Background. The surgical management of musculoskeletal tumours is a challenging problem, particularly in pelvic and diaphyseal tumour resection where accurate determination of bony transection points is extremely important to optimise oncologic, functional and reconstructive options. The use of computer assisted navigation in these cases could improve surgical precision. Materials and methods. We resected musculoskeletal tumours in fifteen patients using commercially available computer navigation software (Orthomap 3D). Results. Of the eight pelvic tumours, three underwent biological reconstruction with extra corporeal irradiation, three endoprosthetic replacement (EPR) and two required no bony reconstruction. Four diaphyseal tumours had biological reconstruction. Two patients with proximal femoral sarcoma underwent extra-articular resection and EPR. One soft tissue sarcoma of the adductor compartment involving the femur was resected with EPR. Histological examination of the resected specimens revealed tumour free margins in all cases. Post-operative radiographs and CT show resection and reconstruction as planned in all cases. Several learning points were identified related to juvenile bony anatomy and intra-operative registration. Discussion. The use of computer navigation in musculoskeletal oncology allows integration of local anatomy and tumour extent to identify resection margins accurately. Furthermore, it can aid in reconstruction following tumour resection. Our experience thus far has been encouraging

Surgical training has been greatly affected by the challenges of reduced training opportunities, shortened working hours, and financial pressures. There is an increased need for the use of training system in developing psychomotor skills of the surgical trainee for fracture fixation. The training system was developed to simulate dynamic hip screw fixation. 12 orthopaedic senior house officers performed dynamic hip screw fixation before and after the training on training system. The results were assessed based on the scoring system that included the amount of time taken, accuracy of guide wire placement and the number of exposures requested to complete the procedure. The result shows a significant improvement in amount of time taken, accuracy of fixation and the number of exposures after the training on simulator system. This was statistically significant using paired student t-test (p-value <0.05).

Computer navigated training system appears to be a good training tool for young orthopaedic trainees The system has the potential to be used in various other orthopaedic procedures for learning of technical skills aimed at ensuring a smooth escalation in task complexity leading to the better performance of procedures in the operating theatre.

