Range of Motion (ROM) assessments are routinely used during joint replacement to evaluate joint stability before, during and after surgery to ensure the effective restoration of patient biomechanics. This study aimed to quantify axial torque in the femur during ROM assessment in total hip arthroplasty to define performance criteria against which hip instruments can be verified. Longer term, this information may provide the ability to quantitatively assess joint stability, extending to quantitation of bone preparation and quality. Joint loads measured with strain-gaged instruments in five cadaveric femurs prepared using posterior approach were analysed. Variables such as surgeon-evaluator, trial offset and specimen leg and weight were used to define 13 individual setups and paired with surgeon appraisal of joint tension for each setup. Peak torque loads were then identified for specific motions within the ROM assessment. The largest torque measured in most setups was observed during maximum extension and external rotation of the joint, with a peak torque of 13Nm recorded in a specimen weighing 98kg. The largest torque range (19.4Nm) was also recorded in this specimen. Other motions within the trial reduction showed clear peaks in applied torque but with lower magnitude. Relationships between peak torque, torque range and specimen weight produced an R2 value greater than 0.65. The data indicated that key influencers of torsional loads during ROM were patient weight, joint tension and limb motion. This correlation with patient weight should be further investigated and highlights the need for population representation during cadaveric evaluation. Although this study considered a small sample size, consistent patterns were seen across several users and specimens. Follow-up studies should aim to increase the number of surgeon-evaluators and further vary specimen size and weight. Consideration should also be given to alternative surgical approaches such as the Direct Anterior Approach.
Aseptic loosening is the most common failure mode for Total Elbow Arthroplasty (TEA) and is considered to be associated with accelerated polyethylene bearing wear [1, 2]. This study aimed to evaluate three commercially available implant designs under loads associated with daily living. The hypothesis was that more recent designs (Discovery and Nexel) provide greater articular contact areas resulting in lower polyethylene stresses compared to the Coonrad/Morrey (CM). Motion tracking was performed on a healthy volunteer during elbow flexion at 0, 45, and 90° shoulder abduction because most daily activities occur with some shoulder abduction [3] resulting in varus stress about the elbow. This kinematic data was used in an OpenSim upper extremity musculoskeletal model [4] to estimate muscle and joint reaction loads with 5lb in hand, consistent with the common clinical restrictions following TEA. Computer aided assemblies of the smallest size implants for each system were imported to ANSYS for finite element analysis. Metallic components were treated as rigid and polyethylene components were modeled using a nonlinear elastoplastic constitutive model calibrated to material data. Articular contacts were frictional. Physiologic joint reaction forces and moments quantified in OpenSim were applied and the resulting peak articular contact area and peak bearing von Mises stresses were assessed.INTRODUCTION
METHODS
