In total joint replacement devices, material loss from the taper junctions is a clinical concern. Previous studies of explanted orthopedic devices have relied on visual scoring methods to quantify the fretting-corrosion damage on the component interfaces. Previous research has shown that visual fretting-corrosion evaluation is correlated to the volume of material loss [1], but scoring is semi-qualitative and does not provide a quantitative measure of the amount of material removed from the surface. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a quantitative method for measuring the volume of material lost from the surfaces of explanted devices at the taper-trunnion junction. 10 new exemplar taper adapter sleeves (Ceramtec, Plochingen, Germany) were used for method validation. By using exemplar devices we were able to create clinically realistic taper damage in a controlled and repeatable manner using machining tools. Taper surfaces were measured before and after in vitro material removal using a roundness machine (Talyrond 585, Taylor Hobson, UK). Axial traces were measured on each taper surface using a diamond stylus. The mass of artificially removed material was also measured gravimetrically using a microgram balance (Sartorius, CPA225D, accuracy = ± 0.00003g). Surface profiles were analyzed using a custom MatLab script and Talymap software was used to provide 3D visualizations of the pattern of material loss. Calculated volumetric material loss was compared to the gravimetric value. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to determine the optimum number of traces to characterize the material loss from taper junctions.Introduction
Methods
Recent implant design trends have renewed concerns regarding metal wear debris release from modular connections in THA. Previous studies regarding modular head-neck taper corrosion were largely based on cobalt chrome (CoCr) alloy femoral heads. Comparatively little is known about head-neck taper corrosion with ceramic femoral heads or about how taper angle clearance influences taper corrosion. This study addressed the following research questions: 1) Could ceramic heads mitigate electrochemical processes of taper corrosion compared to CoCr heads? 2) Which factors influence stem taper corrosion with ceramic heads? 3) What is the influence of taper angle clearance on taper corrosion in THA? 100 femoral head-stem pairs were analyzed for evidence of fretting and corrosion. A matched cohort design was employed in which 50 ceramic head-stem pairs were matched with 50 CoCr head-stem pairs based on implantation time, lateral offset, stem design and flexural rigidity. Fretting corrosion was assessed using a semi-quantitative scoring scale where a score of 1 was given for little to no damage and a score of 4 was given for severe fretting corrosion. The head and trunnion taper angles were measured using a roundness machine (Talyrond 585, Taylor Hobson, UK). Taper angle clearance is defined as the difference between the head and trunnion taper angles.Introduction
Methods