Abstract. Introduction. Component mal-positioning in total hip replacement (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR) can increase the risk of revision for various reasons. Compared to conventional surgery, relatively improved accuracy of implant positioning can be achieved using computer assisted technologies including navigation, patient-specific jigs, and robotic systems. However, it is not known whether application of these technologies has improved prosthesis survival in the real-world. This study aimed to compare risk of revision for all-causes following primary THR and TKR, and revision for dislocation following primary THR performed using computer assisted technologies compared to conventional technique. Methods. We performed an observational study using National Joint Registry data. All adult patients undergoing primary THR and TKR for osteoarthritis between 01/04/2003 to 31/12/2020 were eligible. Patients who received metal-on-metal bearing THR were excluded. We generated propensity score weights, using Sturmer weight trimming, based on: age, gender, ASA grade, side, operation funding, year of surgery, approach, and fixation. Specific additional variables included position and bearing for THR and patellar resurfacing for TKR. For THR, effective sample sizes and duration of follow up for conventional versus computer-guided and robotic-assisted analyses were 9,379 and 10,600 procedures, and approximately 18 and 4 years, respectively. For TKR, effective sample sizes and durations of follow up for conventional versus computer-guided, patient-specific jigs, and robotic-assisted groups were 92,579 procedures over 18 years, 11,665 procedures over 8 years, and 644 procedures over 3 years, respectively. Outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed using hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results. For THR, analysis comparing computer-guided versus conventional technique demonstrated HR of 0.771 (95%CI 0.573–1.036) p=0.085, and 0.594 (95%CI 0.297–1.190) p=0.142, for revision for all-causes and dislocation, respectively. When comparing robotic-assisted versus conventional technique, HR for revision for all-causes was 0.480 (95%CI 0.067 –3.452) p=0.466. For TKR, compared to conventional surgery, HR for all-cause revision for procedures performed using computer guidance and patient-specific jigs were 0.967 (95% CI 0.888–1.052) p=0.430, and 0.937 (95% CI 0.708–1.241) p=0.65, respectively. HR for analysis comparing robotic-assisted versus conventional technique was 2.0940 (0.2423, 18.0995) p = 0.50. Conclusions. This is the largest study investigating this topic utilising propensity score analysis methods. We did not find a statistically significant difference in revision for all-causes and dislocation although these analyses are underpowered to detect smaller differences in effect size between groups. Additional comparison for revision for dislocation between robotic-assisted versus conventionally performed THR was not performed as this is a subset of revision for all-causes and wide confidence intervals were already observed for that analysis. It is also important to mention this NJR analysis study is of an observational study design which has inherent limitations. Nonetheless, this is the most feasible study design to answer this research question requiring use of a large data set due to revision being a rare outcome. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Study design. Literature review of the best available evidence on the accuracy of computer assisted pedicle screw insertion. Background. Pedicle screw misplacement rates with the conventional insertion technique and adequate postoperative CT examination have ranged from 5 to 29 % in the cervical spine, from 3 to 58 % in the thoracic spine, and from 6 to 41% in the lumbosacral region. Despite these relatively high perforation rates, the incidence of reported screw-related complications has remained low. Interestingly, the highest rates of neurovascular injuries have been reported from the lumbosacral spine in up to 17% of the patients. Gertzbein and Robbins introduced a 4-mm “safe zone” in the thoracolumbar spine for medial encroachment, consisting of 2-mm of epidural and 2-mm of subarachnoid space. Later, several authors have found the safety margins to be significantly smaller, suggesting that the “safe zone” thresholds of Gertzbein and Robbins do not apply to the thoracic spine, and seem to be too high even for the lumbar spine. The midthoracic and midcervical spine, as well as the thoracolumbar junction set the highest demands for accuracy in pedicle screw insertion, with no room for either translational or rotational error at e.g. T5 level. Computer assisted pedicle screw insertion (navigation) was introduced in the early 90's to increase the accuracy and safety of pedicle screw insertion. Material. PubMed literature search revealed two randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing the in vivo accuracy of conventional and computer assisted pedicle screw insertion techniques. Three meta-analyses have assessed the published reports on the accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with or without computer assistance, one additional meta-analysis concentrated on the functional outcome of computer assisted pedicle screw insertion. Results. The RCTs by Laine et al and Rajasekaran et al achieved significantly higher screw placement accuracy with computer assistance than with the conventional techniquebased on anatomical landmarks. In a degenerative patient population, Laine et al reported a misplacement rate of 4.6% with computer assistance compared to 13.4% with the conventional technique. In addition to this quantitative difference, a qualitative difference in the misplaced screws was noticed: in the conventional group, 28 out of 37 misplaced screws were either inferior or medial, whereas in the computer assisted group, 1 out of 10 misplaced screws was situated in these ”danger zones”. In deformity surgery, Rajasekaran et al reported a 2% pedicle screw misplacement rate with a computer assisted technique compared to 23% with the conventional technique. Interestingly, in their study, the average screw insertion time in the computer assisted group was significantly shorter than with the conventional technique. The three meta-analyses, assessing up to 37 337 pedicle screws, reported significantly higher accuracy in the placement of pedicle screws with computerassistance compared with the conventional methods. The superiority of the computer assisted technique was even more obvious with abnormal surgical anatomy. CT-based and 3D-fluoroscopy-based navigation methods provided better accuracy compared to 2Dfluoroscopy-based navigation. No statistically significant benefit with computer assistance in the incidence of neuro-vascular complications, or in functional outcome was demonstrated. Conclusion. High pedicle screw misplacement rates have been reported with the conventional technique based on anatomical landmarks and intraoperative fluoroscopy. The concept of ”safe zone” is hypothetical, and underestimates the true risks of misplaced pedicle screws. Computer assistance significantly improves the accuracy and safety of pedicle screw insertion. It will, however, be difficult to correlate this increased accuracy to improved patient outcomes

