The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of graft-tunnel mismatch (GTM) when performing anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using bone-patella tendon-bone (BPTB) grafts and anteromedial portal drilling. Beginning in November 2018, 100 consecutive patients who underwent ACLR by two sports fellowship-trained, orthopedic surgeons using BPTB autograft and anteromedial portal drilling were prospectively identified. The BPTB graft dimensions and the femoral tunnel distance, tibial tunnel distance, intra-articular distance, and total distance were measured. Surgeons determined the depth and angle of tunnels based on the patella tendon graft length dimensions in each case. After passage of the graft, the distance from the distal graft tip to the tibial cortex aperture was measured. GTM was defined as the need for additional measures to obtain satisfactory tibial graft fixation (< 1 5e20 mm of bone fixation). The incidence of mismatch was 6/100 (6%). Five cases involved the graft being too long, with the tibial bone plug protruding excessively from the tibial tunneld4/5 had a patella tendon length ? 50 mm. Three cases were managed with femoral tunnel recession, and two were treated with a free bone plug technique. One patient with a patella tendon length of 35 mm had a graft that was too short, with the tibial bone plug recessed in the tibial tunnel. Of patients whose tibial tunnel distance was within 5 mm of the patella tendon length, only 1/46 (2%) patients had mismatch, whereas 5/54 (9%) of patients who had >5 mm difference had mismatch. The incidence of grafttunnel mismatch after anatomic ACLR using BTPB and anteromedial portal drilling in this study is 6%. To limit the occurrence of GTM where the graft is too long, surgeons should drill tibial tunnel distances within 5 mm of the patella tendon length

Purpose: To evaluate the differencies in graft orientation between transtibial and anteromedial portal technique using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Materials and Methods: Fifty one patients who undergoing arthroscopically ACL reconstruction underwent MRI of their reconstructed knee. Thirty patients had ACL reconstruction using the transtibial technique (group A) while in the rest 21 the anteromedial technique (group B) was used. In the femoral part graft orientation was evaluated using the femoral graft angle (FGA). The FGA was depicted at the coronal views by two axes: the anatomical axis of the femur and the axis of the femoral tunnel. In the tibial part graft orientation was evaluated using the tibial graft angle (TGA). The TGA was specified as the angle between the axis of the graft and a line parallel to the tibial plateau at the sagittal view. Results: The mean FGA for group A was 12.52° while for the group B was 27.06°. This difference was statistically significant (p< 0.001 paired t-test). The mean TGA for group A was 64.24° while for the group B was 63.11° but this was not statistically significant. Conclusions: Using the anteromedial portal technique the ACL graft is placed in a more oblique direction in comparison with the transtibial technique in the femoral part. This may have an impact in rotatory knee stability. However, there are no differencies between the two techniques in graft orientation in the tibial part

Correct femoral tunnel position in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is critical in obtaining good clinical outcomes. We aimed to delineate whether any difference exists between the anteromedial (AM) and trans-tibial (TT) portal femoral tunnel placement techniques on the primary outcome of ACLR graft rupture. Adult patients (>18year old) who underwent primary ACLR between January 2011 – January 2018 were identified and divided based on portal technique (AM v TT). The primary outcome measure was graft rupture. Univariate analysis was used to delineate association between independent variables and outcome. Binary logistic regression was utilised to delineate odds ratios of significant variables. 473 patients were analysed. Median age at surgery was 27 years old (range 18–70). A total of 152/473, (32.1%) patients were AM group compared to 321/473 (67.9%) TT. Twenty-five patients (25/473, 5.3%) sustained graft rupture. Median time to graft rupture was 12 months (IQR 9). A higher odds for graft rupture was associated with the AM group, which trended towards significance (OR 2.03; 95% CI 0.90 – 4.56, p=0.081). Older age at time of surgery was associated with a lower odds of rupture (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.86 – 0.98, p=0.014). There is no statistically significant difference in ACLR graft rupture rates when comparing anteromedial and trans-tibial portal technique for femoral tunnel placement. There was a trend towards higher rupture rates in the anteromedial portal group

