Chronic bone infections and infected fractures are often treated with excision of the dead bone and implantation of biomaterials which elute antibiotics. Gentamicin has been a preferred drug for local delivery, but this could induce renal dysfunction due to systemic toxicity. This is a particular concern in patients with pre-existing chronic renal disease treated with new antibiotic carriers which achieve very high peak levels of gentamicin in the first few days after surgery. 163 patients (109 males; average age 51.6 years) with Cierny-Mader Type 3 or 4 chronic osteomyelitis had a single-stage operation with excision of the dead bone, filling of the osseous defect with a calcium sulphate-hydroxyapatite carrier, containing gentamicin and immediate soft tissue closure2. No patient was given systemic gentamicin or other renal toxic antibiotics. Mean carrier volume was 10.9mls (range 1–30mls) and mean gentamicin dosing was 190.75mg (maximum 525mg). Seven patients had pre-existing renal disease (4 diabetic nephropathy, 1 nephrotic syndrome, 1 renal transplant and 1 previous acute kidney injury). Serum creatinine levels were collected pre-operatively and during the first seven days post-operatively. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was calculated using the CKD-epi creatinine equation. Renal function was defined using the Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Staging system.Aim
Method
The treatment of chronic bone infection often involves excision of dead bone and implantation of biomaterials which elute antibiotics. Gentamicin is a preferred drug for local delivery, but its systemic use carries a well-established risk of nephrotoxicity. We aim to establish the risk of renal injury with local delivery in a ceramic carrier. 163 consecutive patients with Cierny-Mader Type 3 or 4 chronic osteomyelitis were treated with a single-stage operation which included filling of the osseous defect with a calcium sulphate-hydroxyapatite carrier containing gentamicin. The mean carrier volume used was 10.9mls, leading to a mean implanted gentamicin dose of 191.3mg (maximum 525mg). Serum creatinine levels were collected pre-operatively and during the first seven days post-operatively. Renal impairment was graded using the Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Staging system, and AKI was assessed using the RIFLE criteria.Introduction
Materials and Methods
Periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) continue to be a diagnostic challenge for orthopedic surgeons. Chronic PJI are sometimes difficult to diagnose and occasionally present in a subclinical fashion with normal CRP/ESR and/or normal joint aspiration. Some institutions advocate for routine use of intraoperative culture swabs at the time of all revision surgeries to definitively rule out infection. The purpose of this study is to determine whether routine intraoperative cultures is an appropriate and cost effective method of diagnosing subclinical chronic PJI in revision joint replacement patients with a low clinical suspicion for infection. We performed a retrospective chart review and identified 33 patients that underwent revision hip or knee replacement from a single surgeon over a five-month period. The AAOS guidelines for preoperative PJI workup were followed. 13 patients were diagnosed preoperatively with infection and excluded from the study. 20 patients underwent revision joint replacement and three separate cultures swabs were taken for each patient to help in determining true-positive cultures. Infectious Disease was consulted for all patients with any positive culture. Culture results were reviewed. At our hospital, the cost billed to insurance for a single culture is $1,458.58. We did not calculate the cost of the consultant fee. Three (15%) of the 20 revision arthroplasty patients had a single positive culture. Infectious Disease consultants diagnosed all three of these positive cultures as contaminants. None of the patients had a true-positive intraoperative culture. The total cost billed by the hospital to obtain these cultures in all 20 patients was $87,514.80 In our study, obtaining a set of three intraoperative cultures for those patients with a negative preoperative infection workup was not only cost prohibitive but did not diagnose a single subclinical infection. Studies to find other more reliable, accurate, and cost effective alternatives to diagnose PJI are warranted. In patients undergoing revision hip or knee arthroplasty with a low preoperative clinical suspicion for infection, it does not seem that routine intraoperative culture swabs are necessary or cost effective method for diagnosing subclinical periprosthetic joint infection.
To assess the accuracy of predicted and actual cut alignment from PMCB versus intra-operative computer navigation. We performed 10 primary TKA cases in which both PMCB and computer navigation were used. Standard imaging was performed to generate the plan and the cutting blocks to perform the case with PMCB. At the start of the case, standard navigation procedure was followed using the Praxim navigation system to register the centre of the femoral head, femoral and tibial surfaces and alignment. The PMCB were applied to the femur and tibia and the navigation cut-registering shim was placed in the slot on the PMCB to record the position and alignment of the proposed cut in the coronal and sagittal planes. The following parameters were compared: overall limb alignment in the coronal plane, distal femoral coronal angle, depth of resection on medial and lateral distal femoral condyle and depth of resection on medial and lateral proximal tibia. Differences in the pre-operative PMCB plan, intra-operative navigation assessment and proposed cuts after application of the blocks intra-operatively were recorded.Aim
Method
