header advert
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_32 | Pages 18 - 18
1 Sep 2013
Mounsey E Muzammil A Snowden J Trimble K
Full Access

The International Commission on Radiological Protection has established standards for radiation protection. This study aims to determine actual and perceived radiation dose and audit safe practice when using image-intensifiers in theatre.

Between September 2012 and March 2013, 50 surgeons were surveyed during 39 procedures. Information collected by radiographers included the number of images the surgeons thought they used, actual number used, dose, screening time, number of people scrubbed, wearing thyroid collars and standing within 1m of the image-intensifier when in use.

The primary surgeon was more likely to estimate the number of images used correctly compared to the assistant. Supervising consultants were most accurate, followed by registrars as primary surgeons, consultants as primary surgeons then assisting registrars, and lastly SHOs. Most surgeons underestimated the number of images used. 87.5% of scrubbed staff were standing within 1m of the image-intensifier during screening and 36.5% were wearing thyroid protection. Three surgeons stated they were not wearing collars as they were unavailable.

We conclude that surgeons have a reasonable estimation of the x-rays used but are not undertaking simple steps to protect themselves from radiation. We plan to initiate an education program within the department and have ordered new, lightweight thyroid collars.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_32 | Pages 17 - 17
1 Sep 2013
Mounsey E Muzammil A Trimble K
Full Access

Recent reports observe that orthopaedic surgeons lack essential knowledge about ionising radiation. We aim to demonstrate perceived use of image-intensifiers by surgeons and awareness of radiation doses used during fractured neck of femur surgery.

Surgeons at a regional trauma centre were sent an online questionnaire. They were shown two neck of femur fracture radiographs and asked the total number of images they would use to reduce and fix the fracture with a dynamic-hip-screw / inter-medullary nail respectively. They were asked the maximum safe radiation dose, and that of ‘hip pining’ compared to CXR as outlined by the Ionising Radiation Regulations 1999.

For a DHS, consultants and registrars estimate their image use similarly. For IM nailing, consultants estimated higher image use than registrars, and double the number of X-rays taken for IM nailing compared to DHS. Knowledge levels regarding radiation doses during orthopaedic hip procedures are very low.

There is an expectation that more images will be used in IM nailing procedures. We plan to educate orthopaedic surgeons about radiation dose and safety. Correlating our findings with actual use of image in theatre when performing hip fracture surgery would extend the use of this study.