Background: The use of sacro-iliac screws to restore the stability of posterior pelvic ring dissociations has become a standard technique. Several methods are described including fluoroscopy, CT and computer assisted techniques. Fluoroscopically assisted insertion is the standard technique. Multiple exposures of ionising radiation permit acquisition of a target in sequential planes, requiring a process of interpolation for 3-D localisation. A computer assisted technique facilitates the simultaneous visualisation of multiple planes following a single image intensifier acquisition and registration process in each plane. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the accuracy of a computer assisted surgery technique and quantify the predicted reduction in radiation exposure. Methods: 10 embalmed human cadavers were used. In each specimen, a sacro-iliac screw was simulated by passing a 5mm reamer over a 3.2mm guide wire. The index track was formed with a closely sheathed 4.8mm drill and was inserted with the standard fluoroscopically assisted technique in the left hemipelvis and a computer assisted technique(Vector Vision trauma) on the right. Registration of the system is achieved by the placement of infra red reflective arrays on all tracked objects. These include the right and left hemi-pelvis, the fluoroscope, the drill guide and the driver unit. The system is an open platform which registers arrays of known geometry whilst permitting the registration of instruments by means of an instrument calibration matrix. The pelvic T and Y pattern fiducials are fixed rigidly to inter-table threaded pins at the level of the gluteal tuberosities. The standard acquisition projections are inlet and outlet views for both techniques with the addition of lateral projections although the latter were not directly used for navigation. Postoperative CT scans demonstrate the actual tracks and analysis is facilitated by means of a digital mapping technique. Results: The accuracy of the fluoroscopically assisted and computer assisted techniques is identical. The procedure time was significantly longer for the computer assisted technique although most of the additional time was accounted for by the “line of sight” registration process. There was a reduction in both the total screening time and the measured radiation dose in the case of the computer assisted technique although this did not reach statistical significance as the sample size is relatively small. Conclusions: The navigation of sacro-iliac screw tracks by means of both fluoroscopically assisted and computer assisted techniques proves equally accurate in a human cadaveric model

Introduction: Obesity [Body Mass Index (BMI) > 30] is seen in a growing percentage of patients seeking joint replacement surgery. Recent studies have shown no clear influence of obesity on the five-year, clinical outcome of total knee replacement; except for the morbidly obese (BMI > 40). Computer navigation has shown improved consistency of prosthetic component alignment. However, this aid does significantly increase operation time. Aims:. To compare tourniquet times of standard and computer assisted total knee arthroplasty in patients with BMI more than 30. To evaluate the change in this variable as a surgeon gained experience over a three year period. Methods and Results: A retrospective analysis of 82, obese, total knee replacements performed by a single surgeon, at a dedicated arthroplasty centre, was undertaken. Conventional knee replacement instrumentation (Plus Orthopaedics, UK) was used in 42 cases and computer assisted navigation (Galileo- Plus Orthopaedics) in 39 cases. The patients were divided into three equal sized groups (1, 2 & 3), in chronological order. Each group comprised fourteen knees undertaken using standard surgical technique and thirteen knees using computer assisted navigation. Group1 had average tourniquet times of 95.69 and 111.67 minutes in the standard and computer assisted groups respectively (p 0.01). Group 2 tourniquet times were 80.75 and 92.33 minutes (p 0.05). Group 3 tourniquet times were 84.5 and 87.5 minutes; these were not significantly different. Conclusions: As the surgeon acquired experience of computer assisted navigation, his tourniquet times decreased and by the end of our study period, there was no longer any difference between the tourniquet times for conventional and computer assisted knee replacement in this subgroup of obese patients. We hypothesise that in obese patients, computer assisted navigation helps the surgeon to overcome jig alignment uncertainty and thus improves accuracy of component alignment without any significant time penalty

Computer assisted surgical techniques in total knee arthroplasty have demonstrated increased accuracy of alignment and decreased risk of outliers. Some studies have also demonstrated improved early functional results and pain scores in comparison to traditional surgical methods. Studies have also shown a slightly increased surgical time for computer assisted surgery. A learning curve for computer assisted surgery is recognized, and there may be different outcomes for cases performed initially during the learning phase. This study reports on a single surgeon’s experience with the initial 261 computer assisted total knee arthroplasties. A single experienced, fellowship trained surgeon performed computer assisted total knee arthroplasty utilizing either the BrainLab or Ci intraoperative navigation system and either the LCS Complete Mobile Bearing Knee System (DePuy) or Sigma PFC Rotating Platform (DePuy). Preoperative and postoperative data was recorded prospectively (DePuy Captureware) of the initial 261 consecutive cases at minimum of one year follow-up. SAS 9.1 was used to perform univariate and multivariate analyses of four groups of patients: patients 1–77, patients 78–135, patients 136–211 and patients 212–261. Multivariate analyses were performed to control for body mass index, age, sex, implant type, pre-operative range of motion, preoperative function and preoperative pain scores. Multivariate analysis of these four groups demonstrated that there was no statistically significant difference in the improvement of postoperative function (p=0.29) and pain scores (p=0.28) among the patients in the four groups at minimum one year follow-up. There was a statistically significant difference in improvement of postoperative extension (p=0.0022) and flexion (p=0.0139) scores with subsequent surgeries, however the range of improvement for the groups was not clinically significant (extension ranging from 1.97 to 5.92 degrees gained in the four groups, and flexion loss of 0.67 degrees to gain of 6.18 degrees in the four groups). The number of patients requiring a hospitalization greater than two days decreased with each subsequent group which was clinically significant (p=0.021, p=0.001, p< 0.0001 for the second, third and fourth groups, respectively). For an experienced reconstructive surgeon incorporating computer assisted surgery into his total knee arthroplasty practice, there is no significant learning curve in regards to intermediate term outcomes. Patients undergoing computer assisted total knee arthroplasty have similar intermediate outcomes whether performed earlier in that surgeon’s experience or later. Patients did initially have shorter hospitalization stays in subsequent groups. However, at an intermediate follow-up period of one year, there is no significant difference in patients’ postoperative improvement in function, pain score, knee flexion and knee extension

