Introduction: Hip pain in young adults can be associated with radiographic finding of acetabular labral tears in magnetic resonance arthrography. Acetabular labral tears can occur in dysplastic hips and in arthrotic hips as well, but often no comobidity is found. Up to now there is no prospective study published following patients with magnetic resonance arthrography verified acetabular labral tears over time and re-evaluating them with MR years later. There is also no stage related therapy published according to labral damage. The aim of this study was to follow 100 MRI verified acetabular labral tears for four years. Material and methods: Study design was prospective, observers were blinded. At primary investigation 36 clinical and 30 radiological parameters were recorded. At follow up these factors were recorded again and additionally SF36 and Harris Hip score were recorded. Results: 100 patients with average age 42 were included. 91% of all patients could be followed for over 48 months. 55 operations were performed in 50 patients . 20 patients showed concomitant developmental dysplasia of the hip, 16 patients arthrosis, 40 patients both and 15 patients had a labral lesion alone. The last group of patients never required any operation. 28 patients had a labral lesion grade I, 29 grade II, 34 grade III. Patients with grade III lesions had a significantly lower HHS at the first examination. At follow up between all groups of patients no difference regarding any clinical parameter was found. Operations were only necessary if comorbidity (dysplasia or arthrosis) was found. No single radiologic or clinical parameter could predict operation. Nine of thirteen labral surgeries were revised (triple osteotomies or THR). No correlation between severity of labral lesion at first MRI and any parameter at follow up could be found. Conclusion: If no comorbidity was found an acetabular labral tear alone never needed operative treatment. Although there exist a series of different operative treatment opportunities in meniscal/glenoid labrum surgery , we could not find the need for surgical intervention if the acetabular labral tear occurs alone. We therefore recommend physiotherapy and non – operative treatment for these patients

Purpose: Acetabular labral tears are most commonly associated with minor or atraumatic events. As a result, it is likely that these tears occur in the presence of an abnormal hip joint. The purpose of this investigation was to establish whether anterior hip impingement, secondary to an anterior femoral offset deficiency from a pistol grip deformity, was a common and poorly recognized cause of acetabular labral tears. Methods: Sixty-five consecutive patients who underwent a hip arthroscopy and were found to have a labral tear were evaluated. Preoperative hip radiographs were evaluated for abnormalities of the femur and /or acetabulum. The patient’s outcome with respect to resolution to pain and mechanical symptoms was assessed. Results: All labral tears identified at the time of hip arthroscopy were found to be located anteriorly. A pistol grip deformity of the proximal femur was identified on the preoperative radiographs in 92% of the patients. Labral excision resulted in complete resolution of hip pain in only 8 (28%). With the remaining 72% experiencing mild or moderate pain. Conclusions: Acetabular labral tears are the result of repetitive femoral-acetabular impingement, from a pistol grip deformity, with eventual tearing of the labrum from a relatively minor trauma. This is analogous to a rotator cuff repair in the shoulder that is secondary to repetitive impingement by the acromium. Decompression or correction of the anterior hip impingement should routinely be considered at the time of labral surgery to provide complete relief of symptoms and diminish the risk of future joint degeneration

