The goal of treating artificial joint infection is to relieve the infection quickly and re-establish joint function, but many patients have underlying diseases, and treatment is often made problematic by the diversity of the causative bacteria. In this study we assessed the factor that enabled revision arthroplasty in patients with infection after artificial hip arthroplasty, including bipolar hip arthroplasty, in our hospital. The subjects were the 16 patients (16 hips) with infection after hip arthroplasty who were treated in our hospital during the past 10 years. There were 7 males and 9 females, and their mean age was 69.8 years. Primary total hip arthroplasty had been performed in 6 hips, revision hip arthroplasty in 8 hips, and bipolar hip arthroplasty in 2 hips. Infected implants were removed as soon as possible and delayed reimplantations with an interval antibiotic spacer were attempted in all patients. 9 hips were successful in reimplantation (reimplantation group) and 7 hips were impossible (No reimplantation group). In this study we investigated age, complications, body mass index (BMI), body temperature, pain, rate of resistant bacteria, number of hip surgery prior to infection and clinical manifestations compared to two groups.Introduction
Subjectives and Methods
Excellent results with use of tapered wedged cementless stem have been reported. The purpose of this study was to clarify the indication of tapered wedged cementless stems for patients with poor bone quality. Sixty-five hemiarthroplasties in 79 patients with diagnosis of femoral neck fracture were performed between February 2004 and August 2011. 14 patients were lost to follow-up after surgery, and it is 19 patients among the leaving 65 patients had the stovepipe canal. There were 2 men and 16 women, with a mean age at time of surgery 85 years (range, 75–92 years). All components were tapered wedged cementless stem (LINEAR: Encore, Kinectiv: ZIMMER). Evaluation of patient followed includes radiographic analysis (canal flare index, canal fill rate, stem alignment, bone reaction, and stem stability) and recording complication.Background
Method
Total knee arthroplasty (hereinafter TKA), it is thought that the setting position of each component and the angle have a big influence on surgical results. Preoperative planning with accurate and detailed 3D templates are has been done in many facilities in TKA. However, in the setting position, the 2D evaluation with X-rays is still common after operation, and there are few facilities going in 3D image. A three-dimensional evaluation method of the TKA includes a rating system using CT and the MRI, but influence (artifactual) with the metal occurs, and a detailed evaluation becomes difficult. In this study, we evaluated it after the matching method with the 3D plan using “Physio-Knee” where the materials of the femoral component were alumina ceramics in the preoperation of each component setting position by the CT before and after operation. We intended for 12 knees which we performed TKA used the Physio-Knee by December, 2011 from October, 2010. The all cases woman, the operation average age were 68.9 years old (62 to 79 years). For these, we performed CT photography of the whole lower limbs after operation like preoperation and each component setting was located after operation using evaluation software made in LEXI company and evaluated it.Introduction
Patients and methods
Aseptic loosening and osteolysis may cause significant periprosthetic femoral bone destruction, often necessitating bypass of the deficient proximal femur to obtain stable fixation in the distal diaphysis. The purpose of the present study was to report our results of femoral component revision using a distally locked revision femoral stem for the treatment of the severe proximal femoral bone loss. We evaluated 21 hips in 20 patients who underwent revision hip arthroplasty associated with Paprosky grade-IIIB or IV femoral deficiencies. Three hips were associated with a Vancouver type-B3 periprosthetic femoral fracture. The mean age at the time of revision was 70.8 (51–82) years old with 5 men and 15 women. The mean duration of follow-up was 5.1 years. The femoral implant used for the revision was the Cannulok Revision Prosthesis in 16 hips and the Huckstep interlocking stem in five. Gaps between the stem and the host bone were filled and impacted with bone chips and morselized bone prior to stem insertion. One femoral implants were resected because of deep infection Subsidence was absent and stable fixation was achieved in all patients. Non-progressive radiolucent lines in zones 1 and 7 according to Gruen’s classification were detected in five cases. Cortical hypertrophy around the interlocking screws were seen in ten cases. No disadvantages or complications of the interlocking screws were observed. All the fractures have united within three to five months. Intraoperative fractures in the diaphyseal area occurred in five hips in which trochanteric osteotomy was used. A diaphyseal fixation of the femoral stem with distal interlocking screws appears to provide primary axial and rotational stability of the prosthesis and early mobilization. This implant may provide a satisfactory alternative for the management of revision hip surgery in the presence of a loose femoral component with massive bone loss. Longer-term follow-up data from this study will be needed to confirm these outcomes.
