Ankle arthrodesis and replacement are the widely accepted options in managing end-stage ankle arthritis. Ankle replacement as an alternate treatment option for ankle arthritis is relatively new and this is in large part to the successes observed with hip and knee arthroplasty for arthritis. Relative benefits of ankle replacement and arthrodesis remains a contentious topic. We conducted a multicenter pilot randomized controlled trial, first of its kind, comparing the clinical outcomes of ankle arthrodesis and ankle replacement in managing ankle arthritis. We hypothesized that clinical outcomes would be similar for both. Patients recruited for this study were part of Canadian Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (COFAS) Database. Canadian orthopaedic surgeons with fellowship training in foot and ankle surgery or extensive experience in the surgical treatment of end stage ankle arthritis determined whether the patient met the criteria for randomization, skeletal maturity, symptomatic ankle arthritis no longer amenable to non-operative management, and ability to give informed consent. Data was collected on patient demographics, follow-up time period, complication rates, and Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS) and Short Form-36 (SF-36) scores. Our analysis of clinical outcomes was divided into two parts: (1) comparison of pre and postoperative data for each cohort separately, and (2) comparison of outcome scores, and revision rates between both cohorts. We employed the Student's t-test and calculated effect sizes in assessing improvements in AOS and SF-36 scores from baseline to latest follow-up within and between the two groups. We also examined postoperative complication and reoperation rates in the study population using the standardized coding system for reoperations following ankle replacement and arthrodesis. Thirty-nine ankles were enrolled in the study with a mean follow-up of 5.1 ± 2.8 years. Ankle osteoarthritis scale scores improved significantly from baseline and last follow-up in both groups. The average baseline AOS total score for ankle replacement improved from 59.4 ±15.9 to 38 ±20 at last follow-up (p-value 19.7 to 31.8 ±16.5 at last follow-up (p-value 25.4 compared to ankle replacement's 20.3 ±23. Two major complications (10.5%) were observed in the ankle replacement cohort while the ankle arthrodesis cohort saw four major complications (20%). Clinical outcomes of ankle replacement and arthrodesis were comparable. The ankle arthrodesis cohort held a slight advantage over ankle replacement in improvement of AOS scores, though not statistically significant. Rates of major complications and reoperations were higher with ankle arthrodesis

Preoperative talar valgus deformity increases the technical difficulty of total ankle replacement (TAR) and is associated with an increased failure rate. Deformity of ≥15° has been reported to be a contraindication to arthroplasty. The goal of the present study was to determine whether the operative procedures and clinical outcomes of TAR for treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis were comparable for patients with preoperative talar valgus deformity of ≥15° as compared to those with <15°. We will describe the evolving surgical technique being utilized to tackle these challenging cases. Fifty ankles with preoperative coronal-plane tibiotalar valgus deformity of ≥15° “valgus” group) and 50 ankles with valgus deformity of <15° (“control” group) underwent TAR. The cohorts were similar with respect to demographics and components used. All TARs were performed by a single surgeon. The mean duration of clinical follow-up was 5.5 years (minimum two years). Preoperative and postoperative radiographic measurements of coronal-plane deformity, Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS) scores and Short Form (SF)-36 scores were prospectively recorded. All ancillary (intraoperative) and secondary procedures, complications and measurements were collected. The AOS pain and disability subscale scores decreased significantly in both groups. The improvement in AOS and SF-36 scores did not differ significantly between the groups at the time of the final follow-up. The valgus group underwent more ancillary procedures during the index surgery (80% vs 26%). Tibio-talar deformity improved significantly toward a normal weight-bearing axis in the valgus group. Secondary postoperative procedures were more common in the valgus group (36%) than the controls (20%). Overall, re-operation was not associated with poorer patient outcome scores. Metal component revision surgery occurred in seven patients (three valgus and four controls). These revisions included two deep infections (2%), one in each group, which were converted to hindfoot fusions. Therefore, 94% of the valgus group retained their original components at final follow-up. Thus far, this is the largest reported study that specifically evaluates TAR with significant preoperative valgus alignment, in addition to having the longest follow-up. Satisfactory midterm results were achieved in patients with valgus mal-alignment of ≥15°. The valgus cohort required more procedures during and after their TAR, as well as receiving more novel techniques to balance their TAR. Whilst longer term studies are needed, valgus coronal-plane alignment of ≥15° should not be considered an absolute contraindication to TAR if the associated deformities are addressed

