header advert
Results 1 - 8 of 8
Results per page:
Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 5, Issue 6 | Pages 464 - 478
3 Jun 2024
Boon A Barnett E Culliford L Evans R Frost J Hansen-Kaku Z Hollingworth W Johnson E Judge A Marques EMR Metcalfe A Navvuga P Petrie MJ Pike K Wylde V Whitehouse MR Blom AW Matharu GS

Aims

During total knee replacement (TKR), surgeons can choose whether or not to resurface the patella, with advantages and disadvantages of each approach. Recently, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommended always resurfacing the patella, rather than never doing so. NICE found insufficient evidence on selective resurfacing (surgeon’s decision based on intraoperative findings and symptoms) to make recommendations. If effective, selective resurfacing could result in optimal individualized patient care. This protocol describes a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of primary TKR with always patellar resurfacing compared to selective patellar resurfacing.

Methods

The PAtellar Resurfacing Trial (PART) is a patient- and assessor-blinded multicentre, pragmatic parallel two-arm randomized superiority trial of adults undergoing elective primary TKR for primary osteoarthritis at NHS hospitals in England, with an embedded internal pilot phase (ISRCTN 33276681). Participants will be randomly allocated intraoperatively on a 1:1 basis (stratified by centre and implant type (cruciate-retaining vs cruciate-sacrificing)) to always resurface or selectively resurface the patella, once the surgeon has confirmed sufficient patellar thickness for resurfacing and that constrained implants are not required. The primary analysis will compare the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) one year after surgery. Secondary outcomes include patient-reported outcome measures at three months, six months, and one year (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, OKS, EuroQol five-dimension five-level questionnaire, patient satisfaction, postoperative complications, need for further surgery, resource use, and costs). Cost-effectiveness will be measured for the lifetime of the patient. Overall, 530 patients will be recruited to obtain 90% power to detect a four-point difference in OKS between the groups one year after surgery, assuming up to 40% resurfacing in the selective group.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 100-B, Issue SUPP_12 | Pages 46 - 46
1 Oct 2018
Pandit HG Mouchti S Matharu GS Delmestri A Murray DW Judge A
Full Access

Introduction

Although we know that smoking damages health, we do not know impact of smoking on a patient's outcome following primary knee arthroplasty (KA). In the UK, clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) have the authority (& funds) to commission healthcare services for their communities. Over the past decade, an increasing number of CCGs are using smoking as a contraindication for patients with end-stage symptomatic knee arthritis being referred to a specialist for due consideration of KA without any clear evidence of the associated risks & benefits.

The overall objective of this study is to compare clinical outcomes after knee arthroplasty surgery in smokers, ex-smokers & non-smokers.

Methods

We obtained data from the UK Clinical Research Practice Datalink (CPRD) that contains information on over 11 million patients (7% of the UK population) registered at over 600 general practices. CPRD data was linked to Hospital Episode Statistics, hospital admissions & Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) data. We collected data on all KAs (n=64,071) performed over a 21-year period (1995 to 2016).

Outcomes assessed included: local & systemic complications (at 6-months post-surgery): infections (wound, respiratory, urinary), heart attack, stroke & transient ischaemic attack, venous thromboembolism, hospital readmissions & GP visits (1-year), analgesic use (1-year), surgical revision (up to 20-years), mortality (90-days and 1-year), & 6-month change from pre-operative scores in Oxford Knee Score (OKS).

Regression modelling is used to describe the association of smoking on outcomes, adjusting for confounding factors.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 99-B, Issue 8 | Pages 1020 - 1027
1 Aug 2017
Matharu GS Judge A Pandit HG Murray DW

Aims

To determine the outcomes following revision surgery of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties (MoMHA) performed for adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD), and to identify factors predictive of re-revision.

Patients and Methods

We performed a retrospective observational study using National Joint Registry (NJR) data on 2535 MoMHAs undergoing revision surgery for ARMD between 2008 and 2014. The outcomes studied following revision were intra-operative complications, mortality and re-revision surgery. Predictors of re-revision were identified using competing-risk regression modelling.


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 6, Issue 7 | Pages 405 - 413
1 Jul 2017
Matharu GS Judge A Murray DW Pandit HG

Objectives

Few studies have assessed outcomes following non-metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty (non-MoMHA) revision surgery performed for adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD). We assessed outcomes following non-MoMHA revision surgery performed for ARMD, and identified predictors of re-revision.