The aim of this study was to determine current practice in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction amongst BASK members. This was an internet-based survey where members were invited to complete a questionnaire on ACL reconstruction. Of the 365 BASK surgeons performing ACL reconstruction, 241 completed the questionnaire (response rate 66%). 147(61%) of surgeons used both hamstring and patellar tendon grafts, 71(29%) used only hamstrings and 21(9%) used patellar tendon only. All surgeons used ipsilateral autograft. 157 (65%) used the transtibial technique for femoral tunnel placement with 80(33%) using the anteromedial portal technique. Of those using the anteromedial portal, the most common femoral fixation devices were the Endobutton (34%) and RCI screw (34%). Interference screw fixation (81%) was the most common tibial fixation in the same group of surgeons with the RCI screw being the most common (63%). 19% (45/241) of surgeons were performing double bundle ACL reconstructions in select cases. Hamstring femoral fixation was with a suspension device in 79% and interference screw in 18%. Of those using a suspension device the Endobutton was most common (48%) followed by Transfix (26%) and Rigidfix (19%). Tibial fixation was most commonly achieved by interference screw (57%) followed by Intrafix (30%). With patellar tendon graft the most popular femoral fixation was with an interference screw (66%) followed by suspension (34%). All surgeons used interference screw for tibial fixation. 90% of surgeons (217) allow immediate full weight-bearing as tolerated irrespective of fixation type with 8% delaying full weight bearing between 1 and 3 weeks. The results show the wide spread of variation in practice of ACL reconstruction. With recent renewed interest in a more anatomic placement of tunnels, the use of the anteromedial portal may continue to increase. With such a wide variation in techniques, grafts and fixation implants used, a register may help assess outcomes

The aim of the this study was to determine the effect of the knee flexion angle (KFA) during tibial anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft fixation on patient reported outcomes, graft stability, extension loss and re-operation following anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction. All 169 included patients (mean age 28.5 years, 65% male) were treated with anatomic single bundle ACL reconstruction using patellar tendon autograft and randomized to tibial fixation of the ACL graft at either 0o (n=85) or 30o (n=84). The primary outcome was the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) two years following surgery. Secondary outcomes were the Marx Activity Scale (MAS), the rate of re-operation, and physical exam findings at one year including KT-1000 and side to side differences in knee extension. The follow-up rate was 82% (n=139) for the primary outcome. Graft failure rate at two years was 1% (n=2, 1 per group). ACL tibial graft fixation at 0o or 30o did not have a significant effect on KOOS scores at two years following ACLR. Patients whose graft was fixed at a knee flexion angle of 0o had greater scores on the Marx Activity Scale (mean 9.6 [95%CI 8.5-10.6] versus 8.0 [95%CI 6.9-9.1, p=0.04) and a greater proportion of patients who achieved the minimal clinical important difference (MCID) for the KOOS pain subscale (94% vs 81%, p=0.04). There was no significant difference in knee extension loss, KT-1000 measurements or re-operation between the two groups. In the setting of anatomic single-bundle ACLR using patellar tendon autograft and anteromedial portal femoral drilling, there was no difference in KOOS scores among patients fixed at 0o and 30o. Patient fixed in full extension did demonstrate higher activity scores at 2 years following surgery and a greater likelihood of achieving the MCID for KOOS pain

Abstract. Background. Performing lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) with ACL reconstruction may conflict with the ACLR femoral tunnel. Methods. 12 fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were used: at 120 flexion, an 8mm ACLR femoral tunnel was drilled in the anteromedial bundle position via the anteromedial portal. A modified Lemaire LET was performed using a 1 cm-wide iliotibial band strip left attached to Gerdy's tubercle. The LET femoral fixation point was identified 10mm proximal / 5 mm posterior to the LCL femoral attachment, and a 2.4-mm guide wire was drilled, aiming at 0, 10, 20, or 30 degrees anteriorly in the axial plane, and at 0, 10, or 20 degrees proximally in the coronal plane. The relationship between the LET drilling guide wire and the ACLR femoral tunnel reamer was recorded for each combination. When collision with the femoral tunnel was recorded, the LET wire depth was measured. Results. Tunnel conflict occurred at a mean LET wire depth of 23.6 mm (15–33 mm). No correlation existed between LET wire depth and LET drilling orientation (r=0.066; p=0.67). Drilling angle in the axial plane was significantly associated with the occurrence of tunnel conflict (P < .001). However, no such association was detected when comparing the drilling angle in the coronal plane (P=0.267). Conclusion. Conflict occurred at as little as 15 mm depth. When longer implants are used, the orientation should be at least 30 degrees anterior in the axial plane. Clinical Relevance. This study provides important information for surgeons performing LET in combination with ACLR