Purpose: Giant cell tumour (GCT) of the distal radius is associated with high local recurrence rates unless the tumour is aggressively resected, which often leaves a significant skeletal defect. The purpose of this study is to compare the functional outcomes of two commonly used reconstructive techniques, vascularised free fibular transfer (VFF) and non-vascularised structural iliac crest transfer (NIC). Method: Patients treated for giant cell tumour of the distal radius in either Vancouver or at Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto were identified in the prospectively collected databases maintained in each centre. Twenty-seven patients were identified, 14 of whom underwent VFF transfer as their primary procedure. The two groups were comparable for age, sex and tumour grade. Functional outcomes were assessed with TESS, MSTS, DASH and the Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale. Results: Fourteen patients were included in the VFF group, 13 of which were performed as the primary index procedure, one followed prior cementation. Thirteen patients underwent NIC, one followed prior cementation. Two local recurrences occurred in the VFF group and one in NIC group, all treated with local excision. In the VFF group three patients underwent further surgery for cosmesis, hardware removal and tendon release respectively. One is scheduled for future surgery for tendon release. In the NIC group two patients suffered infections requiring debridement, one of which ultimately went on to require free fibular transfer. This patient’s results were included in the NIC group as this was the index procedure. Functional scores showed no differences between the two groups on any of the parameters studied for the upper limb (Mann-Whitney test). The Ankle osteoarthritis scale had a median score of 9% for the six patients on which it was available. Conclusion: Both VFF and NIC are effective surgical techniques that result in a well-functioning wrist arthrodesis. VFF may be more useful where there is a significant skin defect from previous interventions. We were unable to demonstrate any difference in functional scores between VFF and NIC

A significant portion of ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis procedures performed in British Columbia are funded by the public medical services plan (MSP). However, some patients are treated privately through self-pay or by the workers compensation board (WCB), with the latter two groups being more likely to receive treatment sooner. The potential effect of payer on patient-reported outcomes and reoperation rates has not been previously explored. A retrospective chart review was performed using data from the Canadian Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Prospective Ankle Reconstruction Database. N=443 patients (393 MSP, 26 self-pay, 24 WCB), treated with total ankle replacement or ankle arthrodesis by three subspecialty-trained surgeons in Vancouver from 1999–2003, were analyzed. Outcomes were compared, by payer, preoperatively and at long-term follow-up (6.3 years, range 2–14 years). Function was assessed using the Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS) Total score (primary outcome) and the AOS Pain and Difficulty subscores. Expectation and satisfaction with symptoms was assessed using the Musculoskeletal Outcomes Data Evaluation and Management Scale, and physical and emotional quality of life was assessed using the Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey in terms of the mental component summary (MCS) and physical component summary (PCS). Swelling and reoperation rates were also compared. AOS Total score was not significantly different between payers. WCB patients had significantly worse preoperative AOS Difficulty scores (73, 95%CI 65–80) compared to MSP (65, CI 63–67) and self-pay patients (56, CI 49–63)(p < 0 .008). Their SF-36 MCS scores were also significantly worse pre- and postoperatively (WCB: 43, CI 38–49, 45, CI 40–50, MSP: 51, CI 50–52, 51, CI 50–52, self-pay: 51, CI 46–56, 54, CI 49–58)(p < 0 .03). AOS Pain scores and SF-36 PCS scores were not different. Pre- and postoperatively, MSP patients reported more satisfaction with symptoms (1.31, CI 1.24–1.38, 3.21, CI 3.07–3.35), compared to WCB (1.13, CI 0.84–1.41, 2.83, CI 2.26–3.41) and self-pay patients (1.19, CI 0.91–1.47, 2.88, CI 2.33–3.44). Preoperatively, WCB patients had the lowest expectations (76, CI 69–84), the worst AOS Total (64, CI 57–71) and SF-36 scores (MCS 43, CI 38–49, PCS 28, CI, 25–32), and the most swelling (3.5, CI 3.1–4). Conversely, self-pay patients had the highest preoperative expectations (88, CI 81–95), the best AOS Total (53, CI 46–60) and SF-36 scores (MCS 51, CI 46–56, PCS: 34, CI 30–37) and the least swelling (3, CI 2.6–3.4). Postoperatively, WCB and self-pay patients had lower expectations met (35, CI 23–47 and 40, CI 28–51) and worse AOS Total scores (36, CI 27–45 and 35, 26–43), compared to MSP patients (Expectations: 29, CI 26–32, AOS Total: 31, CI 29–33). Reoperation rates were similar among groups. WCB patients had significantly more difficulty with symptoms prior to surgery and worse SF-36 MCS scores pre- and postoperatively. The preoperative expectations of WCB patients were lowest, while those of self-pay patients were highest. Both groups had lower expectations met postoperatively