We present minimum 20 year results of a randomized, prospective double blinded trial (RCT) of cross-linked versus conventional polyethylene (PE), using a computer assisted method of PE wear measurement. After Ethics Committee approval, 122 patients were enrolled into an RCT comparing Enduron (non cross-linked PE) and highly cross-linked Marathon PE (DePuy, Leeds, UK). Other than the PE liners, identical components were used, a Duraloc 300 metal shell with one screw, a 28mm CoCr femoral head and a cemented Charnley Elite femoral stem. All patients were followed with anteroposterior (A∼P) and lateral radiographs at 3 days, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10 and 20 years. PE wear was measured with PolyMig, which has a phantom validated accuracy of ± 0.09mm. At minimum 20 year follow-up, 47 patients had died, 5 of which had been revised prior to their death. Another 32 patients were revised and alive, leaving 43 patients unrevised and alive (15 Enduron, 28 Marathon). No patients were lost to follow-up, but 2 were not able to be radiographed (dementia), leaving 41 patients (15 Enduron, 26 Marathon) available for PE wear measurement. After the bedding-in period, Enduron liners had a wear rate of 0.182 mm/year, and Marathon liners had a wear rate of 0.028 mm/year. At 20 years follow-up, 37 patients had required revision. Patients with conventional PE had three times the revision rate (28/37) of those who received XLPE (9/37). This is the longest term RCT showing substantially improved clinical and radiological results when XLPE is used as the bearing surface

Since 2000 we have performed TKR with the aid of a computer assisted navigation system (PiGalileo). Over this time we have made more than 2000 TKR, while continuing to monitor results from both standard technique and computer navigated TKR. As we began to work with the computer assisted navigation system, we ran a comparison trial to ascertain the accuracy of mechanical axis calculation. The trial comprised of 32 patients. The accuracy of the calculation in both techniques was measured by paralax-free X-ray. The computer assisted navigation group showed a deviation of 0.9°–2.5°, whereas the standard technique group showed a deviation of 3.5°–4.6°. A second comparison was conducted involving 186 patients. The TKR were performed from August 2000 to December 2001. All patients received the same implant (TC-Solution). All operations were performed by the hospital’s two most senior surgeons. Cases involving deviations from our standard TKR (such as patellar replacement) were eliminated from the trial. Two groups were created randomly:. Group A (88 patients) standard technique. Group B (98 patients) technique with the aid of computer assisted navigation system. All patients were examined by an independent doctor, in accordance with a clearly defined protocol. Preoperative and postoperative clinical examinations with X-rays were made. Check ups with valuation of the KSS score (Insall) and HSS Knee score (Ranavate and Shine) followed after 3,6,12,24 and 60 months. Both groups have comparable biometric data. In the post-surgery checks we found noticeable differences in the axis positions of the legs and the ventral cutting plane in favour of group B. This group showed better clinical results and patient satisfaction. There was no difference in the outcome in case of retropatelar problems, as the first generation software did not permit rotation assessment of the prosthesis. The current version of the system allows this assessment. The results of our clincal observations confirm the advantage of computer navigated TKR. It has become our standard operating method. The navigation system is reliable, warrants better axis and rotation positioning of the prosthesis; exact cutting planes, and consequently, exact setting of the implants. Through progressive development of the navigation system and refined surgical techniques in relation to computer assisted TKR, we have reduced the average TKR operating time