Introduction: Drilling of the femoral bone tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction may be performed in a transtibial drilling technique or via the anteromedial portal. Purpose: To determine the accuracy of the radiographic bone tunnel position using either a transtibial or anteromedial drilling technique. Materials & methods: The postoperative lateral radiographs of 100 patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction were reviewed. In each patient, the femoral bone tunnel was created either through the tibial tunnel or via the anteromedial standard arthroscopy portal. The resulting position of the femoral tunnel was evaluated according to reference values reported by Aglietti (65 % of the cortical femoral A-P distance along Blumenstaat’s line), Amis (60 % of the A-P diameter of the posterior lateral femoral condyle parallel to Blumensaat’s line), and Harner (80 % of the A-P length of Blumensaat’s line). The mean deviation of the radiographic tunnel position from the referenced values was statistically evaluated. Results: Radiographic bone tunnel positions with transtibial drilling were 62.42 ± 8.36, %, 54.53 ± 8.43 %, and 75.84 ± 9.56 % according to Aglietti, Amis, and Harner, respectively. Bone tunnel positions with anteromedial drilling were 65.46 ± 5.29 %, 59.59 ± 4.18 %, and 79.93 ± 4.24 %, respectively. The mean deviation from the reference values was significantly higher when comparing transtibial to anteromedial drilling. Transtibial drilling resulted in a significantly more anterior bone tunnel position. Conclusion: Precise bone tunnel placement is a prerequisite for proper postoperative knee function and stability. The results of this study indicate that the accuracy of femoral bone tunnel placement through the anteromedial arthroscopy portal was superior to transtibial drilling. It may therefrore be concluded that drilling the femoral tunnel through the anteromedial portal is recommended when using fixation techniques not depending upon placement of a transtibial guide

Aim: To evaluate whether a guiding pin for a femoral tunnel could be positioned through the tibial tunnel into the center of the anatomical ACL attachment. Methods: 77 knees underwented arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with hamstrings. The femoral tunnel was drilled through an anteromedial portal at the center of the anatomic insertion at about 10.00 resp.14.00 position. Tibial tunnel (mean diameter 7.55 ± 0.54 mm) was drilled using a guide inserted at 90 degrees of knee flexion. Then, through the tibial tunnel, a 4mm offset femoral drill guide was positioned as close as possible to the femoral tunnel and a 2.5 mm guide wire was drilled. The position of the guide wire was photographed arthroscopically and the deviation was measured as the distance between the center of the femoral tunnel and the guide wire. Results: The mean deviation was 4.50 ± 1.54 mm (p = 0.00000004) In 74 knees (96.1%) the guidewire did not reach the femoral tunnel. Only in 3 knees it reached the superomedial edge of the femoral tunnel. No statistical relationship was found between deviation and tibial tunnel inclination angles or tibial tunnel diameter. Conclusions: Transtibial femoral tunnel drilling does not reach the anatomic site of the ACL insertion, even with larger tibial tunnels (for hamstring grafts up to 8.5 mm). Transtibial tunnel drilling should be replaced by drilling through the anteromedial portal at least for tunnels with diameters < 9 mm

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are one of the most common ligament injury occurring in young and active individuals. Reconstruction of the torn ligament is the current standard of care. Of the many factors which determine the surgical outcome, fixation of the graft in the bony tunnels has significant role. This study compared the clinical and functional outcome in patients who underwent ACL reconstruction by standard anteromedial portal technique with single bundle hamstring graft anchored in the femoral tunnel using rigidfix and cortical button with adjustable loops. The tibial fixation and rehabilitation protocol were same in both groups. 107 patients underwent ACL reconstruction over a two-year period (87 males, 20 females, 44 after motor vehicle accident, 34 after sports injuries, 79 isolated ACL tear, 21 associated medial meniscus tear, 16 lateral meniscus tear and 11 both menisci). Rigid fix group had 47 patients and adjustable loop 60 patients. Clinical evaluation at end of one year showed better stability in rigid fix group regarding Lachman, anterior drawer, pivot shift tests, KT 1000 arthrometer side to side difference and hop limb symmetry index. However, the differences were not statistically significant. Functional evaluation using IKDC 2000 subjective score and Lysholm score showed better results in rigidfix group than variable loop, but was not statistically significant. However, lower scores were noted in patients with concomitant meniscal injury than in isolated acl tear patients and this was statistically significant in both groups. Rigidfix seems to give better graft fixation on femoral side than variable loop, but by the end of one year the functional outcome is comparable in isolated acl reconstructions