Background. Ankle arthrodesis results in significantly improved pain and function for patients with end-stage ankle arthritis. Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis has gained increasing popularity with reports of shorter hospital stays, time to union and equivalent union rates to open arthrodesis. However, there remains a lack of good quality prospective data. Methods. We report a prospective comparative clinical study comparing open and arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis at two institutions with two-year follow-up. The primary outcome was the Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale and secondary outcomes included the SF-36, hospital stay and radiographic alignment. A power calculation was performed. There were 30 patients in each group. Results. Both groups showed a significant improvement in AOS and physical component score (PCS) of the SF-36 at one and two years. There was a significantly greater improvement in AOS scores at one year and two years and shorter hospital stay in the arthroscopic group. There was no significant difference in complications, surgical time or radiographic alignment. Conclusions. Open and Arthroscopic Ankle arthrodesis demonstrate a significant improvement in pain and function as measured by the AOS. Arthroscopic arthrodesis showed improved outcomes at one and two years and a shorter hospital stay

Researchers and clinicians measuring outcomes following total ankle replacement (TAR) are challenged by the wide range of outcome measures used in the literature without consensus as to which are valid, reliable, and responsive in this population. This review identifies region- or joint-specific outcome measures used for evaluating TAR outcomes and synthesises evidence for their measurement properties. A standard search strategy was conducted of electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL (to June 2015) to identify foot/ankle measures in use. A best evidence synthesis approach was taken to critically appraise measurement properties [COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN)] of identified measures. The review was restricted to English publications and excluded cross-cultural adaptations. Measurement properties collected from each article were coded for validity, reliability, responsiveness, or interpretability. Clinimetric evidence exists for identified measures tested in non-TAR populations, but were not the focus of this review. The search identified 14 studies to include in the best evidence synthesis with 32 articles providing clinimetric evidence for eight of the measures (one CBO, seven PRO), however only five measures were tested in a TAR population (Foot Function Index, Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale [AOFAS], Foot and Ankle Outcome Score, Self-Reported Foot and Ankle Score). Five studies provided clinimetric evidence in a TAR population and their methodological quality was assessed: (1) Validity—two good quality studies examining different measures provide moderate evidence supporting construct validity (FFI, AOS, AOFAS self-reported items; SEFAS); (2) Reliability—two good quality studies examining different measures provide moderate evidence supporting internal consistency and test-retest reliability (FFI, AOS, AOFAS self-reported items; FAOS, SEFAS); (3) Responsiveness—three poor quality studies, thus unknown evidence for responsiveness; (4) Interpretability—two studies provide interpretability values (AOS, FFI, AOFAS self-reported items; AOS). This review offers a basis for choosing the most appropriate instrument for evaluating TAR outcomes. Numerous outcome measures were identified with evidence supporting their use in populations with various foot/ankle conditions, but none have strong evidence supporting use in a TAR population. Measures must have adequate clinimetric properties in all patient groups in which they are applied. Evidence supporting or critiquing an instrument should not be based on studies with poor quality methodology, as identified by this review. Further testing in a TAR population would benefit identified measures with emphasis on adequate sample sizes, testing a priori hypotheses, and evaluating their content validity for a TAR population

Purpose. Weight loss is often advised to our patients and considered to make a substantial difference in most musculoskeletal symptoms. Patients with end stage ankle arthrosis have severe pain, diminished health related quality of life, and limited physical function. They frequently refer to increased weight as a simple indicator of decline in their quality loose weight. Patients assume that weight loss will follow after surgery secondary to increased activity with reduced pain and disability. Method. Changes in the body mass index, mental and physical component of SF36 and Ankle Scale Osteoarthritis of 145 overweight and obese patients after ankle surgery were assessed up to five year after surgery with a mean of 37.1 month follow up from 2002 to 2009. Results. The Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale and Physical component of SF36 significantly improved, by a mean of 34.8, 9.8, respectively after ankle surgery but there was not significant change in Body mass index. Conclusion. Pain and disability of end stage ankle arthritis usually resolve gradually within one and two year after surgery but body mass index changes was insignificant in five year period. In fact following successful ankle fusion or replacement, 1/3 of our patients gained 1 unit BMI or more, 1/3 lost one unit BMI or more and 1/3 remained within one unit of their pre op BMI. This suggests that obesity is a multifactorial and an independent disease

