Most of the algorithm available today to balance varus knee is based on a surgeon's hands-on experience without full understanding of pathological anatomy of varus knee. The high-resolution MRI allows us to recognize the anatomical details of the posteromedial corner and the changes of the soft tissue associated with the osteoarthritis and varus deformity. We have in this study, reviewed 60 cases of severe varus knee scheduled for TKR and compared it to normal MRI and those MRI were evaluated and read by a musculoskeletal radiologist. We have documented clearly the changes that happens in soft tissue, leading to tight medial compartment. We will also show multiple short intra-operative video confirming that MRI findings. We have retrospectively reviewed the MRI on 60 patients with advanced osteoarthritis varus knee. We also reviewed 20 MRI for a normal knee matched for age. We evaluated the posteromedial complex and MCL in sagittal PD-weighted VISTA to check the alignment of the MCL and posteromedial complex and the associate MCL bowing and deformity that could happen in osteoarthritis knee. We have measured the thickness of the posteromedial complex and the posterior medial bowing of the superficial MCL and the involvement of the posterior oblique ligament in those patients. To measure the posterior bowing of the MCL, a line was drawn through the posterior aspect of both menisci and we measured the distance between the posterior edge of MCL to that line in actual image. To measure the thickness of the posteromedial complex, we measured it at two areas in the posterior medial corner posteriorly at the level of the medial meniscus. Measuring the medial bowing of the MCL was done by a line drawn through the medial edge of the femoral condyle and the tibial condyle at the level of the medial meniscus to the inner aspect of the MCL. The normal distance between the posterior aspects of the MCL to the posterior meniscus line was approximately measured 2 cm. in average.Introduction
Material & method
John Insall described medial release to balance the varus knee; the release he described included releasing the superficial MCL in severe varus cases. However, this release can create instability in the knee. Furthermore, this conventional wisdom does not correct the actual pathology which normally exists at the joint line, and instead it focuses on the distal end of the ligament where there is no pathology. We have established a new protocol consisting of 5 steps to balance the varus knee without releasing the superficial MCL and we tried this algorithm on a series of 115 patients with varus deformity and compared it to the outcome with a similar group that we have performed earlier using the traditional Insall technique. 115 TKR were performed by the same surgeon using Zimmer Persona implant in varus arthritic knees. The deformities ranged from 15 to 35 degrees. First, the bony resection was made using Persona instrumentation as recommended by the manufacturer. The sequential balancing was divided into 5 steps (we will show a short video demonstrating the surgical techniques for each step) as follows:
Step 1: Releasing of deep MCL Step 2: Excising of osteophyte Step 3: Excising of scarred tissue in the posteromedial corner soft phytes Step 4: Excision of the posteromedial capsule in case of flexion contracture Step 5: Releasing the semi-membranous (in gross deformity) We used soft tissue tensioner to balance the medial and lateral gaps. When the gaps are balanced at early step, there was no need to carry on the other steps. We used only primary implant and we did not have to use any constrained implant. We have compared this group with a similar group matched for deformity from previous 2 years where the conventional medial release as described by Insall.Introduction
Material and method
Early complication post total knee replacement reported to be higher in obese patient in general. Also the outcome of cruciate retaining and PS knee has been fully discussed before and there was no major difference in the outcomes for all the patients overall regardless of their weight. However, the purpose of this paper is to find out if the CR knee has superiority over PS knee in terms of clinical and functional outcomes and if early complication postTKR such as fracture and instability is more common in PS implant than in CR knee. This is a retrospective study comparing two groups of obese patients. The first using PS implant and the other using CR implant. These two groups were matched for age, body mass and severity of deformity. At our institution we have been using Persona implant which has the option of using PS insert or a CR. The decision to proceed with CR or PS mainly depends on the availability of the implant and also the ability to well balance the knee in patients. In most patients we try to proceed with CR implant. However, the flow of implant sometime sometimes limit us from using CR or the imbalance in the ligament force us to process with PS implant. We have reviewed a chart of over 200 patients in each group of obese patient they were done within the last three years. All cases had a minimum follow up of 6 months. Those groups were matched for body mass, age and severity of deformity. After matching the groups we documented Knee Society Score (KSS), Knee Society Function Score (KSFS), blood loss, post – operative pain and complications. All surgeries were performed by the same surgeon.Introduction
Materials & Methods
The effect of intra-articular tranexamic acid on blood loss in concurrent bilateral total knee arthroplasty was studied in 60 patients in double blind fashion; one knee receiving tranexamic acid, the other knee receiving physiological saline acting as control. A single surgeon performed all operations utilising the same surgical technique and prosthesis. Mean blood loss from intra-articular drains was not significantly different, being 141ml in the tranexamic acid group and 163ml in the control group. Circumferential leg measurements at levels above, through and below the knees were not significantly different between groups on day two post-operatively compared to pre-operatively. Intra-articular tranexamic acid instillation did not lead to a significant reduction in blood loss in these patients.
Tibial component malrotation is one of the commonest causes of pain and stiffness following total knee arthroplasties, however, the assessment of tibial component malrotation on imaging is not a clear-cut. The objective of this study was to assess tibial component rotation in cases with pain following total knee replacement using MRI with metal artifact reduction technique.Introduction
Aim
