Less invasive single-rod fusion technique may be indicated in the management of NMS to minimise operative time, blood loss and wound-related complications. This retrospective 12-year cohort study (2008–2020) aims to evaluate and compare the outcomes of this technique to the current standard dual rod technique to determine their safety and efficacy.

28 patients in the single rod group (Mean age = 16.4 [SD ±4.0]) and 30 in the double rod group (Mean age = 16.3 [SD±3.5]). Indications included a minimum 2 year follow period, detailed information on the type of implant and a complete pre- and post-operative imaging and medical records. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, and surgical characteristics were collected. Outcomes assessed included the immediate post-op and final follow up angles and general complications. All outcome analysis was performed using a regression approach.

Angles at final follow-up: lumbar (Difference ratio (DR)= 2.60 [95% CI 0.37 – 18.4], p=0.25), thoracic (DR= 1.08 [95% CI 0.19 – 6.28], p=0.92), thoracolumbar (major curve angle) (DR 1.35 [95% CI 0.60 – 3.06], p=0.46) and kyphosis (DR = 0.97 [0.66, 1.42] p=0.86). There was no statistically significant difference, between the two groups, for any of the above angle outcomes as well as for length of surgery, blood loss and complication outcomes.

Both single and double rod instrumentation achieves satisfactory and safe deformity correction which is maintained at final follow up. A larger scale study is warranted to further assess these techniques while also conducting a cost-benefit analysis between them.

To date, there are no clear guidelines from the National Institute of Clinical Excellence or the British Orthopaedic Association regarding the use of Autologous Blood Transfusion (ABT) drains after elective primary Total Knee Replacement (TKR). There is little evidence to comparing specifically the use of ABT drains versus no drain. The majority of local practice is based on current evidence and personal surgical experience.

We aim to assess whether the use of ABT drains effects the haemoglobin level at day 1 post-operation and thus alter the requirement for allogenic blood transfusion. In addition we aim to establish whether ABT drains reduce post-operative infection risk and length of hospital stay.

Forty-two patients undergoing elective primary TKR in West London between September 2011 and December 2011 were evaluated pre- and post-operatively. Patient records were scrutinised. The patient population was divided into those who received no drain post-operatively and those with an ABT drain where fluid was suctioned out of the knee in a closed system, filtered in a separate compartment and re-transfused into the patient.

Twenty-six patients had ABT drains and 4 (15.4%) required an allogenic blood transfusion post-operatively. Sixteen patients received no drain and 5 (31.3%) required allogenic blood. There was no statistical difference between these two groups (p=0.22). There was no statistical difference (p=0.75) in the average day 1 haemoglobin drop between the ABT drain and no drain groups with haemoglobin drops of 2.80 and 2.91 respectively. There was no statistical difference in the length of hospital stay between the 2 groups (p=0.35). There was no statistical difference (p=0.26) in infection rates between the 2 groups (2 in ABT drains Vs. 0 in no drains). Of the 2 patients who experienced complications one had cellulitis and the other had an infected haematoma, which was subsequently washed out.

The results identify little benefit in using ABT drains to reduce the requirement for allogenic blood transfusion in the post-operative period following TKR. However, due to small patient numbers transfusion rates of 31.3% in the ABT drain group Vs. 15.4% in the no drain group cannot be ignored. Therefore further studies including larger patient numbers with power calculations are required before a true observation can be identified.

Aim

A new multidisciplinary hip fracture pathway, based on national BOA and NICE guidance, was introduced in our institution to facilitate rapid preoperative medical optimisation and early surgery for patients with hip fractures. The aim of this audit was to assess its impact on patient care and outcomes.