The Cincinnati incision is widely utilized in clubfoot surgery and allows excellent access to the medial, lateral and posterior structures involved. Closure of the skin at the end of the procedure without undue tension may be difficult. Wound necrosis and excessive scarring may occur and may lead to inadequate correction. One alternative is to splint the foot in an initial equines position post-operatively with repeat cast changes to achieve optimal position once soft tissue swelling has decreased. A further method is to leave the wound open and allow it to granulate. The healing and final cosmetic appearance of wounds allowed to heal by granulation following the Cincinnati incision were reviewed. We reviewed 14 feet in 10 patients who had undergone partial closure of the Cincinnati incision following peritalar release. The majority of the children were male and the average age at surgery was 28 weeks. All corrections were performed as primary procedures on patients with idiopathic CTEV. At the end of the procedure an above-knee plaster was applied. The plaster was changed weekly in the outpatients department until the wound had healed. Patients were maintained in plaster for 12 weeks. All final wounds were cosmetically acceptable both to the surgeon and the parents. The widest scar was 3 mm and the average time to heal four weeks. No infection had occurred although two wounds were treated for overgranulation. Partial wound closure of the Cincinnati incision avoids undue tissue tension and allows a fully corrected position of the foot to be maintained at the end of the initial procedure. A second anaesthetic to obtain further correction is therefore avoided. Partial wound closure leaves cosmetically acceptable scarring with minimal complications. Parents should be warned about the initial appearance of the wound but may be reassured regarding final outcome

After gaining experience from 1990 to 2003 using the Cincinnati incision in the surgical treatment of congenital clubfoot, we were able to extend its use to the early surgical treatment of congenital vertical talus (CVT). Eight of the 172 feet were affected by CVT; four were idiopathic, three were associated with arthrogriposis and one with cerebral palsy. The average age of the six children at the time of the operation was 13.5 months (range 6–27 months). We performed a posterior, medial and lateral release of the subtalar joint and of the talona-vicular joint. The reduction of the talus was performed using a K-wire placed through the posterolateral aspect of the talus in its longitudinal axis. After the calcaneus was reduced from its everted position, a second K-wire was placed through the calcaneus and into the talus. The medial talonavicular joint capsule was opened and the redundant capsule reconstructed. Peroneal tendon lengthening was performed in five cases. The radiological evaluation, according to Hamanishi, showed preoperatively a talo-first metatarsal angle of 94° (NV: 3.3 ± 6.4 SD) and a calcaneal-first metatarsal angle of 54° (NV: −9 ± 4.5 SD); postoperatively the values were 24° and 7°, respectively. There were no wound complications or avascular necrosis of the talus. With the Cincinnati incision we were able to visualise the talo-calcaneal and talo-navicular dislocation in all three spatial planes. It also allowed us to correct the deformity in all three mentioned planes and in a single-step procedure

Aim: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term results of Cincinnati incision release in resistant clubfoot. Methods: 130 children with clubfoot deformity were treated at Our lady of Lourdes Hospital, Drogheda, during the four year period from January, 1994, toDecember, 1997. A Cincinnati release was performed on 41 feet in 32 patients with a resistant club-foot deformity. All the children had a previous hind foot release at the age of three months. At the time of surgery the children were aged between 9 months and 1.5 years with one exception. The average follow-up period was 60 months. This approach enabled the surgeon to correct the deformity in all planes simultaneously, with a clearer visualization of the anatomical structures. Emphasis was placed on correcting the foot position to neutral and in particular avoiding over-correction. The corrected foot position was maintained by inserting three pins at the time of surgery, which were removed 6 weeks later. Serial casts were used for a period of 16 weeks. Tarso-pronator boots were used to maintain correction in the ambulant child. Results: Parent satisfaction with the operation was very high and the children tolerated the procedure well with no significant post- operative complications. Using the Magone functional rating system 81% of the feet was good or excellent, with 19% fair results. There were no poor results in our series. All the children were pain free and no child suffered from limitation of daily activities. Conclusion: We conclude that the Cincinnati incision release technique is an effective method of correcting the deformity in resistant clubfeet. With meticulous attention to surgical technique complications can be minimized

