The purpose of this study was to determine if routine x-ray exposure produced any chemical oxidation of Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE), used for joint arthroplasty.

Three different polyethylene polymers were obtained from Biomet, Depuys and Howmedica. These samples had undergone sterilisation and packaging methods. Rectangular shapes of polymer were cut according to the standards specified by the ASTM (American Society For Testing and Materials). Eight samples of each polymer were obtained and divided randomly in to test and control subgroups. The test samples were exposed to ten x-rays with the standard dose used for the hip joint.

Polyethylene oxidation was measured using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. This technique can assess the incorporation of oxygen within the carbonyl region. Radiated and non-irradiated samples were compared in each polymer group.

Oxidation from the Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy was quantified by calculating the area under a signature absorption peak for UHMWPE (methylene band at 1370 cm-1) and an oxidation absorption peak (carbonyl band at 1720 cm-1). The ratio of the area of the oxidation peak to the area of the signature peak yields the carbonyl content, or oxidation, relative to the amount of polyethylene. There was no significant difference in oxidation after exposure to x-rays between test and control UHMWPE samples.

Although numerous studies have looked in to the effects of high dose radiation exposure on polyethylene, effects of routine x-rays have not been studied before. It is common practice to follow-up patients with joint replacements over a long period with xrays at each visit. Present study examined the effects of routine x-rays on oxidation of polyethylene. However there was no detectable oxidation after exposure to x-rays. This study paves way for further research in this direction.

Between December 1998 and December 1999 twenty-one patients with painful knee arthroplasties underwent assessment by radionuclide arthrography. There were eleven female and ten male patients, with an average age of 60 years at the time of the index procedure. The index procedure was a primary total knee arthroplasty, primary medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and revision medial UKA in seventeen, three and one patients respectively. Nineteen arthroplasties were uncemented and two were hybrids. All patients had previously been investigated by clinical examination, serological testing, fluoroscopic AP and lateral radiographs, and Tc99 bone scan with equivocal results. The presence of radionuclide about the tibial stem was considered diagnostic of tibial loosening. Nine patients underwent revision knee arthroplasty. The presence of radionuclide about the tibial stem correctly predicted a loose tibial component in four of five cases. Similarly, the absence of radionuclide about the tibial stem correctly predicted a stable tibial component in four of four cases. In the single misdiagnosed case the tibial component did not have a large central stem, had focal osteolysis about several screws, but remained stable. Radionuclide arthrogram is a useful tool in the investigation of painful knee arthroplasty. Radionuclide about the tibial stem is the key predictor of tibial component loosening.

Eighteen porous coated posterior stabilized prostheses, inserted without cement or screws have been reviewed. Six were revised within two years. One was infected. The remaining five were revised for persistent symptoms considered to be due to tibial component loosening. Three of the four improved after revision with cementing of the tibial component, the other has remained symptomatic. One patient was lost to follow-up. Clinical review of the remaining eleven was good or excellent at two years. Radiographs at two years, available in eight, revealed that all had a non progressive I mm radio-lucent line at the bone- tibial prosthesis interface. The lack of bony ingrowth and apparent symptomatic early loosening in the four revised, suggests that posterior stabilised tibial prostheses may require additional initial fixation. From our experience in this short series, it is recommend that the tibial component of this prosthesis and perhaps any other posterior stabilized design, be cemented or fixed with screws.

Ankle sprains are very common, and usually tear or partly tear one or more of the ligaments on the outer side of the ankle. The ankle joint is only designed to move up and down, whereas there is another joint immediately below the ankle joint, called the subtalar joint, which is designed to do the tilting in and out movement. If the foot tilts over too far, the subtalar joint reaches the end of its movement and then the ankle ligaments stretch and tear.

It is possible that variations of subtalar range of movement may contribute to ankle sprains or symptoms of weakness or instability. In particular, if the subtalar joint is unusually restricted in its movement, then the foot does not have to tilt far before the lateral ligaments tear.

If on the other hand the subtalar joint is particularly mobile and has excessive movement, then the foot may go right over without actually tearing ligaments and feel insecure or unstable simply as a result of abnormal excessive movement.

Recent studies have demonstrated what we have always suspected, that clinical examination and assessment of subtalar range of movement is highly unreliable. In order to accurately assess whether your subtalar range of movement is unusually restricted or excessive, the only standard and accurate method to date has been to obtain a CT scan.

We are now undertaking a study to establish whether plain xrays with a small metal clamp applied to the heel might not be a simpler, cheaper, quicker and equally reliable method of assessment of subtalar movement.

If you would like to know if your subtalar movement might be a contributing factor to either stiffness or insecurity of your ankle, we invite you to be examined clinically, by plain xrays at SPORTSMED•SA, and by a CT scan at Jones & Partners Radiology at Burnside. The xray and CT investigations would be bulk billed under Medicare so that you would not incur any personal cost and the information could well be helpful in assessing your ankle problem, or at least be reassuring that the subtalar joint has a normal range of movement.

The investigations can be arranged through your treating doctor, physiotherapist or podiatrist or by contacting Dr Roger Paterson, Foot and Ankle Surgeon, or Mr Stephen Landers, his Research Assistant, on Ph: 8362 7788.

The CT scan would be a very limited investigation resulting in minimum radiation exposure, comparable to the normal xrays. Further information on what is involved in having a CT scan is attached.

Neither the CT scan nor the plain xrays should cause any more than minor discomfort as the foot is tilted through its full range of movement, or from the padded pressure of the G clamp.

SPORTSMED•SA remains committed to excellence in treating active people of all ages, and through these investigations, we plan to further enhance the quality of assessment and care of people who suffer ankle problems.