Background. Limb length discrepancy after total hip replacement is one of the possible complications of suboptimal positioning of the implant and cause of patients dissatisfaction. Computer assisted navigation become affirmed in last years for total hip replacement surgery and it is also used for the evaluation of the intra-operative limb length discrepancy. The purpose of this study is to verify the reliability of a navigation system with a dedicated software in intraoperative evaluation of limb lengthening and offset as compared with manual technique. Methods. Forty patients who underwent a Total Hip Arthroplasty in our institution were entrolled in this study. Twenty patients were evaluated with pre operative manual planning (group A) and treated with hand positioning of femoral stem. Twenty Patient were evaluated with preoperative manual planning and treated with Computer assisted navigation of Stem (group B). Mean operating time and blood loss were analyzed. Radiological and clinical follow up was made at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperative to assess any mismatch of implant, complications and clinical results that was measured with Harris Hip Score. Results. In the evaluation of the limb length and offset in group A there wasn't significance difference between pre and postoperative measurements obtained with manual planning. Also in group B there wasn't a significance difference between the measurement obtained intraoperative with computer assisted navigation and the one obtainedafter surgery and preoperative with manual planning. In any case we noted a limb length discrepancy in this series. No statistically significance difference was noted between the two groups in relations to the others parameters investigated. Conclusions. Based on our study the computer navigation system is a simple and reliable for the evaluation of limb length discrepancy and offset in total hip replacement. This Navigation system can offer to the surgeon a valid intraoperative information that can reduce possible errors in stem positioning and can reduce rate of length discrepancy

Background. Stress fractures at tracker after computer navigated total knee replacement are rare. Periprosthetic fracture after Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis (MIPO) of stress fracture through femoral tracker is unique in orthopaedic literature. We are reporting this unique presentation of periprosthetic fractures after MIPO for stress fracture involving femoral pin site track in computer assisted total knee arthroplasty, treated by reconstruction nail (PFNA). Methods. A 75-year old female, who had computer navigated right total knee replacement, was admitted 6 weeks later with increasing pain over distal thigh for 3 weeks without trauma. Prior to onset of pain, she achieved a range of movements of 0–105 degrees. Perioperative radiographs did not suggest obvious osteoporosis, pre-existent benign or malignant lesion, or fracture. Radiographs demonstrated transverse fracture of distal third of femur through pin site track. We fixed the fracture with 11-hole combihole locking plate by MIPO technique. Eight weeks later, she was readmitted with periprosthetic fracture through screw hole at the tip of MIPO Plate and treated by Reconstruction Nail (PFNA), removal of locking screws and refixation of intermediate segment with unicortical locking screws. Then she was protected with plaster cylinder for 4 weeks and hinged brace for 2 months. Results. Retrograde nail for navigation pin site stress fracture entails intraarticular approach with attendant risks including scatches to prosthesis and joint infection. So we opted to fix by MIPO technique. Periprosthetic fracture at the top of MIPO merits fixation with antegrade nail in conjunction with conversion of screws in the proximal part of the plate to unicortical locking screws. Overlap of at least 3cms offers biomechanical superiority. She made an uneventful recovery and was started on osteoporosis treatment, pending DEXA scan. Conclusion. Reconstruction Nail (PFNA), refixation of intermediate segment with unicortical locking screws constitutes a logical management option for the unique periprosthetic fracture after MIPO of stress fracture involving femoral pin site track in computer assisted total knee replacement