On the first to second day after birth, equinus, varus, forefoot adduction, calcaneopedal block derotation degree, reducibility characteristics, creases, cavus and muscle condition are evaluated using the clubfoot severity scale, and a long-leg cast is applied. Casting is preceded by the Ponseti treatment: the first ray is dorsiflexed while maintaining finger pressure on the talar neck just in front of the lateral maleolus in the external rotation and abductus. Immobilization is interrupted by redressive manipulation therapy depending on the clubfoot appearance and parents’ participation. Redressive manual and casting therapies typically provide good correction of the foot; yet the equinus persists in the majority of cases. The undercorrected equinus is the major reason for one-stage surgery, consisting of postero-medial-lateral release, capsulotomies and à-la-carte tendon elongation through the modified Cincinnati incision, done at the age of 7 to 9 months. As a rule forefoot derotation and heel fixation are not necessary. There are no skin problems or oedema, and the child usually stays in hospital only for one day after surgery. The outcome, however, is unpredictable even in a fully corrected foot. After surgery, the foot is regularly checked for a potential adductus, lack of dorsiflexion and cavus, and redressive therapy is promptly instituted. Any residual deformation resistant to conservative measures is treated surgically. In the long term, children should as a rule wear ordinary shoes. A typical reoperation – medial release with sectioning of the plantar fascia – is required in approx.10% of cases. Derotation below the knee and transposition of the tibialis anterior tendon are less frequent. At this Department, complete re-correction is required in less than 1% of cases

Purpose of study: The aim of this study was twofold. Firstly, to compare a subjective clinical with an objective biomechanical assessment of operated clubfeet, using the optical Dynamic Pedobarograph foot pressure system. Secondly, to develop the latter into a classification system for future prospective studies and to complement clinical evaluation of patients, especially those with relapse. Methods and results: Sixteen patients (21 feet) were randomly selected from a pool of patients that had undergone clubfoot surgery. The operations were carried out by a single surgeon and consisted of a lateral-posteromedial peritalar release utilising the Cincinnati incision. Post-operatively, all feet were independently classified using a modified functional outcome scoring system. After completion of treatment, patients were referred to the Foot Pressure Analysis Clinic in Dundee where a novel method has been developed for the evaluation of clubfeet, using a static and dynamic foot pressure analysis system which provide both a graphical and analytical model for comparison. A three point grading scale was developed. The correlation between clinical and biomechanical outcomes in the 21 feet was calculated using Kendall’s tau rank test for non-parametric data. The t value was 0.3524, which was significant (p < 0.05). Conclusion: There is a significant correlation between the above mentioned subjective and objective outcome measurements. Biomechanical assessment can complement, support or change the line of management after clubfoot surgery. This technique has not only proven to be objective but also clinically valuable and cost effective. A prospective study to refine this biomechanical classification into a reliable predictor of relapse in surgically corrected clubfeet is currently being considered

The aim of this study was to correlate two outcome measurements of clubfoot surgery. A modified, partially subjective, clinical scoring system was compared with an objective biomechanical assessment, using the optical Dynamic Pedobarograph foot pressure system. The outcomes of the latter method were developed into a classification system for future prospective studies and to complement clinical evaluation of patients, especially those with relapse. Many different functional outcome measures have been designed. Differing number of points are allocated to various subjective and objective items of relevance. The weighting given to each item in the overall score depends entirely on the importance the surgeon believes that particular item has on what he believes constitutes a good corrected clubfoot. This makes the scoring systems arbitrary and therefore results of clubfoot surgery between various centres impossible to compare. Sixteen patients [21 feet] were randomly selected from a poll of patients that had undergone clubfoot surgery. The operations were carried out by a single surgeon and consisted of a lateral-posteromedial peritalar release utilising the Cincinnati incision. Post-operatively, all feet were independently classified using a modified scoring system, based on the ones designed by Laaveg and Ponseti and the one by McKay, which scores both objective and subjective findings. This system has a good interobserver reproducibility. After finalisation of treatment, patients were referred to the Foot Pressure Analysis Clinic in Dundee where a novel method has been developed for the evaluation of clubfeet, using a static and dynamic foot pressure analysis system which provides both a graphical and analytical model for comparison. A pedobarographic classification system was developed. An excellent result entails that the patient does not require further treatment. A good result has been achieved if a near normal posture and pressure distribution is recorded. However, this means that there are still functional problems, which, as the foot matures, may lead to future relapse. These feet may therefore require long-term treatment with an orthotic support to let the foot develop its normal shape. A fair result requires major orthotic support of shoe adaptation, or further surgical releases. The correlation between clinical and biomechanical outcomes in the 21 feet was calculated using Kendall’s tau rank test for non-parametric data. The r value was 0.3524, which was significant [p< 0.05]. There is a significant correlation between the above mentioned outcome measurements. Biomechanical assessment cannot replace clinical evaluation, but can complement it and perhaps give a more subtle and earlier prediction of the need for further additional treatment. This technique has not only proven to be objective but also clinically valuable and cost effective. A prospective study to refine this biomechanical classification system into a reliable predictor of relapse in surgically corrected clubfeet is currently being considered