This study aimed to verify the accuracy of the DIERS Formetric Scan when assessing vertebral rotation of the apical vertebrae in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (A.I.S) patients, to determine whether the DIERS Formetric Scans can be used instead of or alongside radiographs when assessing A.I.S patients.

Both the radiographs and the DIERS Formetric Scans of 60 Preoperative A.I.S patients. All patients included in our study had predominant thoracic curves using the Lenke classification method, Cobb angle range 33° – 85°. Each radiograph was categorised into groups according to the severity of Nash-Moe rotation score of the apical vertebrae. Three groups were formed Nash-Moe +1 (20 patients), Nash-Moe +2 (27 patients), Nash-Moe +3 (13 patients). Each result was then compared to the maximal rotation analysed by the DIERS Formetric Scan, which took place on the same day as the radiographs. The results were then assessed using a Pearson Correlation Coefficient and a One-Way ANOVA with Post-Hoc Tukey HSD Analysis.

The Nash-Moe +1 Group scored a mean maximal rotation of 14.65° ±6.56 (11.82 – 17.48) (95% Confidence Interval), Nash-Moe +2 mean maximal rotation was 19.6° ±7.1 (16.92 – 22.28) and Nash-Moe +3 scored 21.53° ±8.9 (16.99 – 26.37). The Pearson Correlation Coefficient of this assessment was +0.342 (p value 0.07) demonstrating a weak positive correlation. The One-Way ANOVA analysis with Post-Hoc Tukey HSD analysis. The results of this analysis was an F value score of +4.115 (p Value 0.021) for the overall One-Way ANOVA test. The Post-Hoc Tukey HSD tests demonstrate that there is a statistical difference between Group 1 and Group 3 (p value 0.030) but there is no statistical difference between Group 1 and Group 2 (p value 0.068) as well as no statistical difference between Group 2 and Group 3 (p value 0.716).

DIERS Formetric Scan assessment of vertebral rotation shows a positive correlation with the Nash-Moe method. This allows us to rely on the Formetric scans and thus a possible reduction in radiographs when assessing A.I.S, this reduces the exposure to ionising radiation in A.I.S patients.

Purpose: We report an evolving technique for managing peri-operative pain relief that has enabled early mobilisation and facilitated early discharge after primary Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA).

Methods and Results: Our organisation has instituted a regime covering all aspects of the peri-operative care for TKA. This includes: pre-operative counselling and preparation; multimodal anaesthesia and analgesia regime; intra-articular analgesia for 24 hours post-operation; early mobilisation regime. We carried out an audit of prospectively collected data of all patients undergoing primary TKA in the six months from January to June 2008 (total of 319 patients), including pain scores, discharge from physiotherapy and follow up data at six weeks.

A total of 305 TKAs with complete data sets were included in the analysis. Of these 36% were mobilised on the day of surgery and 93% by post-operative day 1. Catheterisation rates were 12% and the need for postoperative intra-venous fluids was 10%. In-house physiotherapy discharged 58% of patients by day 3 and 85% by day 5. The visual analogue pain scores (on movement) on day zero and day one were within acceptable limits (median = 3) and 80% of patients experienced no nausea or vomiting.

Functionally, the median range of movement at discharge was 85° with 31% of patients requiring out-patient physiotherapy assessment. At six weeks the median range of motion was 95° with only 5% of patients having a reduced range of motion (reduction of > 10°) when compared to discharge. The median Oxford scores improved from 43 pre-operatively to 26 at six weeks.

Conclusion: This regime offers an efficient method for post-operative pain relief and early mobilisation with the added benefit of reducing post-operative catheterisation, intra-venous fluid requirements and the need for post-operative physiotherapy. It compares very favourably with published data on other peri-operative regimes using regional anaesthesia.

Introduction: We report an evolving technique for managing peri-operative pain relief that has enabled early mobilisation and facilitated early discharge after primary Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA).

Methods: Our organisation has instituted a regime covering all aspects of the peri-operative care for THA. This includes: pre-operative counselling and preparation; multimodal anaesthesia and analgesia regime; intra-articular analgesia for 24 hours post-operation; early mobilisation regime. We carried out an audit of prospectively collected data of all patients undergoing primary THA in the six months from January to June 2008 (total of 138 patients), including pain scores, discharge from physiotherapy and follow up data at six weeks.

Results: A total of 122 THAs with complete data sets were included in the analysis. Of these 27% were mobilised on the day of surgery and 97% by post-operative day 1. Catheterisation rates were 16% and the need for post-operative intra-venous fluids was 15%. In-house physiotherapy discharged 58% of patients by day 3 and 87% by day 5. The visual analogue pain scores (on movement) on day zero and day one were within acceptable limits (medians were 2.5 and 2 respectively) and 84% of patients experienced no nausea or vomiting.

Functionally 14% of patients required out-patient physiotherapy assessment. At three months the median Oxford scores had improved from 43 pre-operatively to 20.

Discussion: This regime offers an efficient method for post-operative pain relief and early mobilisation with the added benefit of reducing post-operative catheterisation, intra-venous fluid requirements and the need for post-operative physiotherapy. It compares very favourably with published data on other peri-operative regimes using regional anaesthesia.

Background: To assess the potential for Quantec imaging to save radiographs in the follow-up of patients with early onset scoliosis. This is a group of patients who often have many radiographs due their age at diagnosis.

Methods: This is a prospective cohort study. Twenty-four children with early onset scoliosis are identified. They all have a minimum of three simultaneous radiographs and Quantec scans as part of routine follow up for their scoliosis curves. There are 15 males and 9 females (22 thoracic, 1 thoracolumbar, 1 lumbar). Mean age at diagnosis is 3 years (range 1–4.8 years). The Cobb angle of the major curve is measured from each radiograph and compared with the Q-angle using Bland-Altman plots and linear regression analysis.

Results: The mean Cobb angle was 30° and the mean Q-angle 19°. The correlation coefficient was 0.68 (p< 0.05). In curves with Cobb angle < 30°, The Bland-Altman plots show a close scatter with a mean difference of 3.4°. It was calculated that this could have safely saved 18 radiographs in 14 patients. In curves > 30°, there was a large scatter and a mean difference between Cobb angle and Q-angle of 20.1°.

Conclusion: In early onset scoliosis, curves with Cobb angle less than 30° can be safely followed clinically and with the Q-scan reducing the number of radiographs required. Curves with Cobb angle greater than 30° cannot be reliably observed with Quantec scans alone.