treatment has repeatedly been shown to have a lower re-rupture rate compared with conservative treatment. However, it is associated with a higher rate of other complications, principally infective soft tissue complications. Debate concerning the method and duration of conservative treatment regimens also remains. Methods: We aimed to assess the effect of knee position on the gap in acute tendo-Achilles ruptures. Our null hypothesis was there is no difference in tendon gap with variation of knee position. Patients with a history and examination consistent with an acute rupture were collected prospectively. They were imaged by the same consultant musculoskeletal consultant radiologist using ultrasound. Tendon gap was measured with the foot in neutral and full tolerable equinus with the knee both flexed to 90° and fully extended. A pilot study of 10 patients was used to provide data for a power calculation and consequently a total of 25 patients were recruited. Results: All patients had their clinical diagnosis confirmed and tendon gap measured in each of the 4 positions. A paired t-test was used to compare mean differences between each position. This confirmed there was no significant difference in the tendon gap with the knee flexed or extended providing the foot is in full equinus. This may have considerable implications on the rationale behind conservative treatment and splinting of acute tendo-Achilles ruptures


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 91-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 280 - 280
1 May 2009
Albert H Manniche C
Full Access

Background: Reviews have showed none or little efficacy of passive conservative treatment modalities for patients with sciatica, reviews on surgery are conflicting. Cohort studies have shown high efficacy of active conservative treatment for patients with sciatica. The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of two active conservative treatment programs to patients with severe sciatica. Methods: The study was a prospective single-blind randomized clinical controlled trial of 181 consecutive patients with radicular pain below the knee. The patients were examined at baseline, 8 weeks later at post treatment follow-up, and at one year follow-up. In both groups treatment consisted of thorough Information concerning anatomy, pathogenesis, how discs heal without surgery, and Advice and encouragement to stay as active as possible, and optional medication. Then either Symptom guided exercises or Sham exercises. Results: All patients experienced a highly significant and clinically important improvement in global assessment, functional status, pain, vocational status, and clinical findings. The Symptom guided exercises + Information + Advice to stay active group (SYMIA) was significantly superior to the Sham exercises + Information + Advice to stay active group (SHAMIA) with regards to global assessment, clinical findings, sick leave and vocational status both at end of treatment and one year follow-up. There was a borderline significant difference in leg pain at end of treatment, and no difference was found in RMQ and EQ-5D. Conclusion: Patients who had symptoms and clinical findings which would qualify them for surgery in most hospitals improved greatly with active conservative treatment. Although the patients had greater faith in the SHAMIA before treatment, the SYMIA treatment was superior in most outcomes


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 84-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages - 84
1 Mar 2002
Coetzee E
Full Access

Evaluating the effectiveness of conservative treatment of odontoid fractures, from 1997 to 1999 we reviewed 22 cases. All were treated first in halo traction and subsequently by halo thoracic brace immobilisation. We used Anderson and D’Alonzo’s classification of types I to III. The mean follow-up time was seven months. Initial displacement was measured radiologically and union was evaluated. In type-II fractures, the incidence of pseudarthrosis was 40%. Fractures with more than 5 mm of initial displacement and more than 10° angulation all went on to nonunion, suggesting that type-II fractures should be treated by internal fixation


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 18 - 18
1 Feb 2012
Aslam N Pan J Schemitsch E Waddell J
Full Access

The purpose of this study was to evaluate total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the treatment of post-traumatic arthritis following acetabular fracture and to compare the long-term outcome of THA after previous open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or conservative treatment of the acetabular fracture. Thirty-four patients (thirty-six hips) underwent total hip arthroplasty for arthritis resulting from acetabular fractures. There were twenty-six males (27 hips) and eight females (9 hips). The mean age at the time of hip arthroplasty was 49 years (range, 25-78 years). The mean follow-up was eight years and nine months (range, 4-17 years). The mean interval from fracture to arthroplasty was 7.5 years (range, 5 months-29 years). Two patients died of unrelated causes and two patients were lost to follow-up. Thirty patients (32 hips) were available for latest follow-up. Twenty-one hips had been previously treated by open reduction internal fixation and 11 hips had conservative treatment. Sixteen patients achieved and maintained a good to excellent result over the course of the follow-up. There was no difference in improvement of mean Harris Hip Score between both groups (p>0.05). Ten out of 32 hips required revision; 9 acetabular components were revised because of aseptic loosening (3), osteolysis/excessive wear (4), instability (1) and infection (1) with a total revision rate of 28%. Eight patients needed acetabular revision alone, one femoral revision alone and one revision of both components. There was no significant difference in bone grafting, heterotopic bone formation, revision rate, operative time and blood loss between the two groups (p> 0.05). Those patients initially treated conservatively had similar long term results compared to those treated primarily by open reduction internal fixation. At long term follow-up the main problem identified was osteolysis and acetabular wear


