One of the drawbacks of cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) is aseptic loosening after long period, major reason for which is bioinertness of PMMA bone cement. To improve longevity of THA, interface bio-active bone cement technique combined with modern cementing technique has been used in our institute, and was evaluated clinically and radiologically. The present study includes 44 cases of primary THA with an average age at operation of 64 years old (ranging 48 to 81). Mean postoperative follow up period was 4 (ranging 3.5 to 5) years. Pre- and postoperative evaluation using Merle d’Aubigné score were 8.0 and 16.2 points, respectively. Postoperative cementing grade using Barrack’s classification was A or B. At final follow up, radiolucent line at bone-cement interface was not observed, except one case of rheumatoid arthritis patient at zone 3 described by Delee and Charnley in the acetabular side. Neither osteolysis nor loosening was observed in every case. No major complications, such as infection, dislocation, pulmonary embolization, were observed. The present study revealed excellent short-term result was obtained by IBBC technique combined with modern cementing technique for primary THAs. Most important technical point required for IBBC is to obtain dry bony surface just before cementing. Compressive reamed bone and gauze packing was effective for complete hemostasis just before cementing for the acetabular side, and plugging the isthmus using bone chips was effective for reducing bleeding for the femoral side

Aim. To compare radiological and clinical outcomes between triceps-detaching and triceps-sparing approaches in total elbow arthroplasty, with specific focus on cementing technique and post-operative range of motion. Methods. A retrospective review was completed of medical records and radiographs of 56 consecutively managed patients who underwent a primary total elbow arthroplasty between 2000 and 2012 at a tertiary hospital. Rheumatoid Arthritis was the predominant pathology (47/56). Data analysed included patient demographics, range of motion pre-operatively and at various stages post-operatively, approach utilized, operative time and complications. Cementing technique was graded as adequate, marginal or inadequate according to Morrey's criteria. Results. 12 patients were lost to follow-up or had incomplete records, leaving 44 patients for analysis. 15 patients had a triceps-sparing approach, and 29 had a variation of a triceps-detaching approach. Average follow-up was 56.1 months. Flexion range of motion in the triceps-sparing group improved from 25°–122° (±19.6°) pre-op to 10°–140° (±22.5°) at final follow-up, and in the triceps-detaching group from 41°–104° (± 22.2°) pre-op to 27°–129° (±35.0°) at final follow-up. Tourniquet time averaged 85.4 (±17.0) minutes for the triceps-sparing group and 96.1 (±22.6) minutes for the triceps-detaching group. The complication rate in the triceps-sparing group was 13.3%, and included one olecranon fracture and one case of superficial wound sepsis. The complication rate for the triceps-detaching group was 24.1%, and included one patient with persistent ulnar nerve symptoms requiring transposition, one medial condyle fracture and five triceps ruptures. Three patients who had attempted repairs of the rupture developed deep infections requiring multiple further surgeries. Cementing technique was adequate in 91.7% in the triceps-sparing group and in 70.6% in the triceps-detaching group and marginal in the remainder of the cohort. Conclusion. A triceps-sparing approach results in a predictable improvement in range of motion with no compromise of the cement mantle. NO DISCLOSURES