The purpose of the study was to compare prospectively and randomly two ACL reconstruction single bundle techniques, one referred to as traditional and the other referred to as anatomical, where the coronal angulation of the femoral tunnel aimed a more horizontal position at 2 and 10 o'clock. Orthopilot® System (Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany) was used to assist tunnel positioning in order to obtain and register translational and rotational stability. Eighteen patients (14 men and 4 women), average age 33.8 years (range 18 to 49), with isolated ACL lesion were randomized in two groups, A (Conventional) and B (Anatomical). All patients were submitted to ACL navigated arthroscopic reconstruction with quadruple hamstrings grafts. Anteromedial portal access for femoral tunnel drilling was used in all patients. The tibial and femoral tunnels drillings were monitored by the Aesculap® Orthopilot Navigation System. In Group A, the femoral tunnel positioning aimed isometricity. In Group B, femoral tunnel was drilled at 25% of Blumensaat's line length from the posterior cortex, and 30° orientation in coronal plane. Initial and final Maximum Anterior tibial Displacement (MATD), Internal Tibial Rotation (ITR) and External Tibial Rotation (ETR) at 30° knee flexion data were recorded intra operatively by the navigation system. No horizontal or rotational stability differences were found for MATD (p = 0.68), ITR (p = 014) and ETR (0.13). This study did not support the hypothesis that a more anatomical positioning leads to better rotational or anterior stability

Evaluation of transtibial aiming of the femoral tunnel at its anatomical position in arthroscopical ACL reconstruction. 43 ACL reconstructions with hamstrings’ graft were studied. First, the femoral tunnel was drilled through the anteromedial portal at 09.30–10.00 (14.00–14.30 resp.) and then the tibial tunnel (av. anteroposterior angle: 63,5°, sagittal: 64,2°) at the same diameter with simoultaneous radiological documentation. Then, with a femoral aiming device, we tried to put a K-wire at the center of the drilled femoral tunnel. Fotographic documentation took place. In 20 cases the diameter of the tunnels was 7mm, in 11, 7,5mm, in 7, 8mm, in 3, 8,5mm and in 1, 9mm. Evaluation of all radiological and photographic material from 2 observers followed, according to the deviation of the transtibial K-wire from the center of the femoral tunnel. 38 ACL reconstructions were evaluated. It was shown that in 11 cases the transtibial K-wire was in the femoral tunnel (28,9%) (in 7 with a diameter of 7mm., in 2 with 7,5mm. and in 2 with 8mm.). The K-wire was in 23 cases (60,5%) at the perimeter or out of the femoral tunnel (in 11, with a diameter of 7mm., in 8 with 7,5mm., in 4 with 8mm., in 3 with 8,5mm. and in 1 with 9mm.). There was no correlation with the angles of the tibial tunnel or the age of the patients. Transtibial aiming of the femoral tunnel at its anatomical position is very difficult and there is no correlation of the transtibial deviation with the diameter of the tibial tunnel

Purpose of Study: To prospectively evaluate the outcome of single surgeon endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with quadrupled hamstring tendons drilling femoral tunnel independent of the tibial tunnel. Methods and Results: 28 patients underwent endoscopic ACL reconstruction by a single surgeon in a DGH setting. All patients had symptomatic ACL deficiency proven by either MRI or previous arthroscopy. All patients were prospectively scored using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, the Lysholm score, Tegner activity score and the SF36 score. In each patient, an ipsilateral four-strand semi-tendinosus/gracilis tendon graft was used. The femoral tunnel was drilled through the anteromedial portal independent of the tibial tunnel as per the technique described by Leo Pinczewski, Sydney, Australia. This technique was used to place the femoral end of the graft in a more lateral position than obtained by the traditional transtibial technique. The ACL graft was fixed using RCI interference screws. All patients underwent standard accelerated rehabilitation program. All patients were reviewed clinically and radiologically at a mean follow-up 9 months. A significant improvement was noted in all the scores at the time of follow-up. Radiologically all femoral and tibial tunnels were satisfactorily placed with the femoral tunnels being in the 10 o’clock or 2 o’clock position with no evidence of tunnel widening. None of the grafts had failed. We feel that this technique may allow better rotational stability following ACL reconstruction

