This study aimed to overcome the subjective nature of routine assessment of knee laxity and develop a repeatable, objective method using a hand-held force application device (FAD).

Eighteen clinicians (physiotherapists, consultants, trainees) volunteered to measure the coronal angular deviation of the right knee of a healthy volunteer using a validated non-invasive infrared measuring system. Effort was taken to ensure the knee flexion angle (∼2°) and hand positions were constant during testing. Three varus and valgus stress tests were conducted, in which maximum angular deviation was determined and subsequently averaged, in the following order of conditions: manual stress without the FAD up to a perceived end-point (before); with the FAD to apply a moment of 18 Nm; and again without the FAD (after). A repeated measures ANOVA was used to analyse the results.

All three groups of clinicians produced measurements of valgus laxity with consistent mean values and standard deviations (<1°) for each condition. For varus mean values were consistent but standard deviations were larger.

Valgus deviations varied significantly between conditions (p < 0.01), with deviations achieved using the FAD greater than both before (p < 0.01) and after (p < 0.05) indicating that the perceived endpoints were less than that achieved at 18 Nm. However varus perceived endpoints were no different to that achieved at 18 Nm, suggesting that clinicians usually apply a greater valgus moment than varus. Furthermore, the non-significant increase in valgus deviation between before and after (p = 0.123) is suggestive of a training trend, especially for trainees.

Our standardised knee laxity assessment may have a role in improving the balancing techniques of TKA and the diagnosis of collateral ligament injuries. Also, by quantifying the technique of senior clinicians, and with use of the FAD, the perceptive skills of more junior trainees may be enhanced.