There exists a lot literature referring to the cementing technique of hip replacements, but when talking about longevity of knee prostheses only seldom the cementing technique is mentioned even though 90% of the knees are cemented. Especially the tibial component, that has to cope with different forces such as pressure, rotation, tilt and sliding, is said to last longer when cemented. Cementing Technique: There are many aspects that need to be thought of when cementing knee prostheses:. The preparation of the bone: The preparation of the surface of the bone is of great importance, as the-bond of the cement with the bone is by the shape of the surfaces and not by a chemical reaction. A good penetration of the cement into the cancellous-bone enlarges the connecting surface and optimizes the power transmission. The pulse-lavage is the most effective to open the spongy bone. Sclerotic bone needs to be penetrated. Selection of cement: PMMA-cement (Polymeth-ylmetacrylat) is used with proven effectiveness since 1958 (Charnley). Very Similar to the well known cement Palacos (BiometMerck) is the new SmartSet GHV (DePuy) but it provides a longer time for processing, which is useful when cementing all components in one go. Mixing and hardening time are therefore shorter. Mixing of the cement: Mixing is mostly done manually even though it is known that the quality of the cement is minor than with a vacuum system. The advances of such a system are better microporosity, no air bubbles, and safety for the staff, who breathe less fumes. Application of cement – viscosity: The cement can be applied to the prosthesis or directly onto the bone. If the implant is precoated, the viscosity of the cement should be low to achieve better joint. The bone should in any case be dry to avoid mixing with blood. Pressure: During implantation a short high pressure is of importance for the depth of penetration. Some implants have an edge to guarantee better distribution of the pressure. During the hardening of the cement the pressure has to b ekept at a certain level as the volume of the cement changes a bit during the polimerisation. Hardening: The pressure needs to be controlled avoiding small movements. When cementing all components at once the ligaments have to be balanced, otherwise unnoticed deviations might occur. The leg should not be hyperextended to avoid tilting of the components. Temperature of polimerisation: The temperature can be reduced in vivo by cooling of the bone or the cement and by good spongy bone that transports the temperature away. If the cement penetrates more than 5 mm or its homogeneous thickness is more than 3mm osteonecrosis is likely to occur. Thickness of cement layer: Several authors and the finite element measurements found out, that acement layer from 2–5 mm ensures good stability for the tibial component. Cementing the shaft does not lead to significant better results but may lead to atrophy of the bone underneath the tibial plateau. Femoral components show good results also uncemented. Excess of cement: Cement that juts out must be removed especially in the dorsal parts, where an impingement can be produced. Bits in the soft tissue must also be removed with care. Cement should not touch the polyethylene during the whole procedure. Antibiotics: The quality and longevity of the cement is reduced by adding antibiotics because of resulting higher porosity. A special management for risk patientsis necessary. When cementing knee prostheses one should give high attention to the cementing technique as especially a good anchorage of the tibial component will lead to longevity of the implant

Aims

Aseptic loosening is the most common cause of failure following cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and has been linked to poor cementation technique. We aimed to develop a consensus on the optimal technique for component cementation in TKA.

Introduction: The medial unicompartmental knee prosthesis (UKA) is less invasive than total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and preserves undamaged structures of the joint. The range of movement and recovery are better in UKA, while postoperative pain reduction is at least equal to TKA. UKA have a higher revision rate than TKA (15% vs 10% after 10 years). One main reason for revision is mechanical loosening¹. There is a paucity of information regarding cement fixation of UKA. We compared jet lavage to conventional lavage with focus on cement pressures, interface temperatures and cement penetration.

Materials and Methods: UKA was performed in 10 paired entire human cadaver legs (Oxford Phase III, Biomet, Dordrecht, NL). Customized tibial implants and a pressure probe insert were used to measure the cement pressure anterior, posterior and near the implant fin during implantation and polymerisation. A drilling and fixation jig was used for standardized positioning of the three temperature probes. The polymerization heat was measured 5 mm below the bone surface at the medial and lateral plateau as well as under the fin. The same cementing technique was performed for all knees using Refobacin^® Bone Cement R. One side of the paired knees was cleaned using jet lavage, contra lateral cleaning was done with conventional lavage. The lavage volume was equal for both

Methods: AP radiographs were taken and digitalized to quantify the cement penetration areas and depths, using a pixel-analysis-software. Group comparisons were done with the Wilcoxon-Test using SPSS (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois).

Results: Average cement pressure under the tibial implant is significantly higher for conventional lavage (avg cement pressure 25.69 ± 17.85 kPa, p= 0.005) than for jet lavage (avg cement pressure 13.28 ± 12.82 kPa). Mean temperature increase measured 5 mm below the bone surface medial and lateral, as well as under the implant fin, were statistically significant higher for the cementing technique with jet lavage (lat. 14.10 ± 5.72°C, p= 0.018/med. 8.49 ± 4.20°C, p= 0.176/fin 5.95 ± 1.92°C, p= 0.063) than for the conventional lavage (lat. 9.42 ± 5.17°C/med. 6.42 ± 2.21°C/fin 3.96 ± 2.03°C). On AP radiographs, cement penetration areas under the tibial implant were significantly higher for jet lavage (penetration area: 122.15 ± 33.94 sq mm, p= 0.046) than for conventional lavage (penetration area: 89.82 ± 23.92 sq mm).

Discussion: The use of jet lavage showed clear advantages in our cadaver studies. Jet lavage resulted in higher cement penetration despite of lower cement pressures under the tibial implant. The higher cement penetration lead to higher interface temperatures but exposure to high temperatures over 50 °C with a risk for bone necrosis could not be measured.

