header advert
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Research

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 99-B, Issue SUPP_8 | Pages 83 - 83
1 Apr 2017
Gindraux F Oudina K Nallet A de Billy B Petite H Obert L
Full Access

Previous clinical studies have shown the efficacy of a foreign body-induced membrane combined with bone autograft for the reconstruction of traumatologic or pathologic large bone defects or, bone non union. This membrane, rich in mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC), avoids bone autograft resorption and promotes consolidation by revascularisation of the bone and secretion of growth factors. Reconstruction requires two different surgical stages: firstly, insertion of a cement spacer in the defect, and secondly, removal of the spacer, preservation of the foreign body-induced membrane and filling of the cavity by bone autograft. The optimal time to perform the second surgical stage remains unclear.

So, we aimed to correlate bone healing and, phenotype and function of cells isolated from the induced membrane, in patients whose second surgery was performed on average after 6 months (i.e. beyond the recommended time of one month). Cell phenotype was determined by flow cytometry and cell function by: alkaline Phosphatase enzyme activity, secretion of calcium and von Kossa staining. Second, using histological and immunohistochemistry studies, we aimed to determine the nature and function of induced membrane over time. Seven patients were included with their consent.

Results showed Treated patients achieved in all cases bone union (except for one patient) and in in vitro and histology and immunohistochemistry gave some indications which need to be completed in the future. First, patient age seemed to be an indicator of bone union speed and recurrent infection, appeared to influence in vitro MSC osteogenic potential and induced membrane structure. Second, we reported, in bone repair situation, the commitment over time in osteogenic lineage of a surprising multipotent tissue (induced membrane) able of vascularisation/ osteogenesis/ chondrogenesis at a precocious time. Finally, best time to perform the second stage (one month) could be easily exceeded since bone union occurred even at very late times.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_11 | Pages 112 - 112
1 Jul 2014
Laurent R Nicod L Layrolle P de Billy B Obert L Gindraux F
Full Access

Summary

Human amniotic membrane has interesting properties for regenerative medicine. To use it as an Advanced Therapeutic Medicinal Product in bone surgery, we are evaluating: the necessity of its osteodifferentiation and the impact on immunogenicity; its optimal condition for storage.

Introduction

The human Amniotic Membrane (hAM) is known to have a good potential to help the regeneration of tissues. It has been used for 100 years in many medical disciplines because of its properties: a flexible scaffold containing stem cells and growth factors, with low immunogenicity and anti-microbial, anti-inflammatory, anti-fibrotic and analgesic properties. Previous published data showed the possibility of in vitro osteodifferentiation of the whole tissue. We aim to use this «boosted membrane» as an Advanced Therapeutic Medicinal Product for bone repair to treat large defects or pseudarthrosis, so, we are studying:

The necessity to osteodifferentiate the tissue and its consequence on the immunogenicity; Its in vivo osteogenic potential; The effects of the cryopreservation on cell viability and function.