Aim: To determine if bonewax will act as a suitable barrier during cementation of bone cavities after curettage of bone tumours.

Method: One mix of methylmethacrylate cement was placed on top of a standard piece of bonewax. A steel thermometer probe was used to measure the temperature of the surface of the cement. The temperature was measured above and below the bonewax.

Results: The surface temperature of the cement was found to be 57°C both above and below the bonewax. The exothermic reaction occurred after the end of the cement working time, thus the bonewax acted as a physical barrier to protrusion of cement before melting away.

Discussion: Bone tumours such as GCT may cause cortical destruction. Standard treatment for many such benign tumours is curettage and cementation¹. This is simplest when there is no cortical defect, other than the cortical window which is created by the surgeon who then curettes the tumour and performs any adjuvant therapy that is indicated. The cavity is then filled with cement, which is applied while still workable and runny to allow complete fill of the cavity. Pressurisation is the norm to interdigitate cement into bone to produce thermal necrosis of residual tumour cells. Problems occur when a cortical defect exists as this will allow the escape of cement into the joint or soft tissues with a detrimental thermal effect on cartilage or soft tissues^2,3. The surface temperature found in this study is consistent with others⁴. A cortical defect will deny effective pressurisation, interdigitation and thermal necrosis of tumour cells. We have used bonewax in such surgery and found it is an effective barrier to cement protrusion during cementation of an incomplete cavity and allows effective pressurisation and interdigitation of cement whilst preventing potentially harmful escape of cement and direct contact with cartilage or soft tissues and thus reduces the risk of immediate thermal necrosis and of later third body joint wear¹, or soft tissue irritation. Furthermore the bonewax disappears and is non-toxic.

Objective: To review of an uncommon deformity arising in four patients.

Method: A clinical and radiological review.

Conclusions: heightened awareness and early treatment with monitoring is required.

We describe four cases of distal radial epiphyseal dysplasia associated with a localised area of cutis aplasia congenita (CAC) over the dorsum of the distal forearm. The cutis aplasia was diagnosed at birth in all cases, but the radial dysplasia was not recognised until presentation to our orthopaedic department between the ages of 5 and 10 years. Radial dysplasia describes a spectrum of osseous, musculotendinous, and neurovascular dysplasias of the pre-axial border of the upper limb, and is the most common form of longitudinal deficiency. Cutis aplasia congenita involves an ulcerated area lacking in normal skin formation, present at birth. The most common site is on the scalp, but it has been described on the extremities, and overlying embryological malformations. This association, the long-term implications and the requirement for follow-up until skeletal maturity have not previously been described. We emphasise the importance of continued monitoring of these patients as the effects of radial dysplasia did not become obvious for several years, and the potential benefit from achieving early skin cover with grafting rather than allowing healing by secondary intention is discussed. It is important to increase awareness of this condition so that early orthopaedic and plastic surgical opinions can be sought, in order to reduce the disabling effect on the underlying radius.

To assess the performance and success of joint sparing limb salvage surgery in high grade malignancy, in terms of function, complications, recurrence and survival, as compared to joint resection.

We report a ten-year experience of twenty patients with high grade malignancies of bone which did not cross the epiphyseal plate. They underwent not only limb salvage surgery but also joint preservation. The aim of this is to preserve function in the joint and to prevent the inevitable wear of prosthetic joints requiring revision surgery. The age range was 4 - 25 years (mean 13. 5). The Diagnoses were 14 Osteosarcomas and 6 Ewings sarcomas. Mean follow up was 49 months. There were 13 femoral & 7 tibial malignancies. 12 underwent complex biological fixation with a combination of reimplanted autoclaved or irradiated bone; vascularised fibular graft; femoral or humeral allograft. In 8 cases custom made hydroxyapatite coated prostheses were used to replace the resected bone. This surgery must clearly be evaluated in the context of recurrence, particularly as this is associated with an increased risk of metastases and death. Analysis of our results to date has not shown a greater rate of complications. We experienced one recurrence, and one death. The custom prostheses group had fewer complications and operations. Functionally these patients report near normal limbs and joints and do not report any limitation of activities.

Joint sparing limb salvage surgery is extremely worthwhile as it produces a significantly better functioning limb and lower morbidity, with less likelihood of revision surgery. We have not found a higher risk of post-operative complications, recurrence or death. Furthermore massive prosthetic replacement is quicker, osseointegrates reliably and is associated with a lower complication and further operation rate.