header advert
Results 1 - 1 of 1
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 90-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 532 - 532
1 Aug 2008
Lankester BJA Sabri O Gheduzzi S Stoney JD Miles AW Bannister GC
Full Access

Introduction: Inadequate cementation of the acetabular component in hip replacement surgery leads to early aseptic loosening, the most common cause of revision. The optimum method of cementation has not been fully evaluated. This study aimed to determine the effect of the acetabular component flange on mean and peak pressure during component insertion.

Method: A 53mm deepened hemisphere was machined from aluminium. Pressure transducers were positioned at the rim, at 45 degrees, and at the base. Polyethelene acetabular components of different sizes and flange designs were mounted onto a materials testing machine and inserted at a constant rate into Palacos R cement within the aluminium hemisphere. Insertion was stopped at a pre-determined point when an even cement mantle was achieved. The same components were then tested without a flange. Each test was repeated six times. Output data from the transducers was analysed.

Results: Components with a flange create a mean pressure 6–18 times higher at the rim than those without a flange. At the base pressures are 2–4 times higher. A stiffer flange generates higher peak and mean pressures than a more malleable flange. Delaying insertion by one minute does not increase the pressures achieved unless a flange is used.

Discussion: These results strongly support the use of a flange to contain cement during insertion of the acetabular component. Unflanged components fail to achieve satisfactory mean or peak pressures, even if insertion is delayed. This is likely to result in poor cement penetration into bone and reduced longevity of interface fixation.