Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 101-B, Issue SUPP_14 | Pages 14 - 14
1 Dec 2019
Nurmohamed F van Dijk B Veltman ES Hoekstra M Rentenaar RJ Weinans H van der Wal BCH Vogely HC
Full Access

Aim

To retrospectively evaluate infection eradication rate of DAIR procedures performed in our tertiary referral center. We analyzed whether the outcome was influenced by time of infection after arthroplasty, previous surgery or causative pathogen.

Methods

We retrospectively collected data of 81 patients treated with DAIR for periprosthetic joint infections after hip (n=48) and knee (n=33) arthroplasty between 2011 and 2017. Patients were divided into 3 groups: acute early infections (occurring <4 weeks, 29 cases), late chronic infections (occurring >4 weeks postoperative, 49 cases) and acute haematogenous infections (occuring >3 months after surgery with symptoms less than 4 weeks, 3 cases). Primary outcome was successful infection eradication after treatment within one year. Eradication failure was determined as unplanned subsequent surgery because of persistent infection, use of suppressive antibiotics or signs of infection at one year follow-up.


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 4, Issue 12 | Pages 190 - 194
1 Dec 2015
Kleinlugtenbelt YV Hoekstra M Ham SJ Kloen P Haverlag R Simons MP Bhandari M Goslings JC Poolman RW Scholtes VAB

Objectives

Current studies on the additional benefit of using computed tomography (CT) in order to evaluate the surgeons’ agreement on treatment plans for fracture are inconsistent. This inconsistency can be explained by a methodological phenomenon called ‘spectrum bias’, defined as the bias inherent when investigators choose a population lacking therapeutic uncertainty for evaluation. The aim of the study is to determine the influence of spectrum bias on the intra-observer agreement of treatment plans for fractures of the distal radius.

Methods

Four surgeons evaluated 51 patients with displaced fractures of the distal radius at four time points: T1 and T2: conventional radiographs; T3 and T4: radiographs and additional CT scan (radiograph and CT). Choice of treatment plan (operative or non-operative) and therapeutic certainty (five-point scale: very uncertain to very certain) were rated. To determine the influence of spectrum bias, the intra-observer agreement was analysed, using Kappa statistics, for each degree of therapeutic certainty.