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcome of patients treated surgically for end stage ankle arthritis using a total ankle arthroplasty or ankle arthrodesis. This is a multicentered prospective clinical outcome study of the surgical treatment of patients with EAA using an ankle arthrodesis (n= 117) or total ankle arthroplasty (n= 210). Clinical outcome was assessed using health related quality of life (SF36v2) and joint specific (Foot Function Index, Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale, American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Hindfoot Scale and the AAOS Foot and Ankle Baseline Questionnaire(version 2000)) outcome scores. Preoperatively, all patients had significant physical and psychological morbidity. All symptom and functional SF36 subscales were approximately two standard deviations below normal population scores. Approximately 25% of patients were three standard deviations below population values, indicating increased risk of mortality. There was no evidence that age or gender influenced the level of disability. There was a significant improvement in the health related quality of life and the joint specific clinical outcome scores at six and twelve months follow up but no consistent difference was noted between the two cohorts. This is the first multicentered prospective clinical outcome study that demonstrates equal efficacy for early follow up of patients treated for EAA with total ankle arthroplasty or ankle arthrodesis

The purpose of this study is to assess the clinical outcome and gait analysis of a new technique for ankle arthrodesis using a Fibular Sparing Z Osteotomy (FSZO). The FSZO technique for ankle arthrodesis utilises a lateral approach where the fibula is osteotomised and reflected posteriorly on a soft tissue hinge to allow easy access to the ankle joint for an anatomic arthrodesis. Outcome assessment at six months follow up included health related quality of life (SF36) and joint specific (American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot, Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale, Foot Function Index) clinical outcome scores. Gait Analysis was completed using the Walkabout Portable Gait Monitor® which includes a wireless gait belt housing a triaxial arrangement of accelerometers, resting behind the lumbar vertebrae, approximately at position of centre of mass to quatintfy surgery, lurch and functional limb length difference (LLD). There was a significant improvement in the health related quality of life and the joint specific clinical outcome scores at six months follow up. The six month gait study preliminary analysis showed improvement in some parameters of gait but worsening in others. The FSZO ankle arthrodesis technique provides improvement in clinical outcome scores and certain gait parameters at early follow up

Aim. The purpose of this clinical series is to prospectively review the mid-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of the Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement (STAR) performed at two academic Canadian University centres. Methods. Between 1998 and 2005, 111 STAR were implanted into 98 patients at two Canadian centres. Prospective clinical and radiographic follow-up was performed. Validated and non-validated outcome questionnaires consisting of the AAOS foot and ankle questionnaire, AOFAS Hindfoot score, Foot Function Index (FFI), Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS) were completed. Sixty four patients were followed with these scores prospectively and 50 retrospectively. Both groups had prospective radiographic follow-up using measures described by Hintermann et al, and Wood et al. Results. The average follow-up for both groups was 6.3 years (4.6-8.5 years). Of the 111 implanted STARs, 12 (11%) STARs had a metal component revision performed giving an overall survival of 89% (99) of the originally implanted metal components at the conclusion of the study. Thirty five patients (32%) had a re-operation performed during the follow-up period, 15 procedures (14%) were for replacement of fractured polyethylene liners. The sustained benefit across questionnaires from the STAR persisted to final follow up. Some evidence of osteolysis was present in 110/111 (99%) ankles at the final follow-up, more commonly around the talar component. No significant differences between the two centres in pre-operative or intra-operative data were identified. Conclusion. The STAR, in the mid-term, shows acceptable survival and revision rates. There are, however, some concerning findings on radiographic follow-up. Further investigation and longer follow-up is required to substantiate these concerns