Distal radius fractures (DRF) are common and the indication for surgical treatment remain controversial in patients higher than 60 years old. The purpose of the study was to review and analyze the current evidence-based literature. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis according to PRISMA guidelines in order to evaluate the efficacy of volar locking plating (VLP) and conservative treatment in DRF in patients over 60 years old. Electronic databases including MEDLINE, CENTRAL, Embase, Web of science and Clinical Trial.gov were searched from inception to October 2020 for randomized controlled trials. Relevant article reference lists were also passed over. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted the data. Main outcomes included functional status: wrist range of motion, validated scores and grip strength. Secondary outcomes include post-operative complications and radiologic assessment. From 3009 screened citations, 5 trials (539 patients) met the inclusion criteria. All trials of this random effect meta-analysis were at moderate risk of bias due to lack of blinding. Differences in the DASH score (MD −5,91; 95% CI, −8,83; −3,00), PRWE score (MD −9.07; 95% CI, −14.57, −3.57) and grip strength (MD 5,12; 95% CI, 0,59-9,65) were statistically significant and favored VLPs. No effect was observed in terms of range of motion. Adverse events are frequent in both treatment groups, reoperation rate is higher in the VLP group. VLP may provide better functional outcomes in patients higher than 60 years old. More RCT are still needed to evaluate if the risks and complications of VLP outweigh the benefits


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 86-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 288 - 288
1 Mar 2004
Psychoyios V Dinopoulos H Villanueva-Lopez F Zambiakis E Sekouris N
Full Access

Introduction: Primary surgical treatment has been recommended for unstable clavicular fractures if consequences of non-union or malunion have to be avoided. A prospective study was undertaken to evaluate the results of a conservative treatment of very unstable fractures of the middle third of the clavicle, with emphasis to very early mobilization. Material: Patients to be included in the study had to met the following criteria: 1) Fractures of the middle third of the clavicle, severely displaced or comminuted, 2) Closed injuries, 3) No neurovascular complications, 4) No pneumothorax or hae-mothorax and 5) No other injury in the ipsilateral upper extremity. Twenty-three patients with an average age of 24 years included in the study. Each patient evaluated with AP and 45-degree cephalad-tilted views. All patients treated with an arm sling and strongly instructed for early mobilization. All patients were evaluated in a weekly interval and assessed with the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeonñs shoulder evaluation form. Results: The average follow up was 21.4 months. All fractures were consolidated and all malunited; but no patient had residual symptoms or functional impairment of the limb. On patient developed mild hypesthesia in the ulnar nerve territory. Conclusion: The extremely encouraging results of our study, within the bounds of the above-mentioned follow up, indicate that conservative treatment with very early mobilization may be considered as a valid therapy. However it is a concern the functional result in a longer follow up as well as the cosmetic result


