It has been reported that some of the local anaesthetic agents possess antimicrobial activity against clinically-significant bacteria. Although bupivacaine exhibits a bacteriostatic effect at concentrations above 0.25% there are concerns that it might interact with some of the other antibiotics administered to patients. Whilst these interactions may be potentially benign, the risk is that they are antagonistic and that local bupivacaine might predispose the patient to a higher risk of infection.

Bupivacaine is commonly administered as a local anaesthetic following knee arthroplasy; the purpose of this study was to assess its potential interactions with gentamicin eluting from the cement used to fix the device.

A strain of Saphylococcus aureus (29213) with established susceptible Minimal Inhibition Concentration (MIC) and Minimal Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) for gentamicin was used. This organism was inoculated into four types of broth; Mueller-Hinton broth (MH), MH with different concentrations of gentamicin, MH with 0.25% and 0.125% bupivacaine and MH with various combinations of gentamicin and bupivacaine. The broths were incubated at 37C and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 6 and 24 hours post inoculation the number of bacteria remaining were counted. From these data kill-curves were generated describing the absolute and individual rates of killing seen with bupivacaine and gentamicin alone and when in combination.

Bupivacaine showed a bacteriostatic effect only at concentrations of 0.25% and higher. All concentrations of gentamicin above or equal to the expected MBC showed bactericidal effect. However, in combination with both strengths of Bupivacaine (0.25 and 0.125%) the bacteriocidal effect of gentamicin was seen at a lower concentration and the rate of killing of bacteria was enhanced.

Bupivacaine has bacteriostatic effect at concentrations above 0.25% in line with published data. In these experiments we have shown that the use of bupivacaine together with gentamicin does not reduce the bactericidal property of the antibiotic and that the bactericidal effect of gentamicin appears to be enhanced by bupivacaine. This would suggest that the local use of bupivacaine is unlikely to increase the risk of infection in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty and may actually be beneficial.

The passage of bacteria through surgical drapes is a potential cause of wound infection. Previous studies have shown that liquids and human albumin penetrate certain types of drapes¹². We studied the passage of bacteria through seven different types of surgical drape and an operating tray. We also studied the effect of different wetting agents on the passage of bacteria through wet reusable woven drapes. Bacteria were grown on an overfilled whole horse blood agar plate. The plate was covered with the drape to be tested and a second agar plate was inverted and placed on the drape. After 30 minutes the second agar plate was removed, incubated and inspected for bacterial growth. The experiment was repeated removing the second plate at 60 minutes and then again at 90 minutes. The entire experiment was repeated for each drape and then for each wetting agent.

Bacteria easily penetrated all the woven reusable fabrics within 30 minutes. The disposable non-woven drapes proved to be impermeable up to 90 minutes, as did the operating tray.

Chlorhexidine and Povidone-Iodine were demonstrated to slow, but not stop the passage of bacteria through reusable woven drapes. Normal saline and human blood accelerated the passage of bacteria through reusable woven drapes. We recommend the use of non-woven disposable drapes or woven drapes with an impermeable operating tray, in all surgical cases.