Aims

Highly polished stems with force-closed design have shown satisfactory clinical results despite being related to relatively high early migration. It has been suggested that the minimal thickness of cement mantles surrounding the femoral stem should be 2 mm to 4 mm to avoid aseptic loosening. The line-to-line cementing technique of the femoral stem, designed to achieve stem press-fit, challenges this opinion. We compared the migration of a highly polished stem with force-closed design by standard and line-to-line cementing to investigate whether differences in early migration of the stems occur in a clinical study.

Introduction

Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) is currently one of the most widely performed surgical procedures in clinical orthopaedic practice. Despite the recorded number of uncemented implants has steadily increased in recent years, cemented fixation still remains the benchmark in THA, accounting for most of the procedures performed nowadays. The Friendly Short is a novel cemented short-stem that grants a less invasive and more bone conservative approach due to its shortened height and innovative cementing technique. It is indicated to treat elderly patients with the aim of preserving bone diaphysis while decreasing postoperative recovery times. Its instrument set allows to optimize the cement mantle thickness via an improved pressurization and stem centralization system.

Introduction

Aseptic loosening has been reported to be the most common, contemporary mode of total knee arthroplasty failure. It has been suggested that the etiology of revision due to loosening can be attributed, in part, to joint imbalance and the variability inherent in standard surgical techniques. Due to the high prevalence of revision, the purpose of this study was to quantify the change in kinetic loading of the knee joint before versus after the application of the final cement-component complex.

INTRODUCTION

The cement quantity and distribution within femoral hip resurfacings are important for implant survival. Too much cement could cause thermal bone necrosis during polymerisation. Insufficient cement and cement-implant interfacial gaps might favour mechanical loosening. Exposed cancellous bone within the implant, might facilitate debris-induced osteolysis. This study assessed the impact of the cementing technique on the cement mantle quality in hip resurfacing.

Introduction: Stem alignment and cement mantle thickness influence stress distribution on the cement-bone and the bone-cement interfaces. Malposition of the implant and an incomplete cement mantle can lead to suboptimal long-term results. The proximal and distal centralisers that are currently available have shown severe limitations in their clinical application and do not centralise the stem in the lateral plane.

Aim: To evaluate a new stem-positioning system.

Method: One hundred Friendly (Lima LTO) stems implanted between October 1999 and October 2000 have been evaluated radiographically for stem centralisation and cement mantle thickness in both projections. One surgeon used the same technique in all patients and employed a newly designed set of proximal and distal centralisers.

Results: All cases had an acceptable and complete cement mantle. In only seven cases cement thickness was below 2mm in Gruen zone 14. Stem-bone contact was never observed. No patient had migration of the distal plug during pressurisation or complete cement defects. In eight cases mild (2 degrees to 4 degrees) valgus deviation of the stem was found. None of the distal centralisers failed whilst one of the proximal centralisers broke during insertion of the stem without influencing the final result.

Discussion: Cementing the stem is the most delicate phase of cemented total hip replacement. The use of proximal and distal centralisers is mandatory to prevent malposition which in turn results in incomplete cement mantle. The system employed in this series appears accurate and reproducible for stem alignment.

The ‘cement reaction’ is a recognised cardio-respiratory response to methylmethacrylate bone cement, characterised by hypotension, reduced cardiac output, and on occasion fatal circulatory collapse. It is seen in 0.5-1% of cemented hip arthroplasties during the insertion and pressurisation of cement into the femur, and is believed to be secondary to marrow thromboembolism, the vasodilatory effect of methylmethacrylate, or a combination of the two. A number of steps, within the operating surgeon's control, can be undertaken to reduce the risk of the ‘cement reaction’ occurring.

An e-mail based questionnaire was sent to all trainees and consultants in the West of Scotland containing eight questions relating to cementing technique when performing hemiarthroplasty of the hip. The questions related to measures to reduce the potential for ‘cement reaction’, e.g.: whether or not they routinely use a cement restrictor.

Seventy-two complete replies were received. For five of the eight measures, the surgeons routinely employed the suggested practices. For the remaining three, the consensus opinion was contrary to the suggested practice for reduction of the risk of ‘cement reaction’. These were with respect to the surgical approach employed, whether or not to attempt to remove all cancellous bone from the proximal femur, and the use, or not, of a venting tube during cement insertion. In all three cases, the difference was statistically significant on chi-squared testing.

