To evaluate the correlation between the clinical Kirk Watson test and arthroscopic Geissler classification in scapholunate instability. All patients undergoing wrist arthroscopy between April 2006 and April 2010 were evaluated. Patients were included in the study if they had a Kirk Watson test and a wrist arthroscopy with an assessment of the stability of the scapholunate joint using the Geissler classification. Patients who had a Kirk Watson test performed with subsequent normal scapholunate joint at arthroscopy were included as a control group. Geissler grades 1 and 2 and grades 3 and 4 were grouped for further analysis into low and high grade instability groups respectively.Aim
Methods
More than 60% of patients presenting with a hip fracture have significant medical co-morbidities and a one year mortality rate between 14% and 47%. The rating scale for the American Society of Anaesthetists (ASA) is a reliable predictor of both surgical risk and mortality with ASA 4 patients having 100% mortality at one year.1,2 Our aim was to establish a mortality rate for fractured neck of femur patients at three months and twelve months, and to ascertain the mortality of patients with an ASA 4 grading. Ultimately, should we be operating on this high risk cohort of patients'. We also chose to analyse our current practice in the management of displaced intracapsular neck of femur fractures in patients 90 years of age and over.Introduction
Aims
The concept of the golden patient (GP) was introduced to our busy teaching district general hospital, in April 2009, to improve trauma theatre start times following disappointing results from a previous in-hospital study. The GP is a pre-selected first patient on the following day trauma list who is medically fit with a clear surgical plan. The GP should have already been seen by an anaesthetist and be ready to be sent for by theatres early. It has been shown by others to improve operation start times and could be used to improve trauma services and meet clinical targets more readily. This prospective study involved the collection of planned trauma lists with the designated GP over November and December 2009. Data was collected from the theatre logbooks, including patient demographics, theatre reception, anaesthetic and operation start times. This was compared with the pre-GP data (January and February 2009). Graphs showing the comparative mean start times between pre-GP and GP trauma lists, including the 95% confidence interval for the population mean were created. A two sample T test was used to evaluate significance between groups.Introduction
Methods