Introduction. Post traumatic arthritis of the knee can be a conseguence of distal femur fracture and retained hardware can complicate any further surgical option including arthroplasty. Both staged surgical procedures to remove before the hardware or simultaneous procedure of arthroplasty and removal of hardware have been indicated with an increased risk of complications. Aim of this study is to present a consecutive series of TKA following distal femur fracture using a computer assisted technique without the removal of retained hardware assessing both the efficacy of navigation in managing these complex cases as “routinary” primary arthroplasties. Material and Methods. A consecutive series of 16 patients treated with a computer assisted TKR following femoral fracture and with retained hardware were included in the study (group A). The interval between the fracture and operation averaged 5.8 years (range 1–12 years), the retained hardwares was an intramedullary nail in 6 cases, distal lateral plates in 7 cases and screws in 4 cases. All patients in group A were matched with a patient who had undergone to a computer assisted TKR using the same implant and software because of atraumatic knee arthritis in the same period (group B). Patients were matched in terms of age, gender, pre-operative range of motion, pre-operative arthritis severity according to Albaack classification, type and grade of deformity and implant features (cruciate retaining or sacrificing). There were 10 male and 6 female for each group, the mean pre-operative age was 64.3 years (range: 54–72) for the group A and 65.4 years (range: 53–74) for the group B. The mean pre-operative flexion was 85.5 degrees (range: 65–115) and 88.1 degrees (range: 70–115) for the post traumatic group and the matched group respectively. Results. There were no statistical significant differences in surgical time, hospital staying, intra/post operative complications. Likewise at a mean follow-up of 47 months no statistically significant difference was seen for the Knee Society, Functional, GIUM and WOMAC scores between the 2 groups. Implant alignment was similar between the 2 groups with similar radiological parameters. Conclusions. The results of this study demonstrated that knee arthritis following distal femoral fracture can be safely managed using computer assisted TKA without any need of hardware removal and obvious costs savings. The Authors achieved both same results and same complication rate of similar uncomplicated primary TKR

To prospectively evaluate the accuracy as well as patient outcome of computer-assisted total knee replacement in a multi-centric randomised study. Two hundred and ninety-five patients in six European centers were randomised between two groups: One hundred and forty-seven in the conventional surgery group and one hundred and forty-eight in the computer assisted surgery. Radiological as well as clinical data (SF-36 and KSS scores) were collected preoperatively as well as six weeks and six months postoperatively. A multilevel mixed-effects linear regression for nested variable with random-effects was used to estimate the effect of the independent variable (type of surgery: conventional surgery vs computer assisted surgery) on each of the dependent variables at six weeks and six months post-operatively. Mechanical axis was statistically better in the navigation group at six weeks (p=0,01) and six months (p=0,04). Similar results are found for the femoral component at six months (p=0,001). At six months, there were statistically greater improvements in the following SF-36 scales for the computer assisted group: bodily pain (p=0,03), role emotional (p=0,03), mental health (p< 0,001), physical health dimension (p=0,01), mental health dimension (p=0,005) and global SF36 score (p=0,002). While a difference in operating time was noted (p< 10-5), the blood losses where similar for both groups (p=0.8). Computer assisted surgery improves the accuracy in total knee arthroplasty, especially for the mechanical axis and the femoral component orientation. These improvements result in better quality of life for the patient at six months postoperatively. Level of Evidence: I – High-quality randomised controlled trial with statistically significant difference

Objective:. Periacetabular spherical osteotomy for the treatment of dysplastic hip is effective but technically demanding. To help surgeons perform this difficult procedure reliably and safely, a computer assisted navigation technique has been developed and evaluated. Methods:. Computed tomographic scans of 5 cadaveric pelvises were obtained and three-dimensional models were generated. The osteotomy was planned preoperatively. The pelvises were registered using an optimized algorithm. Periacetabular spherical osteotomy was performed at one side of each pelvis with navigation and at another side without navigation. The deviation of the real osteotomized surface from the planned surface was measured. Results:. The computer assisted navigation system supported preoperative planning and provided real time display of the surgical procedure. The deviation of the real osteotomized surface from the planned surface was 1.59 ± 0.18 mm in the group with navigation, while 4.81 ± 1.67 mm in the group without navigation. The difference of the deviations has statistical significance (p < 0.003). Conclusion:. A computer assisted navigation technique is able to help increase accuracy and safety of periacetabular spherical osteotomy, and thus facilitate performing this difficult procedure

Introduction: There has been significant development in computer technology in recent years and this has led to applications in orthopaedic surgery. Of particular interest is computer assisted joint arthroplasty to enable accurate insertion of the components based on CT generated images of the patient’s bones. Methods: Twenty-five patients have undergone computer assisted total knee arthroplasty using a computer guidance system (Vector Vision, Brain Lab, Munich) implanting a PFC cruciate retaining total knee replacement (TKR) (Depuy, Leeds). Pre-operative CT scans were obtained from each patient and alignment and sizing were calculated before surgery. Intra-operatively, an infrared camera tracked the instruments and the patient’s limb was accurately mapped in space by surface matching the bone and comparing it with the CT scan. For the purpose of the study the computer generated alignments and sizing were evaluated along with the use of traditional instruments and stored in a database. Results: These have been evaluated comparing computer assisted and instrumented knee arthroplasty. Variables measured include the AP femoral cuts, rotational femoral alignment, and tibial axis alignment in AP and lateral planes. Conclusions: Computer assisted orthopaedic surgery has undergone a rapid development in the last 18 months to enable real-time intra-operative images to be viewed in a moving limb with a degree of accuracy previously not possible. The use of this technology may lead to more accurate alignment of hip and knee prostheses and therefor help to reduce wear in the long-term

