Burst fractures were simulated Burst fractures account for almost 30% of all spinal injuries, which may result in severe neurological deficit, spinal instability and hence life impairment1. The onset of the fracture is usually traumatic, caused by a high-energy impact loading. Comminution of the endplates and vertebral body, retropulsion of fragments within the canal and increase of the intrapedicular distance are typical indicators of the injury. Experimental and numerical studies have reported strain concentration at the base of the pedicles, suggesting that the posterior processes play a fundamental role in the fracture initiation2,3. However, little is known about the dynamic behaviour of the vertebra undergoing an impact load. The aim of this study was to provide an Summary Statement
Introduction
There are no standardised methods for assessing the cement flow behaviour in vertebroplasty. We propose a novel methodology to help understand the interaction of cement properties on the underlying displacement of bone marrow by bone cement in porous media. Concerns related to cement extravasation in vertebroplasty provide the motivation for the development of methodologies for assessing cements (novel and commercially available) and delivery systems. Reproducible and pathologically representative three-dimensional bone surrogates are used to understand the complex rheology underlying the two-phase flow in porous media.Summary Statement
Introduction
Interbody fusion aims to treat painful disc disease by demobilising the spinal segment through the use of an interbody fusion device (IFD). Diminished contact area at the endplate interface raises the risk of device subsidence, particularly in osteoporosis patients. The aim of the study was to ascertain whether vertebral body (VB) cement augmentation would reduce IFD subsidence following dynamic loading. Twenty-four human two-vertebra motion segments (T6–T11) were implanted with an IFD and distributed into three groups; a control with no cement augmentation; a second with PMMA augmentation; and a third group with calcium phosphate (CP) cement augmentation. Dynamic cyclic compression was applied at 1Hz for 24 hours in a specimen specific manner. Subsidence magnitude was calculated from pre and post-test micro-CT scans. The inferior VB analysis showed significantly increased subsidence in the control group (5.0±3.7mm) over both PMMA (1.6±1.5mm, p=.034) and CP (1.0±1.1mm, p=.010) cohorts. Subsidence in the superior VB to the index level showed no significant differences (control 1.6±3.0mm, PMMA 2.1±1.5mm, CP 2.2±1.2mm, p=.811). In the control group, the majority of subsidence occurred in the lower VB with the upper VB displaying little or no subsidence, which reflects the weaker nature of the superior endplate. Subsidence was significantly reduced in the lower VB when both levels were reinforced regardless of cement type. Both PMMA and CP cement augmentation significantly affected IFD subsidence by increasing VB strength within the motion segment, indicating that this may be a useful method for widening indications for surgical interventions in osteoporotic patients.
Over 85% of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) have bone disease, mostly affecting thoraco-lumbar vertebrae. Vertebral fractures can lead to pain and large spinal deformities requiring application of vertebroplasty (PVP). PVP could be enhanced by use of Coblation technique to remove lesions from compromised MM vertebrae prior to cement injection (C-PVP). 28 cadaveric MM vertebrae, were initially fractured (IF) up to 75% of its original height on a testing machine, with rate of 1mm/min. Loading point was located at 25% of AP-diameter, from anterior. Two augmentation procedure groups were investigated: PVP and C-PVP. All vertebrae were augmented with 15% of PMMA cement. At the end of each injection the perceived injection force (PIF) was graded on a 5-point scale (1 very easy to 5 almost impossible). Augmented MM vertebrae were re-fractured, following the same protocol as for IF. Failure load (FL) was defined as 0.1% offset evaluated from load displacement curves.INTRODUCTION
METHODS
