We aim to compare post-operative length of stay and cardiopulmonary morbidity in patients randomised to either navigated or conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Patients undergoing primary TKA for osteoarthritis were prospectively assigned randomly to either navigation-guided or control groups and blinded to this. All patients received a PFC implant (DePuy, Warsaw, IN). In the control group the standard femoral intramedullary and tibial extramedullary alignment rod was used. In the navigation group, the BrainLab (Munich, Germany) navigation system was used. All operations were carried out by one of two consultant orthopaedic knee surgeons. Length of post operative hospital stay and the development of cardiopulmonary complication were recorded and groups compared.Aim
Method
We aim to compare revision rates and functional outcome scores in between two contemporary total knee arthoplasty systems. A search was carried out of a prospectively maintained outcomes database to identify all patients receiving total knee replacement (TKR) in the department between 2005 and 2006, when evaluation of different knee arthroplasty systems was being undertaken. Data on the first 93 consecutive patients receiving a Scorpio (Stryker, Allendale, NJ) implant and the first 93 consecutively receiving a PFC (DePuy, Warsaw, IN) implant were reviewed. Four year revision rates and functional scores were recorded.Aim
Methods
Previous studies comparing cruciate retaining (CR) and cruciate sacrificing - posterior stabilised (PS) TKRs have failed to demonstrate a difference in outcomes based on numbers of patients recruited. This large study compares clinical outcomes in groups having PS and CR TKR and reports the results at 1 and 2 years post-operatively. A total of 683 patients undergoing TKR were consecutively enrolled in a prospective multi-centre study with 2 arms. In the first arm patients receiving a PS component were randomised to receive either a mobile bearing (176 patients) or fixed bearing (176 patients) implant. In the second arm, patients receiving a CR component were randomised to receive either a mobile bearing (161 patients) or fixed bearing (170 patients) implant. All patients were assessed preoperatively and at one and two years postoperatively using standard tools (Oxford, AKSS, Patellar Score) by independent nurse specialists. The data from the 2 arms of the trial were then analysed to compare differences between PS and CR implants.Introduction
Methods