Bioabsorbable screws for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) have been shown to be associated with femoral tunnel widening and cyst formation. To compare a poly-L-lactide–hydroxyapatite screw (PLLA-HA) with a titanium screw with respect to clinical and radiological outcomes over a 5 year period. 40 patients were equally randomized into 2 groups (PLLA-HA vs titanium) and ACLR performed with a 4 strand hamstring graft with femoral tunnel drilling via the anteromedial portal. Evaluation at 2 and 5 years was performed using the International Knee Documentation Committee assessment (IKDC), Lysholm knee score, KT 1000 arthrometer, single-legged hop test. Magnetic resonance imaging was used to evaluate tunnel and screw volume, ossification around the screws, graft integration and cyst formation. There was no difference in any clinical outcome measure at 2 or 5 years between the 2 groups. At 2 years, the PLLA-HA femoral tunnel was significantly smaller than the titanium screw tunnel (p=0.015) and at 5 years, there was no difference. At 2 years the femoral PLLA-HA screw was a mean 76% of its original volume and by 5 years, 36%. At 2 years the tibial PLLA-HA screw mean volume was 68% of its original volume and by 5 years, 46%. At 5 years, 88% of femoral tunnels and 56% of tibial tunnels demonstrated a significant ossification response. There was no increase in cyst formation in the PLLA-HA group and no screw breakages. The PLLA-HA screw provides adequate aperture fixation in ACLR with excellent functional outcomes. It was not associated with femoral tunnel widening or increased cyst formation when compared with the titanium screw. The resorbtion characteristics appear favourable and the hydroxyapatite component of the screw may stimulate osteoconduction, contributing to these results. The PLLA-HA screw is a good alternative to a titanium screw in ACLR, which may aid revision procedures and allow for imaging without artifact

The purpose of this study is to identify the optimal amount of knee flexion required to drill the femoral tunnel in ACL reconstruction using the transtibial technique in order to ensure the correct alignment between the femoral tunnel and the interference screw. Methods: Twenty (10 × 2) fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were used. The native ACL was resected and its tibial attachment was identified. The angle of the tibial tunnel was set at 55° using an Arthrex tibial guide. The extra-articular tibial tunnel entry point was located at the anterior border of the superficial MCL. The intra-articular exit point of the guide wire was digitized with a digital camera and referenced to anatomical landmarks (the anterior border of the PCL, the lateral aspect of the medial spine and the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus). The femoral tunnels were made using the transtibial technique and a 5mm femoral guide to insert guidewires at 70, 80, and 90 degrees of knee flexion (groups a, b, c respectively). The angles of divergence between the longitudinal axis of the femoral tunnel and the interference screw (placed through an anteromedial portal at 120° of knee flexion) were then measured. Results: The degrees of divergence were: 5° ± 2° for group a, 12° ± 4 for group b, and 15° ± 3° for group c. Conclusions: Optimal femoral tunnel and interference screw alignment is achieved using the transtibial technique when the femoral tunnel is drilled with the knee in 70 degrees of flexion and the screw is inserted at 120 degrees of knee flexion. This study identifies a mathematical formula for the optimal amount of knee flexion required to drill the femoral tunnel in ACL reconstruction using the transtibial technique in order to ensure the correct alignement between the femoral tunnel and the interference screw

Purpose: To describe the current practices and opinions of members of the Canadian Orthopaedic Association (COA) pertaining to anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Method: All orthopaedic surgeon members of the COA residing in Canada were sent an email invitation to take part in a survey via an internet-based survey manager. Expanding on a previously published survey (Marx et al., 2003), the current survey was comprised of 30 questions regarding the natural history of ACL-injured knees, surgical and post-surgical treatment choices, and success of the surgery. Clinical agreement was defined as greater than 80% agreement in choice of response option. Results: Two hundred and eighty-three surgeons (49.3%) responded to the survey. Responses of the 143 surgeons (50.5%) who indicated they performed ACL reconstruction in the last year are presented. Clinical agreement with respect to surgical technique was demonstrated with respect to only three practices – ipsilateral graft harvest (100%), single incision approach (86.1%), and manual graft tensioning (81.6%). In terms of natural history, the only area of agreement was that hamstring and quadriceps strength affects function in ACL deficient knees (92%). Although less than the clinical agreement threshold, a majority of surgeons indicated their preference for semitendinosis-gracilis autograft (73%), transtibial versus anteromedial portal for establishment of the femoral tunnel (65 versus 29%), notch-plasty (65% only with impingement) and promotion of full weight-bearing and range of motion immediately post-surgery (72.1 and 74.8%, respectively). The most frequent surgeon-reported complications were tunnel widening (9.8%) and graft failure (4.4%). A greater proportion of high-volume surgeons used a manual tensioning device intra-operatively and permitted earlier return to sport (p< 0.05). Conclusion: In the rapidly evolving area of ACL reconstruction, no recent survey of practices and opinions of orthopaedic surgeons has been published. The current survey is more extensive than others conducted to date and attempts to involve all practicing orthopaedic surgeons in Canada. In addition to providing information from a Canadian perspective, such an undertaking allows surgeons to evaluate their treatment decisions based on those of their colleagues, and also presents areas of dissimilarity that can be targeted for more extensive research

