header advert
Results 1 - 1 of 1
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Knee

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_IX | Pages 88 - 88
1 Mar 2012
Petheram T Jeavons R Jennings A
Full Access

Objective

To investigate the reasons for revision of Oxford Unicondylar Knee Replacement (UKR). Does insert size used relate to requirement for revision?

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the cases needing revision from a single surgeon consecutive series of 209 ‘Oxford’ UKRs. 10 cases required early (within 2 years) revision. The reasons for revision were investigated. A comparison of cases requiring revision by insert size implanted was made.