End-stage ankle arthritis (ESAA) is a debilitating disease that does not affect all individuals equally. Gender differences have been identified in patients with end-stage hip and knee arthritis and have stimulated research to explain these findings. The present study was undertaken to examine if gender has a significant effect on pre-operative disability and post-operative outcomes in patients with ESAA. Patients undergoing ankle arthrodesis (AA) or total ankle replacement (TAR) with minimum 2-year follow-up were identified in the Canadian Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society prospective ankle reconstruction database. Demographic data, revision data, patient satisfaction questionnaires, and outcome data using the Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS) and Short-form 36 (SF-36) health survey were collected. TAR: 384 patients were included, with 198 females and 186 males. Patient BMI, comorbidities, and duration of follow-up were similar between groups. Males were slightly older at the time of surgery (65.1 vs 62.4 years, p=0.01)). The most common etiology was post-traumatic arthritis for both genders, however females had a higher rate of rheumatoid arthritis (17% vs 5%, p=0.001). Implant types included STAR, Hintegra, and Mobility, and were similar between groups. Preoperatively females had higher rates of pain and disability, demonstrated by lower SF-36 physical component scores (PCS) (31.0 vs 34.5, p<0.001), and higher AOS pain (54.7 vs 51.1, p=0.05) and AOS disability scores (66.5 vs 59.6, p<0.001). Postoperatively, both groups had significant improvement in PCS, AOS pain, and AOS disability scores. Females, however, continued to demonstrate lower PCS scores (38.3 vs 41.9, p<0.001) and higher AOS disability (31.0 vs 25.8, p=0.02) than males. Regression analysis found that preoperative PCS, gender, age, and arthritis etiology all had a significant impact on postoperative PCS scores, with preoperative PCS scores having the largest impact. Preoperative AOS pain and disability scores had the largest impact on postoperative AOS pain and disability scores, respectively. Gender had no significant impact on AOS pain and disability scores postoperatively. Patient satisfaction was similar between males and females postoperatively. Secondary surgery was performed in 13.6% of females and 16.1% of males. Five males and five females underwent revision to arthrodesis. In patients with ESAA, females tend to have higher pre-operative levels of pain and disability compared to males, which persists post-operatively. This is consistent with the hip and knee arthroplasty literature. This finding may be due to females undergoing surgery at more advanced disease states, arthritis etiology, referral bias, or treatment bias. Both males and females have significant and similar degrees of improvement in pain and disability scores after TAR, and reoperation rates and patient satisfaction rates are similar despite the apparent disparity in outcomes

Objectives. A defect following resection of Giant Cell Tumour of the distal radius (GCT-DR) is reconstructed by either vascularised free fibular transfer (VFF) or non-vascularised structural iliac crest transfer (NIC). The purpose of this study was to compare these procedures. Methods. Twenty-seven patients at two centres were identified, 14 underwent VFF and 13 NIC. The two groups were comparable for age, sex, and tumour grade. Functional outcomes were assessed with TESS, MSTS, and DASH. In the VFF group, ankle joint morbidity was assessed with the Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale. In the NIC group, iliac crest morbidity was assessed with a short questionnaire. Results. Two local recurrences occurred in the VFF group and one in the NIC group. Following the index surgery, three patients in the VFF group underwent surgery for cosmesis, hardware removal or tendon release, and one is scheduled for tendon release. In the NIC group two infections required debridement, one of which went on to free fibular transfer, but there were no re-operations for union or donor site morbidity. The surgical time was significantly shorter for NIC. Functional scores showed no differences between the groups on any of the parameters studied for the upper limb (Mann-Whitney test). The Anke OA scale and the iliac crest morbidity questionnaire revealed only a few mild problems with donor site morbidity in either group. Conclusion. Both VFF and NIC are effective surgical techniques that result in a well-functioning wrist arthrodesis. VFF should be considered when there is a significant skin defect, as it allows the inclusion of a vascularised skin paddle, or when the osseous defect is too long for NIC. We were unable to demonstrate any difference in functional scores between VFF and NIC. As the re-operation rate is less for NIC and surgical time is shorter, we recommend NIC whenever possible

Summary: The SF-36, FFI, AOS and the AOFAS AHS were recorded pre and post-operatively in patients with end-stage ankle arthritis. Comparison of responsiveness shows the AOFAS score to be completely unresponsive. Introduction: Outcome studies should include both general health and disease specific measures. The Short Form 36 (SF36) is validated and widely used in musculoskeletal disease. A number of disease specific scores are available for the foot and ankle but, at present there is no widely agreed and validated score used specifically in end-stage ankle arthritis (EAA). Methods: 555 sets of pre and post-operative data on 239 EAA patients undergoing definitive treatment have been collected. The SF36 and three widely used Foot and Ankle scores (Foot Function Index (FFI), AOFAS Ankle Hindfoot Score (AHS) and Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS)) were recorded. We assessed the responsiveness (Standardized Response Mean (SRM) and Effect Size (ES)) and correlation (Spearman Rank Correlation) of each of the above scores. Results: The SF36, FFI and AOS responded to change and correlated in sub-scale and total scores. The AHS did not respond to change in pain or total scores and did not correlate with any other score. Using the three responsive scores there was a significant improvement in outcome with operative intervention (p< 0.0001) with each score. Using the SRM and the ES, the AOS showed the highest level of responsiveness. It also showed an increased response rate suggesting that patients find it more useable. Conclusion: In future studies we would recommend the use of the SF36 and the AOS for assessment of patients with EAA. We would also discourage use of the AOFAS Ankle Hindfoot Score which we have demonstrated to be unresponsive to change