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a guiding pin for a femoral tunnel could be positioned through the tibial tunnel into the center of the anatomical ACL attachment. Material and Methods: We studied 77 knees who underwented arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with hamstrings. The femoral tunnel was drilled through an antero-medial portal at the center of the anatomic insertion at about 10 resp. 2 o’clock position. Tibial tunnel (mean diameter 7.55 ± 0.54 mm ) was drilled at 90° of knee flexion. The aiming point was on a line, being a “prolongation” of the posterior border of the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus and at exactly 60% of the distance from the end of the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus and the medial tibial spine. Then, through the tibial tunnel, a 4mm offset femoral drill guide was positioned as close as possible to the femoral tunnel and a 2.5 mm guide wire was drilled. The position of the guide wire was photographed arthroscopically and the deviation was measured as distance between the center of the femoral tunnel and guide wire. Results: The mean angle of the tibial tunnel in the coronar plain was 27,53° and in the sagittal plain 25,84°, both according to the longitudinal axis of the tibia. In 74 knees ( 96. 1 % ) the guidewire did not reach the femoral tunnel. Only in 3 knees it reached the superomedial edge of the femoral tunnel. The mean deviation was 4.50 ± 1.54 mm (p = 0.00000004 ). No statistical relationship was found between deviation and tibial tunnel inclination angles or tibial tunnel diameter. Conclusion: Transtibial femoral tunnel drilling did not reach the anatomic side of the ACL insertion in most of the cases, even with larger tibial tunnels (for hamstring grafts up to 8.5 mm). Therefore we recommend tibial tunnel drilling through the anteromedial portal

Background. Recent publications have supported the anatomic placement of anterior cruciate grafts to optimise knee function. However, anatomic placement using the anteromedial portal has been shown to have a higher failure rate than traditional graft placement using the transtibial method. This is possibly due to it being more technically difficult and to the short femoral tunnel compromising fixation methods. It also requires the knee to be in hyper flexion. This position is not feasible during with a tourniquet in situ on the heavily muscled thighs of some athletes. Hypothesis: That navigation can be used to place the femoral tunnel in the anatomic position via a more medial transtibial tunnel. Methods. 25 patients underwent Navigated Anterior Cruciate reconstruction with quadruple hamstring grafts. The Orthopilot™ 3.0 ACL (BBraun Aesculap, Tuttlingen) software was used. The femoral and tibial ACL footprints were marked on the bones with a radio frequency probe and registered. The pivot shift test, anterior drawer and internal and external rotation were registered. A navigated tibial guide wire was inserted at 25° to the sagittal plane and 45° to the transverse plane exiting through the centre of the tibial footprint. The guide wire was advanced into the joint to just clear of the surface of the femoral footprint with the knee in 90° flexion. Flexion/extension of the knee was done to determine the closest position of the guide wire tip to the centre of the anatomical femoral footprint. If the tip was within 2mm of the centre of footprint, the position was accepted. If not the tibial guide wire was repositioned and the process repeated. The tibial tunnel was drilled, followed by transtibial drilling of the femoral tunnel. A screen shot was done to allow determination of the shape and area of the tunnel aperture relative to the femoral footprint using ImageJ (National Institute of Health). The graft was fixed proximally with an Arthrex ACL Tightrope® and distally with a Genesys™ interference screw. The pivot shift test, anterior drawer and internal and external rotation were repeated and recorded using the software. Results. In 22 out of 25 patients the centre of the drill hole was within 2mm of the centre of the anatomic femoral footprint. In 3 patients it was between 2 and 4 mm off centre. The femoral tunnel diameter ranged from 7.5mm to 9.5mm. In 23 knees there was more than 80 % overlap between the tunnel aperture and the anatomical footprint. In the other 2 knees there was 65% and 75% overlap respectively. The direction of the final tibial tunnel ranged from 22° to 28° from the sagittal plane and 42° to 49° from the transverse plane. The optimum knee flexion was between 76° and 94°. In all cases, the pivot shift recorded by the software was absent after graft fixation. There was a statistically significant difference between the anterior drawer, internal and external rotation before and after graft fixation (p<0.05). Conclusion. Based on our data, navigation allows reproducible transtibial anatomic placement of the quadruple hamstring ACL graft. This is possible when the position of the tibial tunnel is customised to the anatomy of the individual patient's knee