Methods

We performed a retrospective observational study using data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. All non-MoMHAs undergoing revision surgery for ARMD between 2008 and 2014 were included (185 hips in 185 patients). Outcome measures following ARMD revision were intra-operative complications, mortality and re-revision surgery. Predictors of re-revision were identified using Cox regression.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 99-B, Issue 5 | Pages 592 - 600
1 May 2017
Matharu GS Nandra RS Berryman F Judge A Pynsent PB Dunlop DJ

Aims

To determine ten-year failure rates following 36 mm metal-on-metal (MoM) Pinnacle total hip arthroplasty (THA), and identify predictors of failure.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively assessed a single-centre cohort of 569 primary 36 mm MoM Pinnacle THAs (all Corail stems) followed up since 2012 according to Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulation Agency recommendations. All-cause failure rates (all-cause revision, and non-revised cross-sectional imaging failures) were calculated, with predictors for failure identified using multivariable Cox regression.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 98-B, Issue 11 | Pages 1455 - 1462
1 Nov 2016
Matharu GS Berryman F Brash L Pynsent PB Dunlop DJ Treacy RBC

Aims

We investigated whether blood metal ion levels could effectively identify patients with bilateral Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) implants who have adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD).

Patients and Methods

Metal ion levels in whole blood were measured in 185 patients with bilateral BHRs. Patients were divided into those with ARMD who either had undergone a revision for ARMD or had ARMD on imaging (n = 30), and those without ARMD (n = 155). Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to determine the optimal thresholds of blood metal ion levels for identifying patients with ARMD.


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 5, Issue 2 | Pages 52 - 60
1 Feb 2016
Revell PA Matharu GS Mittal S Pynsent PB Buckley CD Revell MP

Objectives

T-cells are considered to play an important role in the inflammatory response causing arthroplasty failure. The study objectives were to investigate the composition and distribution of CD4+ T-cell phenotypes in the peripheral blood (PB) and synovial fluid (SF) of patients undergoing revision surgery for failed metal-on-metal (MoM) and metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) hip arthroplasties, and in patients awaiting total hip arthroplasty.

Methods

In this prospective case-control study, PB and SF were obtained from 22 patients (23 hips) undergoing revision of MoM (n = 14) and MoP (n = 9) hip arthroplasties, with eight controls provided from primary hip osteoarthritis cases awaiting arthroplasty. Lymphocyte subtypes in samples were analysed using flow cytometry.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 92-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 420 - 420
1 Jul 2010
Matharu GS Pynsent PB
Full Access

Study Objective: To determine the proportion of patients proceeding to elective total knee arthroplasty with pre-operative anaemia.

Background: Over 60,000 primary total knee replacements are performed in England and Wales each year. Blood transfusion can be associated with serious complications. A pre-operative haemoglobin of less than 12 g/dl increases the likelihood of blood transfusion in the peri-operative period by threefold [1]. Published BOA guidelines recommend patients with pre-operative haemoglobins of 12 g/dl or below in males or 11 g/dl or below in females should have their anaemia investigated and treated prior to total knee arthroplasty.

Methods: Patients having elective total knee arthroplasty at our hospital over three-months formed the study population. Data were collected on age, sex, pre- and postoperative haemoglobin, transfusion requirements in the peri-operative period, and whether the patient had inflammatory arthritis. Patients were classified according to the recommended BOA guidelines for deferring elective surgery using pre-operative haemoglobin levels. Post-operative haemoglobin drop was also calculated.

Results: Fifteen patients (7%) out of 212 had pre-operative haemoglobins below guideline thresholds. The age range of these patients was 59–84 yr. Nine patients were female. Pre-operative haemoglobin ranged from 9.2–12.0 g/dl. Post-operative haemoglobin drop ranged from 0.5–4.3 g/dl. Six patients received blood transfusion in the peri-operative period (maximum of three units). One patient had a diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis.

Discussion: Pre-operative anaemia is common in patients having elective total knee arthroplasty. In this study most anaemic patients did not have anaemias attributable to inflammatory arthritis. Using cell salvage techniques did not prevent peri-operative blood transfusion in anaemic patients.

Conclusion: Anaemic patients wanting arthroplasty in favour of surgical deferral and treatment of their anaemia must be made fully aware of the serious complications associated with blood transfusions.