IBBC (interfacial bioactive bone cement method, Oonishi) (1) is an excellent technique for augmenting cement-bone fixation in the long term. However, the technique is difficult and there are concerns over some points, such as bleeding control, disturbance of cement intrusion to anchoring holes by granules, difficulty of the uniform granular dispersion to the acetabular bone (Zone 1 in particular). To improve this technique, we have modified IBBC (M-IBBC), and investigated the short-term clinical results and radiographic changes. K-MAX HS-3 THA (Kyocera Medical, Japan), with cemented stem and all polyethylene cemented socket, was used for THA implants. Basically the third generation cementing technique was used for THA using bone cement. The socket fixation was performed with bone cement (Endurance, DePuy) and hydroxyapatite (HA) granules (Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2, Boneceram P; G-2, Olympus, Japan). In original IBBC technique, HA granules were dispersed on reamed acetabulum before cementing. In M-IBBC technique, HA granules were attached to bone cement on plastic plate, then inserted to reamed acetabulum and pressurized. HA granules (G-2) are 0.3–0.6mm in size, with 35–38% porosity and sintered at 1150Introduction
Materials and Methods
We have compared the short-term clinical results of total hip arthroplasty (THA) using PMMA bone cement and hydroxyapatite (HA) granules (interfacial bioactive bone cement method; IBBC) with the results of conventional method using PMMA bone cement. K-MAX HS-3 THA (JMM, Japan), with cemented titanium alloy stem and all polyethylene cemented socket, was used for THA implants. The third generation cement technique was used for the conventional THA (Group C) using bone cement (Endurance, DePuy). In the IBBC group (Group BC), the socket fixation was performed by the third generation cement technique with HA granules (Boneceram P; G-2, Olympus, Japan) according to the Ohnishi's method. In both groups, the stems were fixed by conventional cementing technique using cement gun. 76 hip joins (69 cases) were operated between April 2005 and August 2007, and followed. The group C (22 hips, 19 cases, average follow-up; 5.6 years, average age at operation; 64 years) and the group BC (54 hips, 50 cases, 5.4 years, 65 years) were investigatedPurpose
Materials and Methods