Purpose: 1/ To compare patients treated with both ankle arthroplasty or ankle fusion using validated functional outcome measures and a computerized motion analysis system that measures three-dimensional kinematics and temporal data. 2/ To compare the functional outcome and gait mechanics of ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis to a healthy control group. Methods: Fifteen patients underwent seventeen ankle arthroplasties with the Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement (STAR), twenty-three patients underwent ankle arthrodesis, and twenty-three healthy control patients were enrolled in this study. Assessment included: 1/ Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS) and general health status (SF-36). 2/ Gait data, including temporal-spatial, kinematic, and kinetic parameters using a seven-camera VICON 370 system (Oxford Metrics, UK). Comparison between groups was done using one-way ANOVA post hoc Bonferroni (p< 0.05). Results: Kinematic gait parameters for post-op arthrodesis, post-op arthroplasty and a control group are summarized in Table 1. Postoperative arthrodesis patients had significantly reduced ankle range of motion in the sagittal and frontal plane when compared to both postoperative arthroplasty patients and a control group (p< 0.05). Forefoot range of motion was also significantly reduced in the sagittal and frontal planes for arthrodesis patients when compared to the control group, however there were no significant differences between patient groups or between arthroplasty patients and controls (p< 0.05).|Functional questionnaire (AOS) data for the three groups is summarized in Table 2. There were no significant differences in patient perception of pain and disability, however AOS scores compared between arthrodesis patients and a control group were significant (p< 0.05). No difference was noted in AOS scores between ankle arthroplasty and control patients at one year post operative. Conclusions: Functional outcome analysis of treatment methods of end-stage ankle arthritis clearly shows the advantage of ankle arthroplasty over arthrodesis when comparing kinematic and outcome questionnaire data against controls. The results of this study will help determine the best surgical treatment for patients with end-stage ankle arthritis failing non-operative treatment

Purpose: Ankle fusion provides relief of symptoms for end stage ankle arthritis, but arthritis in surrounding joints as well as loss of motion limit the outcomes of this procedure. Total ankle arthroplasty may avoid these issues. The purpose of this study is to, with several clinical outcome scores, determine the outcomes achieved by those patients who received agility TAA from 2 senior surgeons at a Canadian institution. Method: Between March 2003 and November 2005 thirty-three agility total ankle replacements were placed in thirty-two patients by two senior foot and ankle fellowship trained surgeons at the BC foot and ankle center. Each patient pre-operatively filled out the American academy of orthopaedic surgery function score (AAOS), ankle osteoarthritis scale (AOS), foot function index (FFI), ankle-hindfoot (AHS). The patient was then prospectively followed-up with the same questionnaires at 6 months, 1 year and again at 2 years. Results: Post-operatively significant reduction in pain were found in all 5 surveys. AHS found significant improvements in level of pain (p< 0.001 in 7 domains and p = 0.01, and p = 0.02 in the 2 additional domain. With respect to post-operrative mobility. The AHS showed significant increases in flexion and extension (p = 0.02) of the affected ankle. This score also showed significant post-operative improvements in subjective sense of ankle stability (p < 0.001), alignment (p=0.01), and level of activity. (p < 0.001) Of the 32 agility total ankles that were installed, 31/32 (97%) were still in place at the conclusion of this study. Only 1 (3%) required revision. The overall complication rate was 16/32 (50%) with the majority of complications being impingement (8/32; 25%) and superficial wound breakdown (4/32; 12.5%). The re-operation rate was 6/32 (19%). There were no amputations or conversion to fusions. Conclusion: Patients with agility TAA as evaluated at this Canadian institution, showed significant reductions in post-operative pain and increased foot and ankle mobility. The agility TAA, when considered in the context of the patient and their demands, can be a relatively safe and durable method of treatment for ankle arthritis

