Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_18 | Pages 8 - 8
1 Apr 2013
Dunkerley S Cosker T Kitson J Bunker T Smith C
Full Access

The Delto-pectoral approach is the workhorse of the shoulder surgeon, but surprisingly the common variants of the cephalic vein and deltoid artery have not been documented. The vascular anatomy encountered during one hundred primary elective delto-pectoral approaches was documented and common variants described. Two common variants are described. A type I (71%), whereby the deltoid artery crosses the interval and inserts directly in to the deltoid musculature. In this variant the surgeon is unlikely to encounter any vessels crossing the interval apart from the deltoid artery itself. In a type II pattern (21%) the deltoid artery runs parallel to the cephalic vein on the deltoid surface and is highly likely to give off medial branches (95%) that cross the interval, as well as medial tributaries to the cephalic vein (38%). Knowledge of the two common variants will aid the surgeon when dissecting the delto-pectoral approach and highlights that these vessels crossing the interval are likely to be arterial, rather than venous. This study allows the surgeon to recognize these variations and reproduce bloodless, safe and efficient surgery


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_17 | Pages 21 - 21
1 Nov 2016
Sperling J
Full Access

The standard approach is through the deltopectoral interval. Among patients with prior incisions, one makes every effort to either utilise the old incision or to incorporate it into a longer incision that will allow one to approach the deltopectoral interval and retract the deltoid laterally. The deltopectoral interval is most easily developed just distal to the clavicle, where there is a natural infraclavicular triangle of fat that separates the deltoid and pectoralis major muscles even in very scarred or stiff shoulders. Typically, the deltoid is retracted laterally leaving the cephalic vein on the medial aspect of the exposure. The anterior border of the deltoid is mobilised from the clavicle to its insertion on the humerus. The anterior portion of the deltoid insertion together with the more distal periosteum of the humerus may be elevated slightly. The next step is to identify the plane between the conjoined tendon group and the subscapularis muscle. Dissection in this area must be done very carefully due to the close proximity of the neurovascular group, the axillary nerve, and the musculocutaneous nerve. Scar is then released from around the base of the coracoid. The subacromial space is freed of scar and the shoulder is examined for range of motion. Particularly among patients with prior rotator cuff surgery, there may be severe scarring in the subacromial space. Internal rotation of the arm with dissection between the remaining rotator cuff and deltoid is critical to develop this plane. If external rotation is less than 30 degrees, one can consider incising the subscapularis off bone rather than through its tendinous substance. For every 1 cm that the subscapularis is advanced medially, one gains approximately 20 to 30 degrees of external rotation. The rotator interval between the subscapularis and supraspinatus is then incised. This release is then continued inferiorly to incise the inferior shoulder capsule from the neck of the humerus. This is performed by proceeding from anterior to posterior with progressive external rotation of the humerus staying directly on the bone with electrocautery and great care to protect the axillary nerve. The key for glenoid exposure as well as improvement in motion is deltoid mobilization, a large inferior capsular release, aggressive humeral head cut and osteophyte removal


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 88-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 316 - 316
1 May 2006
Rothwell A
Full Access

The aim was to study the outcome of the vein wrap technique in the treatment of post carpal tunnel causalgia (CRPS type II). Five patients with a diagnosis of post carpal tunnel release causalgia were treated with the vein wrap technique. This involves performing an extended carpal tunnel release gently freeing all nerve adhesions and then wrapping the endothelial surface of a longitudinally split segment of the cephalic vein around the median nerve from proximal to the carpal tunnel to the commencement of the distal divisions. The wrap is secured with 6.0 Novafil sutures. Post surgery the wrist and hand are supported in a volar slab and bandage for two weeks followed by patient managed mobilising exercises. There were three females and two males with follow-up ranging from six months to three years. Time from onset of causalgia to surgery ranged from 6 months to 13 years. In three patients there was immediate and profound relief of causalgic symptoms; in one, symptoms completely resolved over six weeks and in one, in which the nerve had been severely crushed prior to initial surgery, the causalgic symptoms markedly improved but the post injury numbness has persisted. In none has there been recurrence or deterioration. Post carpal tunnel release causalgia is a devastating and disabling complication. It is often resistant to a range of treatment modalities but the vein wrap is a simple procedure which in the author’s experience can be dramatically effective even in patients with very long standing causalgia