Distal radius fractures (DRF) are common and the indication for surgical treatment remain controversial in patients higher than 60 years old. The purpose of the study was to review and analyze the current evidence-based literature. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis according to PRISMA guidelines in order to evaluate the efficacy of volar locking plating (VLP) and conservative treatment in DRF in patients over 60 years old. Electronic databases including MEDLINE, CENTRAL, Embase, Web of science and Clinical Trial.gov were searched from inception to October 2020 for randomized controlled trials. Relevant article reference lists were also passed over. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted the data. Main outcomes included functional status: wrist range of motion, validated scores and grip strength. Secondary outcomes include post-operative complications and radiologic assessment. From 3009 screened citations, 5 trials (539 patients) met the inclusion criteria. All trials of this random effect meta-analysis were at moderate risk of bias due to lack of blinding. Differences in the DASH score (MD −5,91; 95% CI, −8,83; −3,00), PRWE score (MD −9.07; 95% CI, −14.57, −3.57) and grip strength (MD 5,12; 95% CI, 0,59-9,65) were statistically significant and favored VLPs. No effect was observed in terms of range of motion. Adverse events are frequent in both treatment groups, reoperation rate is higher in the VLP group. VLP may provide better functional outcomes in patients higher than 60 years old. More RCT are still needed to evaluate if the risks and complications of VLP outweigh the benefits


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 164 - 164
1 May 2011
Buijze G Doornberg J Ham J Ring D Bhandari M Poolman R
Full Access

Background: Traditionally, non-displaced scaphoid fractures are considered by most as stable with predictable rates of healing with conservative treatment. There is a current trend in orthopedic practice, however, to treat non- or minimal displaced fractures with early open reduction and internal fixation. This trend is not evidence based. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we pool data from trials comparing surgical and conservative treatment for acute scaphoid fractures, thus aiming to summarize the best available evidence. Methods: We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and reference list of articles, and contacted researchers in the field. We selected eight randomized controlled trials comparing surgical versus conservative interventions for acute scaphoid fractures in adults. Data were pooled using fixed-effects and randomeffects models with standard mean differences (SMD) and risk ratios for continuous and dichotomous variables respectively. Heterogeneity across studies was assessed with Forest plots and calculation of the I2 statistic. Results: Four-hundred seventeen patients were included in eight trials (205 fractures were treated surgically and 212 conservatively). Most trials lacked scientific rigor. Four studies assessed functional outcome with validated physician- and patient-based outcome instruments. With the numbers available (200 patients), we found a significant difference according to our primary outcome measure, standardized patient-based outcome in favor of surgical treatment (p< 0.0001). With regard to our secondary parameters, we found heterogeneous results that favored surgical treatment for grip strength, time to union and time off work. In contrast we found no significant differences between surgical and conservative treatment for pain, range of motion, rate of nonunion, malunion, and infection, rate of complications, and total treatment costs. Conclusions: Patient-rated functional outcome and satisfaction as well as time to return to function favored surgical treatment for acute scaphoid fractures. However, there is no evidence from prospective randomized controlled trials on physician-rated functional outcome, radiographic outcome, complication rates and treatment costs to favor surgical or conservative treatment for acute scaphoid fractures


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 86-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 210 - 210
1 Mar 2004
Erggelet C
Full Access

Defects of the joint cartilage are of enormous medical and socio-economic impact. Meanwhile is widely acknowledged that untreated cartilage defects lead to an early onset of osteoarthritis. Intrinsic factors for the genesis of osteoarthritis are unknown. It is wellknown however that joint cartilage has only a limited capacity of regeneration. The conservative treatment of early osteoarthritis should focus on the following principles: Limit the pain. Various drugs are available for the symptomatic treatment of osteoarthritis (e.g. NSAIR, cortison, herbal preparations). Intrarticular injections with antiinflammatory agents (e.g. hyaluronan, cortison, IL-1 antagonists) have been proven to reduce pain and dysfunction. Orthetic devices are able to unload joint compartments destroyed by osteoarthritic cartilage lesions. Arthroscopic lavage and debridement eliminate inflammation mediating substances and balance the synovial environment. Maintain the function. Physiotherapy and massage fight the stiffness of the joint and enhance the periarticular circulation. Daily activity should be encouraged and supported e.g. by walking aids and custom-made shoewear. Reduce factors for progression. A successful dietary program can minimize overload of osteoarthritic joints. Surgical procedures to restore and maintain meniscal function, joint stability and physiological loading are beneficial to prevent further cartilage deterioration. Regeneration of cartilaginous surfaces e.g. by marrow stimulation techniques or autologous chondrocyte transplantation will ease joint function and inhibit enzymatic degradation of healthy cartilage. In the last 10 years modern biochemical and cell biological techniques opened new horizons for the treatment of cartilage defects and osteoarthritis Future will teach us the value of cartilage regeneration to treat osteoarthritis. The biologic approach of cell based therapies and the arthroscopic application of resorbable implants widen the indications for the conservative surgical treatment of osteoarthritis