The cohort of surgeons questioned routinely employ more than half of the methods suggested to reduce the potential for ‘cement reaction’ in hemiarthroplasty of the hip. Further surveys of why they do, or do not, undertake certain practices during cementing would help improve awareness of ‘cement reaction’, and perhaps reduce the incidence of this potentially fatal phenomenon.

Introduction: In recent retrieval studies over-penetration of cement, incomplete seating of the prosthesis with a resultant polar cement mass, or both, have been associated with femoral failures of current generation resurfacing arthroplasties. We developed a laboratory model to analyze differences in cement penetration, cement pressures and interface temperatures for hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Materials and Methods: A carbon foam was demonstrated to closely simulate human femoral heads. Custom aluminum shells were made by DePuy with the same inner geometry as the femoral resurfacing components. (ASR™ system, Size 49, DePuy; Leeds, England).

Analyses of six different cementing techniques (cemtech) were performed using high viscosity (HVC) (Smart Set GHV, DePuy, Blackpool, England) and low viscosity cement (LVC) (Endurance, DePuy, Blackpool, England):

Manual application HVC

A force of 150N was used to press five shells in each cemtech group on foam specimens. During seating cement pressures and polymerization heat 5 mm under the foam surface were measured.

Specimens were cut into quarters, surfaces were digitalized and cement penetration areas and depths were quantified using a pixel-analysis-software. The effects of the cemtech were examined by Kruscal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney-U-tests (two-sided, p-value< 0.05, SPSS)

Results: The mean cement pressures increased going from cemtech A to E. HVC cemtech C and E showed higher pressures than the comparable LVC cemtech B and D.

Maximum temperatures were A) 36.0± 4.1°C, B) 45.0±5.7°C, C) 36.2±4.2°C, D) 53.5±2.5°C, E) 48.3±6.5°C and F) 53.2±12.6°C. D, E and F exceeded 50°C.

A provided even cement penetration over the available fixation area without involvement of the internal area and the stem. Cemtech that used LVC cement (B, D and F) showed higher interior area cement contents than HVC (A, E and C). The cement content in the interior area was A) 39.3±26.4mm2, B) 72.1±16.9mm2, C) 37.7±10.5mm2, D) 99.0±24.6mm2, E) 67.5±15.6mm2 and F) 121.0±29.0mm2.

A showed mainly complete seating with a cement mantle thickness of 0.5±0.7 mm. All other cemtech had incomplete seating in all specimens with significantly thicker polar cement mantles (p=0.032) up to a maximum of 4.6±1.2mm for E.

Discussion: Component filling cemtech and LVC resulted in variable degrees of over-penetration, exposure to high temperatures or a risk for incomplete seating, which have been associated with bone necrosis and early fracture. The use of the manual application and HVC cement showed clear advantages in our model. It was possible to utilize all of the available fixation area without negative effects.

Introduction

Hip resurfacing arthroplasty has gained popularity as an alternative for total hip arthroplasty. Usually, cemented fixation is used for the femoral component. However, each type of resurfacing design has its own recommended cementing technique.

In a recent investigation the effect of various cementing techniques on cement mantle properties was studied. This study showed distinct differences in cement mantle volume, filling index and morphology.

In this study, we investigated the effect of these cement mantle variations on the heat generation during polymerization, and its consequences in terms of thermal bone necrosis.

