A staging system has been developed to revise the 1994 ARCO classification for ONFH. The final consensus resulted in the following 4-staged system: stage I—X-ray is normal, but either magnetic resonance imaging or bone scan is positive; stage II—X-ray is abnormal (subtle signs of osteosclerosis, focal osteoporosis, or cystic change in the femoral head) but without any evidence of subchondral fracture, fracture in the necrotic portion, or flattening of the femoral head; stage III—fracture in the subchondral or necrotic zone as seen on X-ray or computed tomography scans. This stage is further divided into stage IIIA (early, femoral head depression ≤2 mm) and stage IIIB (late, femoral head depression >2 mm); and stage IV—X-ray evidence of osteoarthritis with accompanying joint space narrowing, acetabular changes, and/or joint destruction. Radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography (CT) scans may all be involved in diagnosing ONFH; however, the optimal diagnostic modality remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to identify: 1) how ONFH is diagnosed at a single academic medical center, and 2) if CT is a necessary modality for diagnosing/staging OFNH. The EMR was queried for the diagnosis of ONFH between 1/1/2008–12/31/2018 at a single academic medical center. CT and MRI scans were reviewed by the senior author and other contributors. The timing and staging quality of the diagnosis of ONFH were compared between MRI and CT to determine if CT was a necessary component of the ONFH work-up.Introduction
Methods
Without intervention 80% of hips with osteonecrosis (ON) will progress. Core decompression has shown favorable results (60–80% survivorship) in early stage ON, and recently, bone marrow aspirate concentration (BMAC) injection into the decompressed femoral head has been proposed to stimulate healing of the necrotic lesion and improve outcomes and survivorship. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and radiographic outcomes of 42 hips in 26 patients who underwent core decompression with BMAC for ON with a minimum of 1 year follow up. We evaluated pre-op visual analog pain scores (VAS), Steinberg class based on radiographs, as well as Kerboul angle as measured on MRI. Clinical outcomes were reported as change in VAS at final follow up, advancement in Steinberg classification based on radiographs at final follow up, or decision to proceed with THA.Introduction
Methods
Narcotic administration within the inpatient setting is highly variable any may benefit from the implementation of standardized multi-modal pain management protocols. Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) candidates have historically received high doses of opioids within the perioperative period for the management of surgical pain. Healthcare systems have responded by improving opioid prescribing documentation and implementing narcotic-sparing pain protocols into TJA integrate care pathways (ICP). Despite these efforts, there are few technological platforms designed to curtail excessive inpatient narcotic administration. Here we present an early iteration of an inpatient narcotic administration reporting tool which normalizes patient narcotic consumption as an average daily morphine milligram equivalence (MME) per surgical encounter (MME/day/encounter) among total hip arthroplasty (THA) recipients. This information may help orthopaedic surgeons visualize their individual granular inpatient narcotic prescribing habits individually and compared to other surgeons, while taking into consideration patient and procedure specific variables.Summary
Introduction
There has been a renewed interest in the surgical approach used for total hip arthroplasty (THA). Risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) have been well studied over the past decade, yet PJI remains one of the most devastating complications following THA. We studied the impact of direct anterior (DA) versus non-direct anterior (NA) surgical approaches on PJI, and examined the impact of new perioperative protocols on PJI rates following all surgical approaches at a single institution. 6086 continuous patients undergoing primary THA at a single institution from 2013–2016 were retrospectively evaluated. Data obtained from electronic patient medical records included age, sex, body mass index (BMI), medical comorbidities, surgical approach, and presence of deep PJI. Deep PJI was defined according to National Healthcare Safety Network's (NHSN) criteria for joint space infection following prosthetic hip replacement. Infection rates were calculated yearly for the DA and NA approach groups. Covariates were assessed and used in multivariate analysis to calculate adjusted odds ratios for risk of development of PJI with DA compared to NA approaches. In order to determine the effect of adopting a set of infection prevention protocols and patient optimization on PJI, we calculated odds ratios for PJI comparing patients undergoing THA for two distinct time periods: 2013–2014 and 2015–2016. These periods corresponded to before and after we implemented a set of perioperative infection protocols.Introduction
Methods
