To determine the efficacy and safety of the Magec system in early onset scoliosis (EOS). In 2011, 6 males and 2 females had Magec rods, with an average age of 8.5 years (2.9–12.7 years), 7 patients had dual rods, and 1 had single. The main cause of EOS was idiopathic scoliosis (n=6), followed by Congenital (n=1), and Syndromic (n=1). Average follow up was 19.4 months (14–26 months). 4 of these patients had their previous Paediatric Isola growing rods exchanged to Magec, and 1 patient had an exchange from single to Dual Magec rods.Aim:
Methods:
To measure truncal parameters for patients treated with growing rod systems for early onset scoliosis (EOS). 44 patients underwent growth rod surgery for EOS between 1999 and 2013 (24 females and 20 males). 27 patients had idiopathic scoliosis, 13 congenital, 3 syndromic and 1 neuromuscular. 26 patients had Paediatric Isola, 8 had Paediatric Expedium, 4 had dual growth rods with domino's and 9 each had VEPTR and MAGEC rods systems. Medical records and radiographs were analysed. Cobb angle, T1-T12 and T1-S1 length, coronal and sagittal balance, apical vertical translation (AVT), space available for the lung (SAL) and shoulder balance were measured.Aim:
Methods:
Retrospective review of growth sparing spinal instrumentation. Medical records of 30 children with spinal deformity treated were evaluated. There were 14 male and 16 female patients at an average age of 4.9 years (1-14) at the time of presentation. These included 18 idiopathic, 11 congenital and a 14 year old with delayed growth having GH treatment. All patients underwent dual growing rod construct using hook and pedicle screw instrumentation. Extensions were carried out at approximately 6 monthly intervals. Average follow up was 4.2 years (2-8.5) with an average of 7.3(3-15) extension/exchange procedures per patient. Average immediate postoperative Cobb angle was 29(15-55) from a preoperative Cobb of 68(55-100) and this was maintained to a final mean Cobb angle of 30(15-60). Average gain in T1-S1 length was 5.7(3.5-9.8) cm. Five patients had final fusion at an average age of 15.5 years. There were no infections following primary operation. Out of 249 procedures including extensions/exchange, there were 9(4.5%) episodes of deep infection in 7 patients requiring debridement. Four patients (13%) had revisions for rod breakage/screw loosening/hook pullout/junctional kyphosis and three(10%) had prominent implants.Purpose
Methods and results
To evaluate efficacy of blood conservation strategies on transfusion requirements in adult scoliosis surgery and establish a protocol for cross matching. Retrospective review of 50 consecutive adult scoliosis patients treated using anterior only(14,28%), posterior only(19,38%) or combined(17,34%) approaches. All patients were anaesthetised by the same anaesthetist implementing a standard protocol using cell salvage, controlled hypotension and antifibrinolytics. Mean age was 24.6 years. BMI was 21.9. On an average 9.5(6-15) levels were fused, with an average duration of surgery of 284.6(130-550) minutes. Antifibrinolytics were used in 31(62%) of the patients which included Aprotinin in 21(42%) and Tranexamic acid in 10(20%). Patients on antifibrinolytics had a significantly (p<0.05) lower blood loss (530ml) as compared to other patients (672ml). Mean volume of the cell saved blood re-transfused was 693.8 ml and mean postoperative HB level dropped to 10.7 g/dl(7.7-15) from a mean preoperative of 13.3 g/dl(10-17). 7(42%) with combined approaches and 3(15.8%) with posterior only approach required blood transfusion, 4/50(8%) of which required intra while 6/50(12%) required intra and postoperative transfusion. None of the patients having anterior surgery alone required blood transfusion.Purpose
Methods and Results
Spinal cord injury following trauma is initially dealt with by acute hospitals. The early management including stabilization is usually performed by these centres. This is followed by onward referral to one of the Regional Spinal Injury Units. There is concern of both sides of the fence regarding mobilization following spinal cord injury. The acute hospitals want to avoid the problems of prolonged recumbency and the Regional Spinal Injury Units wish to avoid the problems of early aggressive mobilization. Therefore, we set out to discover if there was a standard approach to mobilising these patients following surgical stabilization, because of the oversubscribed resources of the spinal injury units and the wish to start mobilizing the injured as soon as possible. A comparative audit of the Regional Spinal Injury Units in the UK and North American Units. Regional Spinal Injury Units in United Kingdom and North America Clear Management Plan Mobilisation Schedule We had replies from all Regional Spinal Injury Units in the UK and from seven in North America. The Regional Spinal Injury Units all had differing approaches. Only a few were able to convey a clear management plan and mobilization schedule. Whereas the North American Units provided a ‘mobilize as able’ plan in all cases. The North American Units had a ‘mobilize as able’ policy, whereas the UK units had a mixed approach. A coherent collaboration between the spinal surgeons stabilizing these injuries and the spinal injury units providing rehabilitation would improve patient management.