Aseptic loosening of the acetabular component is the major long-term complication of cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA). Failure of the acetabular cup occurs two to three times more frequently than failure of the femoral component. Third generation cementing techniques have improved the longevity of cemented components in THA. Although suction venting of the femoral shaft is a well-recognised practice, venting of the acetabulum during the cementing process has been little studied. This prospective study sets out to evaluate the effect of iliac wing vacuum aspiration on cement penetration of the acetabulum. Forty patients (Male 18, Female 22) aged 19–82 years (average 67+12 years) undergoing primary THA were entered consecutively into two study groups (20 hips per group). Reasons for THA included osteoarthritis (35) acetabular Dysplasia (2), rheumatoid arthritis (1), perthes (1) and conversion THA post dynamic screw (1)> A single consultant surgeon performed all procedures in a standard operating room with laminar flow. A posterior approach was used in all hips. Third generation cementing techniques were used for acetabular component insertion. Twenty-six millimetres internal diameter Charnley ogee LPW polyethylene cups (Depuy) with varying external diameters [43 mm (9), 47 mm (24), 50 mm (5) and 53 mm (3)] were used and implanted with “Simplex” polymethylmethacrylate cement (Howmedica). Group 1 underwent acetabular cement pressurisation for sixty seconds prior to insertion of cup. Group 2 underwent pressurisation with simultaneous vacuum suction of the ipsilateral ilium using an Exeter iliac wing aspirator. Pre-and post-operative haemoglobin values were recorded for all patients. Standard post-operative radiographs were reviewed blindly to assess penetration of cement. A custom-made template facilitated measurement of depth (mm) of cement penetration in three areas corresponding with Delee-Charnley acetabular zones. Cement penetration was enhanced in all zones following iliac wing vacuum aspiration. The effect of venting was statistically significant (zone I 21.1+6.4mm v 12.8+2.8mm. zone II 7.0+2.4mm v 5.5+2.0mm, zone III 5.3+2.4mm v 4.2+1.4mm). The bone cement mantle interface was also completely obliterated following iliac wing aspiration.

Aim

To undertake a biomechanical study to determine the existence of any difference in the early tibial component fixation to bone, between two widely used techniques of cementation, which may confer an influence on implant survival.

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to compare using a novel cementing technique with hydroxyapatite granules at bone-cement interface with using the 3^rd cementing technique on the acetabular component.

Femoral cement-in-cement revision is a well described technique to reduce morbidity and complications in hip revision surgery. Traditional techniques for septic revision necessitate removal of all bone cement from the femur. In our two institutions, we have been using a cement-in-cement technique, leaving the distal femoral cement in selected cases for septic hip revision surgery. Between February 2010 and September 2019, 89 patients with prosthetic hip infection underwent first or single stage procedures leaving the distal femoral cement in situ and performing a cement-in-cement revision. The mean patient age was 72.0 years (24–92). The median time from the last arthroplasty procedure was 29.0 months (1–294). 81 patients underwent revision using a cemented Exeter stem, 7 patients received an articulating spacer, and one patient underwent excision arthroplasty with the distal cement left in situ. Patients received clinical and radiographic follow-up with a mean of 42.8 months (range 11.0–120.1 months). Oxford hip scores were collected from each institution's existing databases. 9 patients (10.1%) died within one year of surgery. No deaths were directly related to joint infection or the surgery. One patient was lost to follow up before one year. Of the remainder, 7 patients (8.9%) required further procedures for infection and were therefore considered to be treatment failures. 6 patients (7.6%) underwent planned second stage procedures with no recurrence of infection. 7 patients (8.9%) had further surgery for non-infective reasons. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of infection free survival at one year was 93.7% (95% CI 88.4 to 99.0%). No patients underwent revision for stem loosening. Oxford hip scores were available at over one year postoperatively for 51 patients with a mean score of 30.6, and a mean gain of 11.9. In our combined cohort of patients, cement-in-cement revision had an infection eradication rate of 91.1%. Patient selection is crucial, and the procedure can only be performed when there is a well-fixed cement mantle. However, when strict criteria are followed, this technique offers potential significant benefits to surgeons performing this challenging surgery, and more importantly the patients undergoing them

The Exeter Trauma Stem (ETS) is a monoblock unipolar prosthesis currently in use throughout various orthopaedic departments. It can be a useful procedure for specialty trainees in developing modern cementation techniques in hip arthroplasty. We propose that in order for this procedure to be a valid training tool that, as well as having a standardized surgical approach and operative technique, outcomes should be easily assessed and should be similar if performed by either a trainee or consultant. All ETS procedures carried out at our institution from January 2009 until September 2011 were reviewed retrospectively. Patient demographics and operative details were recorded from patient notes. Radiographic evaluation involved the Barrack cementation grading system, Dorr's criteria, stem alignment and leg length measurement. There was no significant difference in operative time between ETS performed by consultant or by specialty trainee. On postoperative x-ray, cement mantles were Barrack grade A or B in 55.6% (trainees) versus 61.9% (consultants). Stem alignment was neutral in 50% and varus in 50% of cases for trainees, versus 28.6% and 71.4% of cases for consultants. In total, 69.2 % of patients had lengthening of the operated limb with a mean increase of 10.4mm (2–25) for trainees and 9.3mm (2–18) for consultants. Both trainees and consultants can attain a good cement mantle. However, from our results stem alignment is less accurate by trainees with half being placed in varus. Our results highlight the difficulty of obtaining correct leg length positioning with the ETS with trainees and consultants having similar discrepancies. The ETS is a useful procedure for orthopaedic trainees to attain adequate skills in modern cementation techniques with similar post-operative radiographic outcomes to consultants. The tendency for trainees to be less accurate with stem positioning could be improved with supervision or careful pre-operative templating