Since its creation, labral repair has become the preferred method among surgeons for the arthroscopic treatment of acetabular labral tears resulting in pain and dysfunction for patients. Labral reconstruction is performed mainly in revision hip arthroscopy but can be used in the primary setting when the labrum cannot be repaired or is calcified. The purpose of this study was to compare the survival between primary labral repair and labral reconstruction with survival defined as no further surgery (revision or total hip replacement). Patients who underwent labral repair or reconstruction between January 2005 and December 2018 in the primary setting were included in the study. Patients were included if they had primary hip arthroscopy with the senior author for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), involving either labral reconstruction or labral repair, and were within the ages of 18 and 65 at the time of surgery. Exclusion criteria included confounding injuries (Leggs Calves Perthes, avascular necrosis, femoral head fracture, etc.), history of unilateral or bilateral hip surgeries, or Tönnis grades of 2 or 3 at the time of surgery. Labral repairs were performed when adequate tissue was available for repair and labral reconstruction was performed when tissue was absent, ossified or torn beyond repair. A total of 501 labral repairs and 114 labral reconstructions performed in the primary setting were included in the study. Labral reconstruction patients were older (37±10) compared to labral repair (34±11).(p=0.021). Second surgeries were required in 19/114 (17%) of labral reconstruction and 40/501(8%) [odds ratio: 2.3; 95% CI 1.3 to 4.2] (p=0.008). Revision hip arthroscopy were required in 6/114(5%) labral reconstructions and 33/501(6.5%) labral repair (p=0.496). Total hip replacement was required in 13/114 labral reconstructions and 7/501 labral repairs [odds ratio:9.1 95%CI 3.5 to 23] (p=< 0.01). The mean survival for the labral repair group was 10.2 years (95%CI:10 to 10.5) and 11.9 years (98%CI:10.9 to 12.8) in the labral reconstruction group. Conversion to total hip was required more often following primary labral reconstruction. Revision hip arthroscopy rates were similar between groups as was the mean survival, with both over 10 years. Similar survival was seen in labral repair and reconstruction when strict patient selection criteria are followed

Background: Acetabular labral tears are increasingly recognised as a cause of hip pain in young adults and middle aged patients. Degenerative acetabular conditions and sporting activities can cause labral injury. Recent interest has focussed on anterior femoroacetabular impingement as a cause of labral injury, progressive articular cartilage damage and secondary osteoarthritis. Labral tears are difficult to diagnose clinically or with conventional radiographic techniques. Aim: The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of MR arthrography in locating labral tears and articular cartilage defects compared with hip arthroscopy. Materials and Methods: 200 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of acetabular labral tear underwent hip arthroscopy. All of them had a preoperative Magnetic Resonance Arthrogram done by a single musculoskeletal radiologist using a standard protocol. The labrum was assessed for abnormalities of morphology and signal intensity. Acetabular articular cartilage defects were expressed as a reduction in joint space. All hip arthroscopies were done by a single surgeon after a trial period of conservative therapy consisting of activity modification, physiotherapy and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications. All procedures were recorded digitally and documented in an operative report. Labral tears and acetabular cartilage abnormalities were described by location and appearance. Results: Comparison of MRA and hip arthroscopy findings demonstrate MRA to have a sensitivity of 100%, positive predictive value of 99%, negative predictive value of 100% and accuracy of 99% in predicting labral tears. MRA correctly identified the location of labral tears in 90% of cases. Acetabular cartilage abnormalities were under recognised by MRA (43 hips on MRA vs 54 hips on arthroscopy). MRA was not sensitive enough to pick up early delamination of cartilage adjacent to labral tear in 6 hips. Conclusion: Hip MRA with radial reformatting has high accuracy rates in diagnosing and localising hip labral lesions

