Patients requiring lower limb reconstruction have often undergone significant trauma. In some patients this is a consequence of self-harm, others develop depression as a result of the accidental trauma that caused their injury. Little is known of the extent of the problem and how it changes over the course of their treatment. Patients undergoing limb reconstruction in a major trauma centre were asked to complete an online questionnaire on the day of surgery. This included a Zung self-rating depression score, LEFS and EQ5D. They were asked to complete these again at subsequent post-operative time points.Background
Design and Methods
The Exogen Ultrasound Device is licensed for fracture non-union under NICE guideline MTG-12. Reimbursement is offered if there is no fracture union after 250 days of treatment as per manufacturer guidelines. Quoted healing rates vary between 62% and 100%: we compare our results to these. A retrospective audit of all patients who received Exogen for long bone non-union was undertaken. The indication, duration of treatment, fracture outcome and compliance with the recommended treatment pathway were recorded.Background:
Method:
Little is known about the forces carried by the Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) hexapod fixator. Our aim was to measure the TSF resultant force and how this changed during the consolidation phase. Five patients undergoing correction of tibial deformities were recruited. Measurements were taken at 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks post-correction during various activities. Instrumented struts incorporating strain gauges measuring axial force were temporarily used each time. Strut forces and lengths were used to determine frame kinetics. The resultant axial fixator forces and moments were calculated relative to sitting. Ground reaction forces (GRF) were measured using the treadmill force plates.Background:
Method:
External fixators are not as well tolerated around the femur when compared to the tibia. Lengthening with an intramedullary device is therefore attractive. We reviewed all cases of femoral lengthening performed at our unit from 2007 to 2014. Cases of non-unions, concurrent deformities, congenital limb deficiencies and lengthening with an unstable hip were excluded. This left 33 cases for review. Healing index, implant tolerance and complications were compared.Background:
Method:
Leg length discrepancy related to absence of the femoral head with proximal migration of the femur presents a treatment dilemma. Late sequelae of neonatal hip sepsis and chronic hip dislocation due to developmental dysplasia are the most common causes. Traditional teaching dictates that the hip is stabilised prior to limb lengthening. Reconstructive options alter the shape of the proximal femur which complicates future surgery. We retrospectively reviewed 3 cases of femoral lengthening with an ‘unstable’ hip without prior stabilization. The aetiology was neonatal hip sepsis in 2 cases and chronic hip dislocation due to developmental dysplasia in 1 case. Lengthening was performed with the use of a retrograde Precice lengthening nail.Background:
Methods:
