Reports cite up to 20% of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients are not satisfied. Recent focus on alignment and balance has perhaps overshadowed kinematics as a key determinant of outcomes. Some propose that reproducing the native knee kinematics of lateral-pivot motion in early flexion during walking will enact optimal TKA outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine if intra-operative kinematic patterns correlate with patient function, pain and satisfaction after TKA. A retrospective review of consecutive TKA's performed by two surgeons was performed. After final components were implanted and balanced, sensor-embedded tibial trials were inserted and kinematic patterns were recorded through range-of-motion. Femoro-tibial contact points were recorded at four distinct flexion points (0°, 45°, 90° and full flexion). Center of rotation kinematic patterns were calculated and categorized as medial pivot, lateral pivot or translation at each measurement range via established criteria. Knees with lateral (L) pivot in early flexion between 0 and 45 ° and medial (M) pivot beyond 90°, regardless of the mid-flexion pivot pattern, formed the experimental group designated as LXM. All other patterns were designated non-LXM and formed the control group. Modern, validated clinical outcome measures (Knee Society Score, EQ5D, UCLA) were obtained preoperatively and at minimum one-year postoperatively.Introduction
Methods
The purpose of TKA is to restore normal kinematics and functioning to diseased knees. The purpose of this study was to determine whether intraoperative kinematic data are correlated with minimum one-year outcomes following primary TKA. We reviewed data on 185 consecutive primary TKAs in which sensor-embedded tibial trials were used to evaluate kinematic patterns following traditional ligament balancing. Procedures were performed by two board-certified arthroplasty surgeons. The same implant design and surgical approach was used for all knees. Contact locations on the medial and lateral condyles were recorded for each patient at 0°, 45° and 90° of flexion, and full flexion. Vector equations were created by contact locations on the medial and lateral sides and the vector intersections determined the center of rotation between each measurement position. Center of rotation was calculated as the average of vector intersections at 0 to 45°, 45 to 90°, and 90° to full flexion. If the average center of rotation was between 16 and 1000 mm of the contact location on the medial side it was considered a medial pivot knee. Knees were also classified as medial (16 to 200 mm on medial side), lateral (16 to 200 mm on lateral side), translating (> 200 mm medially or laterally), and other (< 16 mm on both medial and lateral sides). The new Knee Society Scoring System (KSSO objective score, KSSS satisfaction score, KSSF function score), the EQ-5D™ Health Status Index, and the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Level Score were measured preoperatively and at minimum one-year follow-up (average 20.4 months).INTRODUCTION
METHODS
