Introduction: Following intralesional resection of giant cell tumour local recurrence happens in up to 40% depending on type of treatment. Common plain radiography or Magnetic resonance tomography (MRI) often has the problem not to discriminate between scar and recurrent tumour.

Materials and Methods: In 19 patients with giant cell tumour dynamic PET using F18-Fluordeoxyglucose (FDG) for estimation of FDG turnover was carried out. PET was performed before surgery and as follow up. In case of evidence in x-ray or MRI of recurrent giant cell tumour PET was performed again. results of histologic evaluation after reoperation then were compared to results of PET.

Results: All giant cell tumours showed a specific PET pattern with a very high standard uptake value (SUV) of 4.8 in median. In one case pulmonary metastases could be found. In follow up after surgery this value dropped to 0.3. Recurrence was suspected in the follow up in 5 patients by MRI or plain radiography. In all these patients PET could show an elevated SUV above 4.0. In these 5 patients surgery was performed and recurrence could be proven by histology. In one patient MRI was negative but PET showed a SUV of 5.2 indicating re-recurrent tumour which could be demonstrated by histology.

Conclusion: We conclude that PET is a very helpful tool not only in the first line diagnosis of giant cell tumour but also in diagnosis of metastatic disease and especially for detection of recurrent tumour.

Introduction: Periprosthetic infection remains a main complication in arthroplasty. In case of a possible infection the surgeon has to have a concept of treatment which can be individually adjusted.

Materials and Methods: To increase the success of implant retaining surgery VAC Instill therapy combining instillation of an antiseptic solution and VAC therapy was performed in 23 patients with periprosthetic hip infections. 19 patients had an early and 4 a late infection of the arthroplasty. Lavasept was used for irrigation.

Results: Definitive wound closure was possible in all patients following 2.1 VAC exchange operations in average. The follow up was 19 months in average. In five of the 23 patients (22%) there was recurrent infection which made the explantation of the implant necessary. In early infection the success rate was 84%, in late infection 50%.

Conclusion: VAC Instill therapy can be successfully used for salvage of infected endoprosthesis especially in case of early infection. The success rate seems to be higher than irrigation alone or suction drainage.

Following intralesional resection of giant cell tumour local recurrence happens in up to 40% depending on type of treatment. Common plain radiography or Magnetic resonance tomography (MRI) often has the problem not to discriminate between scar and recurrent tumour tissue in the cement-tissue border of lesions treated with cement packing. The value of Positron emission tomography (PET) for diagnosis of tumour and recurrence was investigated in these patients.

In 19 patients with giant cell tumour dynamic PET using F18-Fluordeoxyglucose for estimation of FDG turnover was carried out. PET was performed before surgery and as follow up. In all patients giant cell tumour was treated by curettage followed by burring and cement packing. Giant cell tumour was shown by histology in all patients.

All giant cell tumours showed a specific PET pattern with a very high standard uptake value (SUV) of 4.8 in median. In follow up after surgery this value dropped to 0.3. In one case also pulmonary metastasis could be demonstrated. Recurrence was suspected in the follow up in 5 patients by MRI or plain radiography. In all these patients PET could show an elevated SUV above 4.0. In these 5 patients surgery was performed and recurrence could be proven by histology. In one patient MRI showed signs of recurrence but PET showed a SUV of 1.3. In the revision surgery no tumour could be found. In one patient MRI was negative but PET showed a SUV of 5.2 indicating re-recurrent tumour which could be demonstrated by histology.

We conclude that PET is a very helpful tool not only in the first line diagnosis of giant cell tumour but also in diagnosis of metastatic disease and especially for detection of recurrent tumour.

Following resection of primary malignant bone tumours of the humerus, limb salvage can be performed by vascularized fibula graft for reconstruction of large segmental defects.

In 12 patients with malignant bone tumour of the proximal humerus, tumour was resected and the bone defect reconstructed by vascularized fibula graft. Median age of the patients was 23 years. Median follow up was 114 months.

In 10 patients humeral head had to be resected and was replaced by fibular transplant including head and shaft of the ipsilateral fibula. Humeral head could be left in place in 2 patients. Median length of transplant was 17.2 cm. Radiographic union could be seen after 8 months in median. In 7 patients partial necrosis of the fibular head occurred, in 4 patients fracture of the transplant happened following trauma. In these 4 cases revision surgery was required. Partial necrosis of the head of fibula had no significant influence on shoulder function. One patient died of disease, the others are disease free. Enneking Index was 61% in median at time of last follow up. At donor side 3 cases of transient peroneal palsy could be seen.

We conclude that vascularized fibula graft is a successful surgical procedure for upper limb salvage especially for preservation of joint function also in long term follow up.