To determine the precision of conventional versus computer assisted techniques for positioning the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Malposition of the acetabular component during THA increases the occurrence of impingement, reduces range of motion, and increases the risk of dislocation and long-term wear. To prevent malpositioned hip implants, an increasing number of computer assisted surgery systems have been described, but their accuracy is not well established. Using a lateral approach, 150 cups were placed by 10 different surgeons in 10 identical plastic pelvis models. Only the immediate operating field was visible. Pre-operative planning was performed with a computerised tomography scan. Fifty cups were placed free hand, 50 others with the standard cup positioner, and the remaining 50 cups using computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery (Medivision). The accuracy of cup abduction and anteversion was assessed with an electromagnetic system (Fastrak™). Using conventional techniques, free hand placement revealed a mean precision of cup anteversion and abduction of 10° (range 5.5 to 14) and 3.5° (2.5 to 5) respectively. With the cup positioner, these angles measured 8° (5 to 10.5) and 4° (3 to 5.5) respectively, and using the computer assisted method, the mean cup anteversion precision was 1.5° (1 to 2) and mean cup abduction measured 2.5° (2 to 3.5). Computer assisted cup placement is a very accurate and reproducible technique during THA. It is clearly more precise than either of the two traditional methods of cup positioning, even for well-trained surgeons

Two computer assisted techniques (CT and a fluoro-guide based system) were used to insert the femoral component of the Oxford Unicompartmental Knee arthroplasty. The accuracy and variability of component positioning were compared. Clinical data was collected pre-operatively and is being collected post-operatively. Standing AP and lateral knee X-rays as well as skyline X-rays were collected pre-operatively and post-operative full length AP and lateral femur X-rays were completed in order to measure alignment of the femoral component. Results are showing accurate insertions of the Oxford knee femoral component using both systems. To review two computer-assisted techniques for inserting Oxford Unicompartmental Knee arthroplasties. CT based and fluro based techniques were compared with regards to accuracy and variability of component positioning. Currently we are able to use either a CT based system or a fluro based system to accurately insert the femoral component of the Oxford Unicompartmental Knee arthroplasty. Computer assist techniques are allowing us to perform minimally invasive arthroplasty procedures with great accuracy. Patients were all seen in a pre-admission clinic where pre-operative clinical survey data were collected. All patients had standing AP and lateral knee X-rays as well as skyline X-rays pre-operatively. Post-perative full length AP and lateral femur X-rays were completed in order to measure alignment of the femoral component. Patients are being followed post-operatively with SF-36, WOMAC, Knee Society Scores, and X-rays. Patients being operated on with the CT based system had pre operative CT scans. Intra-operatively a DRB was fixed to the patient’s femur and the chosen computer assisted technique was used to direct the rotation of the tibial cut as well as the alignment of the femoral cutting jig. To date we have completed seventeen computer assisted Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasties. The average error in the AP plane using CT based system was 3.2 degrees and 2.1 degrees for the lateral plane. The average error in the AP plane using the fluro-based system was 2.2 degrees and 1.3 degree for the lateral plane. Funding: NSERC, IRIS, ORDCF

