Classifying trochlear dysplasia (TD) is useful to determine the treatment options for patients suffering from patellofemoral instability (PFI). There is no consensus on which classification system is more reliable and reproducible for this purpose to guide clinicians in order to treat PFI. There are also concerns about validity of the Dejour classification (DJC), which is the most widely used classification for TD, having only a fair reliability score. The Oswestry-Bristol classification (OBC) is a recently proposed system of classification of TD and the authors report a fair-to-good interobserver agreement and good-to-excellent intra-observer agreement in the assessment of TD. The aim of this study was to compare the reliability and reproducibility of these two classifications. 6 assessors (4 consultants and 2 registrars) independently evaluated 100 magnetic resonance axial images of the patella-femoral joint for TD and classified them according to OBC and DJC. These assessments were again repeated by all raters after 4 weeks. The inter and intra-observer reliability scores were calculated using Cohen's kappa and Cronbach's alpha. Both classifications showed good to excellent interobserver reliability with high alpha scores. The OBC classification showed a substantial intra-observer agreement (mean kappa 0.628)[p<0.005] whereas the DJC showed a moderate agreement (mean kappa 0.572) [p<0.005]. There was no significant difference in the kappa values when comparing the assessments by consultants to those by registrars, in either classification systems. This large study from a non-founding institute shows both classification systems to be reliable for classifying TD based on magnetic resonance axial images of the patella-femoral joint, with the simple to use OBC having a higher intra-observer reliability score compared to the DJC.
Surgical fixation of greater tuberosity fractures in the shoulder is the choice of treatment even if the fragment is minimally displaced. This helps to reduce the incidence of impingement secondary to a malunited tuberosity fragment especially in younger patients. We evaluated the functional outcome of our patients treated with open reduction and internal fixation of these fractures using cancellous screws. 19 patients with a mean age of 57.1 years (range 27–84) with 19 isolated greater tuberosity fractures treated with cancellous screws were included. These patients were evaluated after an average follow up period of nearly four years (range 66–444 weeks) using the DASH score and the Constant and Murley score. They were also clinically assessed to check for signs of impingement.Introduction
Materials and Methods