Purpose. Exeter stem was introduced to Japanese market at 1996. Since then, owing to its excellent clinical results, the number of the stem used has been increased year by year and more than 2000 stems have been implanted during the year 2009. The present study aims to prove its efficacy for Japanese patients by evaluating short term results of four major dedicated hip centers. Method. We present the short-term multi-center results of primary THA with Exeter stem combined with modern cementing technique in 881 patients (1000 hips). The average age of the patients at operation was 62.3years (ranging 23 to 89 years). Mean postoperative follow up period was 4.0 (ranging 2 to 9) years. Results. Intraoperative complications such as femoral fracture were observed in 6 hips. Postoperative cementing grade using Barrack's classification was judged as A for 735 hips, as B for 246 hips, and as C for 4 hips, respectively. Twenty-four patients died with unrelated disease and 52 patients were lost during follow-up period. Follow-up ratio was 94.8%. Thirty postoperative complications which include 9 infections, 14 dislocations, 5 deep vein thrombosis, and 2 sciatic nerve palsies were observed. Symptomatic pulmonary embolization or femoral fracture was not observed. Re-operations for infection and dislocation were performed for 8 and 6 hips, respectively. At the final follow-up, no radiolucent line at bone-cement interface was observed. Cortical hypertrophy was observed in 9.6% at Gruen zone 2 to 6. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis predicted a rate of survival at 5 years of 100% with radiolucent line at bone-cement interface of the femur as the endpoint, and of 98.8% when re-operation for any reason was used. Conclusion. The present study revealed excellent short-term result was obtained using Exeter stem combined with modern cementing technique for primary THAs in Japan

Objectives. Previous studies have evidenced cement-in-cement techniques as reliable in revision arthroplasty. Commonly, the original cement mantle is reshaped, aiding accurate placement of the new stem. Ultrasonic devices selectively remove cement, preserve host bone, and have lower cortical perforation rates than other techniques. As far as the authors are aware, the impact of ultrasonic devices on final cement-in-cement bonds has not been investigated. This study assessed the impact of cement removal using the Orthosonics System for Cemented Arthroplasty Revision (OSCAR; Orthosonics) on final cement-in-cement bonds. Methods. A total of 24 specimens were manufactured by pouring cement (Simplex P Bone Cement; Stryker) into stainless steel moulds, with a central rod polished to Stryker Exeter V40 specifications. After cement curing, the rods were removed and eight specimens were allocated to each of three internal surface preparation groups: 1) burr; 2) OSCAR; and 3) no treatment. Internal holes were recemented, and each specimen was cut into 5 mm discs. Shear testing of discs was completed by a technician blinded to the original grouping, recording ultimate shear strengths. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was completed, inspecting surfaces of shear-tested specimens. Results. The mean shear strength for OSCAR-prepared specimens (33.6 MPa) was significantly lower than for the control (46.3 MPa) and burr (45.8 MPa) groups (p < 0.001; one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s post hoc analysis). There was no significant difference in shear strengths between control and burr groups (p = 0.57). Scanning electron microscopy of OSCAR specimens revealed evidence of porosity undiscovered in previous studies. Conclusion. Results show that the cement removal technique impacts on final cement-in-cement bonds. This in vitro study demonstrates significantly weaker bonds when using OSCAR prior to recementation into an old cement mantle compared with cement prepared with a burr or no treatment. This infers that care must be taken in surgical decision-making regarding cement removal techniques used during cement-in-cement revision arthroplasty, suggesting that the risks and benefits of ultrasonic cement removal need consideration. Cite this article: A. Liddle, M. Webb, N. Clement, S. Green, J. Liddle, M. German, J. Holland. Ultrasonic cement removal in cement-in-cement revision total hip arthroplasty: What is the effect on the final cement-in-cement bond? Bone Joint Res 2019;8:246–252. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.86.BJR-2018-0313.R1