Background. Acetabular labral tears can cause pain and microinstability and are the most common indication for hip arthroscopy. Hip labral repair demonstrates better clinical outcome scores at a mean of 3.5 years post surgery than labral excision and tends to be performed in a younger age group. While different labral stitch configurations are possible, the most frequently used are a mattress stitch passed though the hip labrum at its widest part, or a simple loop surrounding the labrum. To determine the strength of variousrepair techniques and the impact suture passer sizesonhip labrum failure after cyclic loading. Methods. 35 unattached fresh-frozen bovine hip labrums were assigned to 5 repair techniques (7 specimens each): Group 1: horizontal mattress using a penetrating grasper; Group 2: vertical mattress using a penetrating grasper; Group 3: vertical mattress using asuture lasso; Group 4: Oblique repair using a penetrating grasper; Group 5: vertical mattress using a penetrating grasper and monopolar radio frequency device. Using a materials testing machine and after a 10N preload, each contruct was subjected to 20 cycles at 5N–80N. Cyclic elongation, peak-to-peak displacement, ultimate failure load, stiffness, and failure mode were recorded. Results. Group 1 (249N) had lower ultimate load than groups 2 (277N), 3 (289N), 4 (281N), and 5 (278N) (p<0.05) and higher peak to peak displacement, cyclic elongation (14mm) than group 3 (12mm) (p<0.05). Group 2 (15mm) had higher peak to peak displacement than group 3 (p<0.05). Group 3 had lower cyclic elongation and peak to peak displacements than group 4 (p<0.05). Conclusion. A horizontal mattress hip labrum repair demonstrates lower ultimate failure load than a vertical mattress or an oblique suture repair. A smaller diameter suture passing device demonstrated less cyclic displacement but no difference in ultimate failure load than a large diameter device. Radiofrequency treatment did not have any effect on the strength of the suture repair configuration. Level of evidence. Level 5

Labral tears can lead to disabling hip pain however underlying structural (femoroacetabular impingement) and developmental abnormalities predisposing to labral pathology may be left untreated if the peripheral compartment is ignored during hip arthroscopy. Femoroace-tabular impingement (FAI) can be secondary to abnormal morphologic features involving either the proximal femur and/or the acetabulum. Both acetabular labral tears and FAI lead to premature osteoarthritis of the hip. Early diagnosis and treatment of these hip pathologic abnormalities is important, not only to provide pain relief but also to prevent the development of osteoarthritis. Purpose: To describe the technique for arthroscopy of the peripheral compartment of the hip joint without traction. Methods: We performed 9 hip arthroscopies without traction from a lateral and and anterolateral portals in the supine position. After a traditional central arthroscopy with traction, 60 degrees of flexion at the hip joint without traction allowed relaxation of the anterior capsule and increased the intra-articular volume of the peripheral compartment. Results: Inspection of the peripheral compartment was obtained from the anterolateral portal. The anterior neck area, medial neck area, medial head area, anterior head area, lateral head area and lateral neck area were viewed. In 3 patients, loose bodies were removed. In 1 patient with PVNS synovial biopsy was taken and synovectomy was performed. Osteochondroplasty was performed in 5 patients for femoroacetabular impingement. No complications were observed. Conclusions: Hip arthroscopy without traction is mandatory to complete assessment and adequate treatment of the painful hip

Arthroscopic labral debridement has become and accepted mode of treatment for acetabular labral tears (ALTs) and yet results in literature are few and conflicting especially with regards presence of cartilage damage and its influence on outcome. Aim of our prospective cohort study was to look at outcome of ALTs post arthroscopic limbectomy using validated questionnaires at average of 2 years. We also looked at the sensitivity of MR arthrography in detecting ALTs and cartilage damage. Consecutive cohort of 82 patients who were suspected of having ALTs by senior author had MR arthrography followed by hip arthroscopy. All patients filled out a WOMAC, NAHS scores before and after the operation. All patients who were followed up also filled an especially designed five-point functional questionnaire. At time of arthroscopy the presence of labral tear, its position in the acetabulum and degree of cartilage damage (based on Outerbridge classification) were recorded and correlated with Mra and patient outcome. Seventy six patients were found to have a labral tear, with majority of these lesions in the anterior or antero-superior quadrant. 59% of patients were shown to have an associated degree of cartilage damage. Although overall all patients showed significant improvement in their functional scores, those with high grade cartilage damage had poorer results in comparison. We also found that patients with older age are at higher risk of requiring a THJR in the first 2 years following arthroscopy. MRa proved to a sensitive tool at detecting labral pathology but not so at identifying presence of cartilage damage. Arthroscopic debridement of ALTs in patients presenting with mechanical hip symptoms provides good functional outcome, however it should be used with caution in those with high grade articular cartilage damage and older age group where there is higher likelihood of failure