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 84-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 314 - 314
1 Nov 2002
Eylon S Bloom R Peyser A Barzilay Y Liebergall M
Full Access

Background: The Achilles tendon is the strongest and thickest tendon in the human body, it is very commonly injured with significant clinical implications. The treatment of Achilles tendon rupture is a matter of controversy in orthopedics and sports medicine. Surgical repair compared with conservative treatment is debated constantly in the literature, without a conclusive decision. The diagnosis of Achilles tendon rupture is based usually on clinical examination, and may be reinforced by ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging. The present study has been conducted in order to determine whether an ultrasound examination performed at the time of injury could be useful in deciding how to treat the patient. Patients: Over a period of 5 years we treated 26 patients who had a clinical presentation of ruptured Achilles tendon with ultrasound diagnosis of either a partial tear or a full tear. Patients who were diagnosed by ultrasound as having a full tendon tear were operated on, and were not included in this study. Eight patients had partial tear of the tendon, six had a tear of the musculotendinous region, and twelve had a proximal tear. All patients were treated by means of a cast or a dressing, with limitation of weight bearing. The follow-up period ranged between six months to three years after the injury, and included up-to-date functional evaluation. Results: Eighteen patients were available for evaluation. Excellent functional results were reported by five patients, twelve patients reported good results, and one patient complained of a bad result. None of our patients needed delayed surgery, and only one suffered from re-rupture of the tendon during his rehabilitation, and was treated conservatively with good results. No correlation was found between the location of the tear and the functional results. Conclusions: 1. Ultrasound is an important and accurate tool in the diagnosis of Achilles tendon tear and is helpful in choosing the appropriate treatment. 2. Partial tear of Achilles tendon is not an indication for operative treatment, even when the clinical examination (Thompson test) is positive. The outcome of conservative treatment in this situation is as good or even better than surgical treatment


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXVII | Pages 482 - 482
1 Sep 2012
Popa I Negoescu D Poenaru D Faur C Florescu S
Full Access

BACKGROUND CONTEXT. Osteoporosis causes decreased bone mineral density, which predisposes to fragility fractures. Low-energy vertebral compression fractures are the most common type of osteoporotic fragility fracture. Prior studies have shown that only one-quarter of patients diagnosed with an osteoporotic fracture are referred or treated for osteoporosis. PURPOSE. To identify the rate of recurrent fractures after vertebroplasty and after the conservative treatment for patients aged 50 years and older who sustained low impact vertebral compressions fractures over a 6-month period. STUDY DESIGNED/SETTING. Prospective study. PATIENT SAMPLE. The sample included patients 50 years or older who had a low-energy vertebral compression fracture. The patients were divided into two groups: first group (n=24) - patients teated by vertebroplasty and the second group (n=34) - patients treated conservatory. There was no significant difference among the groups in terms of the vertebral levels or BMD. METHODS. Patients records were reviewed for fracture recurrence and in the same time we examined medical records for osteoporotic medication prescriptions, refferals to endocrinology and to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans. RESULTS. Confounding factors of age at the procedure, sex and chronic steroids use were considered and found to have no statistically significant difference between the two groups and between those with fracture recurrence and those without fracture recurrence. Four vertebroplasty procedure resulted in a recurrent fracture within the first 6 months. In the patient group treated conservatory 8 patients sustained recurrent fractures. Patients with recurrent vertebral fracture didn't receive active osteoporosis treatment. Within 6 months after the fracture only 21% of patients were receiving active osteoporosis treatment. CONCLUSIONS. The incidence of recurrent fracture after vertebroplasty or after conservative treatment is substantial but have no statistically significant difference between the two groups. We consider that the recurrence rate is not related with the surgical intervention but is the result of natural history of the patient's osteoporosis because the patients do not understand the importance of initiating active therapeutic intervention for osteoporosis recommended by physicians