header advert
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

General Orthopaedics

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_13 | Pages 15 - 15
1 Sep 2014
Lisenda L Linda Z Snyman F Kyte R
Full Access

Introduction

We conducted a retrospective study of 61 patients, suffering from osteosarcoma, who presented to the CMJAH tumour Unit between 2007 and 2011.

Results

The average time to presentation to the unit, post-onset of symptoms, was 4.5 months. Most patients, 43/61 (70%), presented initially to a hospital or clinic; only 3/61patients (5%) presented first to traditional healers and 15/61 (25%) to a GP. 16 patients (26%) came from other South African provinces and 3 patients (5%) were international. 3 Patients (5%) presented with a pathological fracture. 3/61 (5%) patients were HIV positive, 8 unknown and the rest were HIV negative.

A standard osteosarcoma work-up was performed. 4 patients (7%) were Enneking Stage 2A, 41 patients (67%) were Stage 2B and 16 patients (26%) presented with metastases (Stage 3). Biopsy was performed on average of 3 weeks post-presentation (delay largely due to MRI).

Surgery was undertaken in 46 patients (75%), with the aim of achieving wide local resection margins: 13 (21%) limb salvage procedures and 33 (79%) limb ablations were performed. 4 patients refused further treatment. 54/57 patients (95%) underwent chemotherapy and, of these, 44 (81%) underwent a neo-adjuvant chemotherapy protocol and 2 patients (4%) received post-adjuvant chemotherapy only. 19/61 patients (31%) defaulted follow-up: of these 19 patients, 15 (79%) were amputees, 1 (5%) was a limb salvage patient and 4 (16%) were un-operated.

Two patients developed local recurrence: 1 was treated with amputation & the other with further excision. Palliative Radiotherapy was administered to 2 patients.

In March 2013, 41 patients were contactable. Of these, 17/41 (41%) were alive and of the surviving 17 patients, 9 (81%) were limb salvage patients and 6 (38%) were amputees. Of the 12 patients, who had initially presented with metastases, only I patient (8%) was alive. Only 1 of the 3 patients, who initially presented with pathological fracture, was traceable and alive.

NO DISCLOSURES


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_29 | Pages 18 - 18
1 Aug 2013
Kyte R Snyman F
Full Access

The benefits of the Lautenbach suction-instillation have been recognised as an adjunct to the eradication of bone and joint infection. With the wide acceptance of external suction dressings as a means of accelerating wound healing and evacuating exudates, there are advantages to a system which combines these benefits for deep cavities with the direct infusion of antibiotics to increase local tissue concentrations. This is particularly useful in the extensive tissue defects encountered with wide excision of musculoskeletal tumours and reconstruction with mega prostheses or bulk allograft (with many patients undergoing adjuvant chemo- and radiotherapy), and also in complex orthopaedic trauma cases with tissue loss. These situations are associated with a reported infection incidence of up to 40%.

Materials.

The results of use of the Lautenbach suction-instillation system were studied prospectively in 100 patients over a 7 year period.

Results.

Sixty cases followed wide excision of musculoskeletal tumours and 40 were caused by complex trauma. Due to logistics, many tumour cases were managed post-operatively in a septic orthopaedic ward. Immediate soft tissue cover was achieved in all tumour cases, utilising flaps where necessary, but cover was delayed for up to 3 weeks in some trauma cases. One late infection (2 years post-op) in a bulk allograft reconstructed sarcoma patient and 1 trauma infection were noted. Both were successfully eradicated with a secondary debridement & Lautenbach suction-instillation.