Aseptic loosening and osteolysis may cause significant periprosthetic femoral bone destruction, often necessitating bypass of the deficient proximal femur to obtain stable fixation in the distal diaphysis. The purpose of the present study was to report our results of femoral component revision using a distally locked revision femoral stem for the treatment of the severe proximal femoral bone loss. We evaluated 21 hips in 20 patients who underwent revision hip arthroplasty associated with Paprosky grade-IIIB or IV femoral deficiencies. Three hips were associated with a Vancouver type-B3 periprosthetic femoral fracture. The mean age at the time of revision was 70.8 (51–82) years old with 5 men and 15 women. The mean duration of follow-up was 5.1 years. The femoral implant used for the revision was the Cannulok Revision Prosthesis in 16 hips and the Huckstep interlocking stem in five. Gaps between the stem and the host bone were filled and impacted with bone chips and morselized bone prior to stem insertion. One femoral implants were resected because of deep infection Subsidence was absent and stable fixation was achieved in all patients. Non-progressive radiolucent lines in zones 1 and 7 according to Gruen’s classification were detected in five cases. Cortical hypertrophy around the interlocking screws were seen in ten cases. No disadvantages or complications of the interlocking screws were observed. All the fractures have united within three to five months. Intraoperative fractures in the diaphyseal area occurred in five hips in which trochanteric osteotomy was used. A diaphyseal fixation of the femoral stem with distal interlocking screws appears to provide primary axial and rotational stability of the prosthesis and early mobilization. This implant may provide a satisfactory alternative for the management of revision hip surgery in the presence of a loose femoral component with massive bone loss. Longer-term follow-up data from this study will be needed to confirm these outcomes.
Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) has been widely performed and successful clinical outcomes have been achieved for the patients with knee osteoarthritis which is generally known to cause ADL problem. Clinical and radiographic evaluations are commonly used when evaluating postoperative outcomes, among which kinetic analysis and gait analysis are considered essential to investigate the more detailed effect of the treatment. There is a controversy whether performing TKA on both knees simultaneously is appropriate in treating patients with bilateral knee osteoarthritis, in terms of the speed and effectiveness of gait recovery. In this study, we reviewed the significance of performing simultaneous bilateral TKA, by the results of preoperative and postoperative gait analysis.
Percutaneous radiofrequency neurotomy of the lumbar medial branch is a widely accepted treatment for pain of the lumber intervertebral joints. However its success rate has varied among authors. One reason for this inconsistency is the lack of method for objective evaluation of whether the nerve has been sufficiently denervated or not. This study has made possible real time and accurate monitoring of whether electrocauterization is properly executed or not. The subjects were 50 patients with law back pain persisting for 3 months or longer in whom facet block or medial branch block of posterior ramus was only temporarily effective. They ranged in age from 19 to 76 years (mean 54 years) and were followed up for 1 year to 7 years and 1 month (mean 2 years and 9 months). In our percutaneous radiofrequency neurotomy, the target point of denervation is defined as the groove between the mammillary process and accessory process (1) and complex muscle action potentials (CMAPs) of multifidus muscles are used as an index for objective evaluation of the effects of denervation. Improvements were observed immediately after the treatment in 39 patients (78%). The effects of this treatment, once attained, remained over a long period, and the duration of effects was 18–20 months as estimated by the cumulative success rate calculated using the Kaplan-Meyer method. Patients must be carefully selected for percutaneous radiofrequency neurotomy to be consistently effective, all the more because the procedure is simple. However, it is a reliable method for denervation of the lumbar medial branch and long-term relief from pain can be expected. This therapy, therefore, is an effective alternative for the treatment of chronic pain due to lumbar intervertebral arthropathy that resists conservative treatments and disturbs daily living.