Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_10 | Pages 72 - 72
1 May 2016
Tamura J Asada Y Nishida H Ota M Izeki M Yoshida S Hira Y Orita K Matsuda Y
Full Access

Introduction

IBBC (interfacial bioactive bone cement method, Oonishi) (1) is an excellent technique for augmenting cement-bone fixation in the long term. However, the technique is difficult and there are concerns over some points, such as bleeding control, disturbance of cement intrusion to anchoring holes by granules, difficulty of the uniform granular dispersion to the acetabular bone (Zone 1 in particular). To improve this technique, we have modified IBBC (M-IBBC), and investigated the short-term clinical results and radiographic changes.

Materials and Methods

K-MAX HS-3 THA (Kyocera Medical, Japan), with cemented stem and all polyethylene cemented socket, was used for THA implants. Basically the third generation cementing technique was used for THA using bone cement. The socket fixation was performed with bone cement (Endurance, DePuy) and hydroxyapatite (HA) granules (Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2, Boneceram P; G-2, Olympus, Japan). In original IBBC technique, HA granules were dispersed on reamed acetabulum before cementing. In M-IBBC technique, HA granules were attached to bone cement on plastic plate, then inserted to reamed acetabulum and pressurized. HA granules (G-2) are 0.3–0.6mm in size, with 35–38% porosity and sintered at 1150â��. 51 hip joints (49 cases) were operated between June 2010 and December 2011, and followed. The average follow-up was 3.9 years, and average age at operation was 66.5 years. The clinical results were evaluated by Japan Orthopaedic Association Hip Score (JOA score), and X-p findings were evaluated using antero-posterior radiographs. The locations of radiolucent lines were identified according to the zones described by Delee and Charnley for acetabular components, and Zone 1 was divided into two parts, outer Zone 1a and inner Zone 1b.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_15 | Pages 350 - 350
1 Mar 2013
Tamura J Asada Y Nishida H Oota M Matsuda Y
Full Access

Purpose

We have compared the short-term clinical results of total hip arthroplasty (THA) using PMMA bone cement and hydroxyapatite (HA) granules (interfacial bioactive bone cement method; IBBC) with the results of conventional method using PMMA bone cement.

Materials and Methods

K-MAX HS-3 THA (JMM, Japan), with cemented titanium alloy stem and all polyethylene cemented socket, was used for THA implants. The third generation cement technique was used for the conventional THA (Group C) using bone cement (Endurance, DePuy). In the IBBC group (Group BC), the socket fixation was performed by the third generation cement technique with HA granules (Boneceram P; G-2, Olympus, Japan) according to the Ohnishi's method. In both groups, the stems were fixed by conventional cementing technique using cement gun. 76 hip joins (69 cases) were operated between April 2005 and August 2007, and followed. The group C (22 hips, 19 cases, average follow-up; 5.6 years, average age at operation; 64 years) and the group BC (54 hips, 50 cases, 5.4 years, 65 years) were investigated