Two computer assisted techniques (CT and a fluoro-guide based system) were used to insert the femoral component of the Oxford Unicompartmental Knee arthroplasty. The accuracy and variability of component positioning were compared. Clinical data was collected pre-operatively and is being collected post-operatively. Standing AP and lateral knee X-rays as well as skyline X-rays were collected pre-operatively and post-operative full length AP and lateral femur X-rays were completed in order to measure alignment of the femoral component. Results are showing accurate insertions of the Oxford knee femoral component using both systems. To review two computer-assisted techniques for inserting Oxford Unicompartmental Knee arthroplasties. CT based and fluro based techniques were compared with regards to accuracy and variability of component positioning. Currently we are able to use either a CT based system or a fluro based system to accurately insert the femoral component of the Oxford Unicompartmental Knee arthroplasty. Computer assist techniques are allowing us to perform minimally invasive arthroplasty procedures with great accuracy. Patients were all seen in a pre-admission clinic where pre-operative clinical survey data were collected. All patients had standing AP and lateral knee X-rays as well as skyline X-rays pre-operatively. Post-perative full length AP and lateral femur X-rays were completed in order to measure alignment of the femoral component. Patients are being followed post-operatively with SF-36, WOMAC, Knee Society Scores, and X-rays. Patients being operated on with the CT based system had pre operative CT scans. Intra-operatively a DRB was fixed to the patient’s femur and the chosen computer assisted technique was used to direct the rotation of the tibial cut as well as the alignment of the femoral cutting jig. To date we have completed seventeen computer assisted Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasties. The average error in the AP plane using CT based system was 3.2 degrees and 2.1 degrees for the lateral plane. The average error in the AP plane using the fluro-based system was 2.2 degrees and 1.3 degree for the lateral plane. Funding: NSERC, IRIS, ORDCF

Stereotactic principles used primarily for brain surgery have been developed further and introduced into spine surgery at the beginning of the 1990’s. The system solutions available consist of three components: the surgical object (vertebra), the virtual object (CT-image data of the vertebra), and the navigatorallowing the surgeon to localise the position of the instrument inside the surgical object in real-time. Optoelectronic systems using infrared light emitting diodes and magnetic field based navigators are in use. Lumbar pedicle screw insertion was the first clinical application for this technique. Screws can be positioned safely following a preplanned optimal trajectory or according to the anatomic situation utilising the real-time module intraoperatively. The effectiveness of this new technique has been shown in prospective studies (Schwarzenbach et al 1997, Laine et al 1997, 1999). In a a prospective randomised clinical trial one-hundred consecutive patients were randomly allocated for either conventional (Group 1) or computer assisted (Group 2) pedicle screw insertion. From the computer assisted group nine patients were dropped out. There was no statistical difference between the groups. CT-based optoelectronic navigation was used for screw insertion in Group 2. The screw position in the pedicle was assessed postoperatively by an independent observer with CT. The pedicle perforation rate was 13.4% (37/277 screws) in the conventional group and 4.6% (10/219 screws) in the computer assisted group (P=0.006). The majority of perforations was less than 4 mm. A pedicle perforation of 4 to 6 mm was found in 1.4% (4/277) of the screws in Group 1, and none in Group 2. Intraoperatively, eleven screws were repositioned in Group 1 and none in Group 2. There were no postoperative complications related to screw placement. We conclude that higher accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with computer assisted navigation than with conventional methods could be demonstrated under clinical conditions in a randomised controlled clinical trial. At present CAOS Systems are used also for localisation of intraosseous pathologic processes during biopsies in spine and pelvis, sacroiliac screw fixation and vertebral osteotomies. Refinement of the method for use in minimal invasive and percutaneous procedures is in progress

To describe our experience with computer assisted combined anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and osteotomy. It may provide long-term symptom relief and improved function in patients with medial knee arthrosis and ACL-deficiency, while delaying or possibly eliminating the need for further surgical intervention such as arthroplasty. Two patients who had medial unicompartmental arthrosis and chronic ACL-deficient knees underwent ACL reconstruction along with femoral osteotomy in one case and upper tibial osteotomy in the other. We used Orthopilot software to perform computer assisted combined anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and osteotomy. Subjective evaluation at postoperatively indicated significant improvement compared to preoperative evaluation and better scores for patients who obtained normal knee range of motion. Objective evaluation by International Knee Documentation Committee showed improved score postoperatively. Both had minor complications occurred in the immediate postoperative period. The average correction angle of the osteotomy was 7 degrees (7–10). Computer assisted ACL reconstruction and osteotomy may provide long-term symptomatic pain relief, increased activity and improved function. Only Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction may not effectively provide pain relief to the ACL-deficient knee with degenerative medial arthrosis. The results of this study suggest that combined high tibial or femoral osteotomy and ACL reconstructions are effective in the surgical treatment of varus, ACL-deficient knees with symptomatic medial compartment arthritis. Computer aided surgery allows precise correction of the axial deformity and tunnel orientation intraoperatively