Ankle arthrodesis for isolated ankle arthritis has a high patient satisfaction level; however, gait analysis and functional outcome measurements demonstrate substantial disability. The high patient satisfaction may reflect the extent of disability present prior to the intervention. This study demonstrates that the presence of subtalar or talonavicular arthritis and/or limited motion is a negative predictor for a satisfactory outcome. The risk of developing arthritis of these joints increases with time and therefore the patient can expect a deterioration of their initial result. Ankle arthrodesis should be considered a salvage procedure. Viable alternatives that preserve motion should continue to be explored. The purpose of this study was to utilize gait analysis and validated outcome measures to assess the results of an ankle arthrodesis and compare these results to a healthy age – sex matched control group. Isolated Ankle arthrodesis has a high patient satisfaction rate; however, gait analysis and functional outcome scores demonstrate a significant difference when compared to controls. The presence of limited subtalar and midfoot motion and/or arthritis correlates with a poor clinical result. This study will help the clinician predict outcomes and better educate patients as to the expected results following ankle arthrodesis. Twenty-six patients with an isolated ankle arthrodesis underwent gait analysis and functional outcome assessment using AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scale, MODEMS (includes SF-36) and Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS). A radiographic analysis was preformed. Mean follow-up was 3.7 years. Results were compared to a group of twenty-six controls. Seventy-seven percent were satisfied and eighty-eight percent would recommend it to a friend. These perceived outcomes did not correlate well with their average Functional Outcome scores and gait analysis. The AOFAS score rated 46% as excellent or good. The MODEMS identified significant differences in Physical Function, Role-Physical and Physical Composite means when compared to controls. The AOS identified significant differences in Pain and Disability means. Gait analysis demonstrated significant differences in stride length, cadence, hip flexion, hindfoot flexion, hindfoot inversion and midfoot flexion. Decreased hindfoot and midfoot motion correlated with poorer outcome scores. Poor radiographic scores correlated with decreased hindfoot/midfoot motion and poorer clinical outcomes. Ankle arthrodesis should be considered a salvage procedure. Viable alternatives that preserve ankle motion should continue to be explored

Purpose: The global utilization of total ankle arthroplasty (TAR) has been increasing over the past decade; however there are a limited number of published prospective studies assessing intermediate and long term outcomes. The purpose of this clinical series is to prospectively review the mid-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of the Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement (STAR) performed at two Academic Canadian University Centres. Method: Between 1998 and 2005, 113 STARs were implanted into 99 patients at two Canadian centres. Prospective clinical and radiographic follow-up was performed. Validated and non-validated outcome questionnaires consisting of the AAOS foot and ankle questionnaire (a composite questionnaire made up of unaltered versions of the SF-36), AOFAS Hindfoot score, Foot Function Index (FFI), Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS) were completed in one arm (63/113 implanted TARs). In the other arm, (50/114) the patients were followed retrospectively with the same measures. Both groups had prospective radiographic follow-up using measures described by Wood et al. Results: The average follow-up for both groups was 46.3 ± 17.6 months (or 3.8 years). Of the 113 implanted STARs, 33 (29.2%) required a re-operation. Of those, 20 (17.7%) went on to be revised. Six patients had repeat revision operations for a total of 26 revision operations. Of the 26 revision operations 14 (54%) were polyethylene liner exchanges, and 12 (46%) were revision of the metallic components. The median time to revision was 39.5 months. Three prosthesis (2.6%) went on to have a deep infection of their STAR. All three were effectively managed without requiring explantation of the STAR. One patient had infection in their revision IM Nail. Of the 113 initially implanted prostheses, 101 (89.3%) of the original TARs remained implanted at the conclusion of the study. Sustained benefit, across questionnaires, from the STAR was observed to persist to final follow up. 115/116 (99%) ankles followed showed evidence of osteolysis at the last STAR follow-up. The osteolysis was found to occur more commonly around the talar component, but occurred, for the most part, in a recognizable pattern around both the talus and the tibia. No significant differences between the two centers in pre-operative or intra-operative data were identified. Conclusion: The STAR, in the mid-term, shows acceptable survival and revision rates. There are, however, some concerning findings on radiographic follow-up. It appears, upon initial investigation, that initial component position may be a factor that predicts concerning radiographic changes. Further investigation is required to substantiate this

