In patients with bilateral unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis, simultaneous bilateral surgery is cost effective, with both patient-specific and wider socioeconomic benefits. There are concerns however regarding higher complication rates with bilateral knee surgery. This study compares simultaneous bilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), to single side UKA in terms of complications and outcomes. This is a retrospective case-control study of single side medial UKA patients (controls) and simultaneous bilateral medial UKA patients (cases). All patients underwent surgery between 2018 and 2022 by a single surgeon. The two cohorts were compared for perioperative blood loss (PBL), length of stay (LOS), complications (infections, blood clots, wound problems), Oxford Knee Score improvement (OKS) and revision surgery, with a follow-up period of up to 5 years.Abstract
Introduction
Methodology
Compared to the standard Tomofix plate, the anatomical Tomofix medial high tibial (MHT) plate has been shown to improve anatomical fit and post correction tibial contour, following high tibial osteotomy (HTO). Clinical data on surgical complications, osteotomy union rates and survivorship with the anatomical Tomofix MHT plate however remain limited. This study reports mid-term results of HTO surgery, using the anatomical Tomofix MHT plate. All patients undergoing HTO surgery using the anatomical Tomofix MHT plate between 2017 and 2022 were included in the study. Data on complications, osteotomy union rates and survivorship were collected prospectively and retrospectively analysed.Abstract
Introduction
Methods
