header advert
Results 1 - 1 of 1
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 85-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 117 - 117
1 Feb 2003
Anderson AJ Graham D Thomas M Patel AD
Full Access

A 5 year review into the workload and subsequent financial implications of pelvic and acetabular reconstruction at a regional tertiary referral centre.

To ascertain the level and means of financial recompense for performing pelvic/acetabular reconstruction on patients from other healthcare trusts at a tertiary referral centre.

The records of all 120 patients who underwent either pelvic or acetabular reconstruction between 1995–2000 were examined. Epidemiological data and information on all possible costs of their stay was accumulated (itemised finance department figures were used).

The individual patient billing system of ECRs (Extra Contractual Referrals) was changed in 1998 and replaced by the OATs system (Out of Area Treatments) whereby an annual lump sum was received based on historic referral patterns. We investigated the financial effects that occurred.

60 out of 120 patients treated, were from other health-care trusts. From 1995–1998, 25 ECR patients were treated at an estimated cost of £480, 000. The trust received £280, 000, a net loss of £200, 000. From 1998–2000, 34 OATS patients were treated at an estimated cost of £650, 000, amounting to a net gain of £1. 15 million pounds.

‘Out of area’ referrals for pelvic and acetabular reconstruction have increased by 50 % in the last 2 years. However the new payment system i. e. OATS has resulted in the tertiary referral centre being generously rewarded, unlike prior to 1998 and the old ECR system. It is therefore recommended that annual review must be carried out to ensure that funding will meet the demand for specialist services in the future and prevent subsidisation of some centres by other trusts.