Purpose. Coronal plane malalignment at the level of the tibiotalar joint is not uncommon in advanced ankle joint arthritis. It has been stated that preoperative varus or valgus deformity beyond 15 degrees is a relative contraindication and deformity beyond 20 degrees is an absolute contraindication to ankle joint replacement. There is limited evidence in the current literature to support these figures. The current study is a prospective clinical and radiographic comparative study between patients who underwent total ankle arthroplasty with coronal plane varus tibiotalar deformities greater than 10 degrees and patients with neutral alignment, less than 10 degrees of deformity. Method. Thirty-six ankles with greater than 10 degrees of varus alignment were compared to thirty-six ankles which were matched for implant type, age, gender, and year of surgery. Patients completed preoperative and yearly postoperative functional outcome scores including the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot scores, the Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS) and the Short Form-36 Standard Version 2.0 Health Survey. Weightbearing preoperative and postoperative radiographs were obtained and reviewed by four examiners (AC, AQ, TD, TT) and measurements were taken of the degree of coronal plane deformity. Results. After a mean follow-up of 27 months (9–54), the varus ankles improved significantly on the AOFAS (P<0.0001), AOS-Pain Score (P<0.0001), AOS-Disability Score (P<0.0001), and SF-36 Physical Component Score (P<0.0001). There was no improvement in SF-36-Mental Component Score. (P=0.722). There was no statistically significant differences between the two groups when comparing AOFAS (P=0.155), AOS-Pain Score (P=0.854), AOSDisability Score (P=0.593), SF-36-Physical Component Score (P=0.433), SF-36 Mental Component Score (P=0.633). Sixteen of Thirty-Six ankles in the varus group needed a secondary procedure (implant failure, infection, malalignment) which was approaching significance in comparison to eight ankles in the neutral group. (P = 0.079). Secondary procedures in the varus group included: tendon transfers, calcaneal / metatarsal / malleolar ostoetomies and ligament reconstructions. Radiographically, the pre-operative coronal plane varus tibiotalar deformity averaged 19.4 6.4 and postoperatively 1.44 2.6 (P< 0.0001). There was no statistical difference in post operative tibiotalar alignment between the varus and neutral groups (P<0.05). Conclusion. The clinical outcome of TAR performed in ankles with pre-operative varus alignment >10 degrees is comparable with that of neutrally aligned ankles. The increased number of secondary procedures in the varus group was attributed to the complexity of the deformity and the steep learning curve. Outcomes as measured radiographically and through validate scores were similar to patients without deformity suggesting that varus coronal plane deformity of the talus is not a contraindication to total ankle replacement

Purpose. To investigate the effect of obesity on functional outcome following total ankle arthroplasty. Method. We identified 43 obese patients (46 ankles) (BMI > 30kg/m2), using a prospectively collected database of total ankle arthroplasties. Inclusion criteria included: (a) Post-traumatic or inflammatory arthritis; (b) Minimum two-year follow-up, (c) Coronal plane deformity less than 10 degrees. Exclusion criteria: (a) Co-morbidity affecting physical function; (b) Recent total joint arthroplasty. American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS), Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS) and SF-36 questionnaires were used preoperatively and at latest follow-up. Revision was defined as any intervention requiring replacement of part or whole of the prosthesis. A control group of non-obese individuals (BMI 18.5–29.9kg/m2) was devised matching for age within 10 years, gender, diagnosis, implant and length of follow-up (within 1 year). From the original group of 46 ankles, we matched 28 ankles, thereby constructing two groups for comparison (matched obesity and control). Results. From the original obesity group (n=46, mean BMI 34.7, age 65.1 years and follow-up 3.5 years), four patients were lost to follow-up. There were 10 revisions (21.7%) including five for liner exchange, four full component and one revision to fusion. Statistically significant (p<0.001) improvements were detected with all outcome measures (AOFAS, AOS and SF-36). In the matched obesity and control groups we used 11 STAR, 11 Mobility and six Hintegra implants. Delayed wound healing affected one patient in each group. In the matched obesity group (mean BMI 35), there were six revisions (three liner exchange, three full component) (21.4%), at a mean of 3.2 years. One patient was lost to follow-up (known to be revised). Statistically significant improvements were noted with all outcome measures. In the control group (mean BMI 26.1), there were three revisions (two liner exchange and one full component) (10.7%), at a mean of 2.3 years. All patients were followed-up. Statistically significant improvements were associated with all outcome measures except the mental component summary of the SF-36 (52.2 to 54, p=0.37). The same score pre-operatively was lower in the matched obesity group (45 vs. 52.2, p=0.193). Overall, no difference was found in mean outcome score improvement between groups. In the matched obesity group, the mean pre-operative AOS pain score was higher (58.8 vs. 46.5) (p=0.016), as was the preoperative AOS disability score (68.4 vs. 58.5) (p=0.082). The mean post-operative AOS pain and disability scores were also higher, although not reaching significance (p=0.096 and p=0.241 respectively). Conclusion. Obesity is associated with greater functional and psychological preoperative burden, although the overall improvement in functional outcome is comparable to non-obese matched controls. Obese patients can expect a significantly higher revision rate (21.4% vs 10.7%) within five years of surgery

Aims

To describe outcome reporting variation and trends in non-pharmacological randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of distal tibia and/or ankle fractures.