header advert
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Research

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 105-B, Issue SUPP_8 | Pages 4 - 4
11 Apr 2023
Lynch J Perriman D Scarvell J Pickering M Galvin C Smith P
Full Access

Total knee replacement (TKR) design aims to restore normal kinematics with emphasis on flexion range. The survivorship of a TKR is dependent on the kinematics in six-degrees-of-freedom (6-DoF). Stepping up, such as stair ascent is a kinematically demanding activity after TKR. The debate about design choice has not yet been informed by 6-DoF in vivo kinematics. This prospective randomised controlled trial (RCT) compared kneeling kinematics in three TKR designs.

68 participants were randomised to receive either cruciate retaining (CR-FB), rotating platform (CR-RP) or posterior stabilised (PS-FB) prostheses. Image quality was sufficient for 49 of these patients to be included in the final analysis following a minimum 1-year follow-up. Patients completed a step-up task while being imaged using single-plane fluoroscopy. Femoral and tibial computer-aided design (CAD) models for each of the TKR designs were registered to the fluoroscopic images using bespoke software OrthoVis to generate six-degree-of-freedom kinematics. Differences in kinematics between designs were compared as a function of flexion.

There were no differences in terminal extension between the groups. The CR-FB was further posterior and the CR-RP was more externally rotated at terminal extension compared to the other designs. Furthermore, the CR-FB designs was more posteriorly positioned at each flexion angle compared to both other designs. Additionally, the CR-RP design had more external femoral rotation throughout flexion when compared with both fixed bearing designs. However, there were no differences in total rotation for either step-up or down. Visually, it appears there was substantial variability between participants in each group, indicating unique patient-specific movement patterns.

While use of a specific implant design does influence some kinematic parameters, the overall patterns are similar. Furthermore, there is high variability indicating patient-specific kinematic patterns. At a group level, none of these designs appear to provide markedly different step-up kinematic patterns. This is important for patient expectations following surgery. Future work should aim to better understand the unique patient variability.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_11 | Pages 43 - 43
1 Jul 2014
Li R Patel H Perriman D Wang J Smith P
Full Access

Summary Statement

Using the latest Next Generation Sequencing technologies, we have investigated miRNA expression profiles in human trabecular bone from total hip replacement (THR) revision surgery where wear particle associated osteolysis was evident.

Introduction

A major problem in orthopaedic surgery is aseptic loosening of prosthetic implants caused by wear particle associated osteolysis. Wear debris is known to impact on a variety of cellular responses and genes in multiple pathways associated with the development of the periprosthetic osteolysis. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) act as negative regulators of gene expression and the importance of miRNAs in joint pathologies has only recently been addressed. However, miRNA profiles in osteolytic bone are largely unknown. Using the latest Next Generation Sequencing technologies, we have investigated miRNA expression profiles in human trabecular bone sourced from bone discarded during total hip replacement (THR) revision surgery where wear particle associated osteolysis was evident.