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of hylan G-F 20 viscosupplementation in patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of the ankle. Methods: Prospective, multi-center, open study in patients with primary or secondary grade II talocrural OA confirmed by X-ray. At baseline, patients had to score between 50–90 mm on the Patient-completed Ankle OA Pain VAS (0–100 mm). Patients received one intra-articular injection of 2 ml of hylan G-F 20 and were given an option of a second and final 2 ml injection if their pain remained between 50-90 mm on the VAS after 1, 2 or 3 months. Intraarticular injections were placed in the anteromedial portal of the ankle joint as described for ankle arthroscopy. Patients were followed for 6 months after the final injection. As rescue medication, patients could only take paracetamol up to 4 g per day, except on the day of or the day before a study visit. All treatment emergent adverse events (AEs) were recorded. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline (at final injection) in the Ankle OA Pain VAS at 3 months after the final injection. Secondary endpoints were Ankle OA Pain VAS scores at all other time-points, total Ankle OA Scale, Patient and Physician Global OA Assessment (VAS), and health-related quality of life (SF-36). Results: Fifty-five patients (33 M; 22 F) were enrolled and received a first injection of hylan G-F 20. Twenty-four patients (44%) received a second injection. The mean age was 41 years (range 19–70). Overall, treatment with hylan G-F 20 was well tolerated. Seventeen patients (31%) had a treatment related AE of the target ankle. All were of mild or moderate intensity, the majority consisting of arthralgia and injection site pain. There was a statistically significant decrease in Ankle OA Pain VAS score from 68.0 mm at Baseline to 33.8 mm at Month 3 (p< 0.001, paired t-test), which was maintained at 6 months follow-up. The decrease was statistically significant at all time points. Patients who received only 1 injection demonstrated a greater decrease at 3 months (−42.5 mm) than patients with 2 injections (−23.5 mm). The secondary efficacy endpoints showed similar results. Of the total study population, 29 patients (53%) were responders (i.e. at least a 50% decrease in ankle OA pain) after 3 months. 64% of patients receiving 1 injection were responders after 3 months. The SF-36 questionnaire showed statistically significant improvements for both the physical and mental component scores at 3 and 6 months follow-up. Conclusions: Treatment of OA of the ankle with intraarticular hylan G-F 20 injections is well tolerated. Treatment with hylan G-F 20 significantly decreases pain which is maintained for up to 6 months

Aims

The aim of this study was to compare the preinjury functional scores with the postinjury preoperative score and postoperative outcome scores following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery (ACLR).

The saphenous nerve is classically described as innervating skin of the medial foot extending to the first MTP joint and thus is at risk in surgery to the medial ankle and forefoot. However, it has previously been demonstrated by the senior author that the dorsomedial branch of the superficial peroneal nerve consistently supplies the dorsomedial forefoot, leading to debate as to whether the saphenous nerve should routinely be included in ankle blocks for forefoot surgery. We undertook a cadaveric study to assess the presence and variability of the saphenous nerve. 29 feet were dissected from a level 10 cm above the medial malleolus, and distally to the termination of the saphenous nerve. In 24 specimens (83%), a saphenous nerve was present at the ankle joint. In 5 specimens the nerve terminated at the level of the ankle joint, and in 19 specimens the nerve extended to supply the skin distal to the ankle. At the ankle, the mean distance of the nerve from the tibialis anterior tendon and saphenous vein was 14mm and 3mm respectively. The mean distance reached in the foot was 5.1cm. 28% of specimens had a saphenous nerve that reached the first metatarsal and no specimens had a nerve that reached the great toe. The current study shows that the course of the saphenous nerve is highly variable, and when present usually terminates within 5cm of the ankle. The saphenous nerve is at risk in anteromedial arthroscopy portal placement, and should be included in local anaesthetic ankle blocks in forefoot surgery, as a significant proportion of nerves supply the medial forefoot