Identification of the causal pathogen is crucial in the management of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip. Unfortunately, it was often difficult and negative culture could be a common findings. This situation made the treatment of PJI of the hip became more challenging. The negative culture finding resulted in a doubtful diagnosis of infection, and poses difficulty in choosing the appropriate antibiotics. Here we compared the treatment outcome of two-stage revision arthroplasty for culture-negative versus culture-positive PJI of the hip. We retrospectively reviewed patients who received two-stage revision for PJI of the hip between January 2010 to June 2015. All patients was planned to received articulated antibiotic cement-spacer as the first stage and revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) as the second stage of the procedure. Out of total 94 patients, 10 patients was loss to follow-up and excluded from the study. We devided the rest of 84 patients into two groups: culture-negative group (n: 27) and culture-positive group (n: 57). We compared all relevant medical records and the treatment outcome between the two groups.Aim
Method
Need for hip or knee arthroplasty is rapidly increasing in aging society nowadays. Accordingly, orthopedic surgeries for patients with various diseases of high mortality rates are becoming indispensable. Patients with liver cirrhosis undergoing major orthopedic surgery like joint arthroplasty are at risk of many complications including infection and excessive bleeding. In this study, we want to present helpful measures to prevent expected complications that can occur with hip or knee arthroplasty performed on patients with liver cirrhosis through comparative analysis on the prognosis of relevant patients studied at our hospitals. The study involves a retrospective comparison on 210 patients who underwent hip (71 patients) or knee (138 patients) arthroplasty in Chonnam National University Hospital, Hwasun Chonnam National University Hospital or Chonnam National University Bitgoeul Hospital. Prognoses of patients with underlying disease of liver cirrhosis and those without are compared with measures of amount of bleeding, transfer to an intensive care unit or medical department, duration of hospital stay, readmission within 30 days, 90 days and post-operative complication. To find out the rationale behind the differences in prognosis between these two groups, comparisons on total surgical time and blood loss during surgery were made. Also, the objectivity of the surgical treatment at our hospitals was ensured through comparing the postoperative short- and long-term mortality rates of the patients with liver cirrhosis who underwent hip or knee arthroplasty at our hospitals.Background
Patients and method
The patients with high hip dislocation due to the sequelae of septic hip or neglected Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH) show severely impaired gait pattern. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) for these patients are expected to restore gait pattern by establishing better joint stability and biomechanics. To our knowledge, no study have investigated about objective change in gait parameters after total hip arthroplasty (THA) for these patients. So, we are to prospectively evaluate change in gait patterns after THA. Between 2012 and 2013, 11 patients with highly dislocated hip underwent unilateral THA with subtrochanteric osteotomy. There was 6 patients with DDH sequelae and 5 patients with septic hip sequelae. Spatio-temporal gait analysis was performed preoperatively and at 12 months after THA. We followed the patient 3, 6, 12 months and then annually postoperatively. The gait patterns were analyzed by several parameters such as cadence, speed, stride length, step length, step time, initial double support (IDS), terminal double support (TDS), stance phase and swing phase by a three-dimensional (3D) high-speed motion-capturing system (eight Eagle® cameras; Motion Analysis, Santa Rosa, CA, USA). Also dynamic range of motion (ROM) of hip joint and ground-reaction forces (GFR) were recorded. Clinical outcome was evaluated by using the Harris Hip Score (HHS). Radiographic assessments were evaluated for the changes in leg length discrepancy (LLD).Background
Methods
