Triple-tapered cemented stems were developed in the hope that they would reduce aseptic loosening and prevent calcar bone loss. Between March 2005 and April 2008, a consecutive series of 415 primary C-stem AMT hip arthroplasties in 386 patients were performed under the care of three surgeons at our institution. When all the patients had reached the 5-year anniversary of surgery, functional questionnaires were sent out by mail. In the event of non-response, reminders were sent by post before the patients were contacted by telephone. Postoperative radiographs were also reviewed. Follow-up ranges from 60 to 99 months, with a mean of 76 months. 32 hips (8%) were lost to follow-up. The median OHS was 40, median SF-12 mental component score (MCS) was 50, and median SF-12 physical component score (PCS) was 39. Radiographic review showed that aseptic femoral component loosening has yet to be observed. At 99 months follow up, stem survivorship is 96.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 82.5 to 99.5). Adverse events such as calcar fracture, greater trochanter fracture and dislocation were rare at <1%. The C-stem AMT demonstrates excellent implant survivorship at 5–8 year follow-up, as well as good midterm functional outcome.
We compared the early complication rates of total hip (THA) and total knee (TKA) arthroplasty carried out at a regional orthopaedic hospital (AOC) and two Independent Sector Treatment Units (ISTUs) (WGH and CNH). After THA, reoperation rates were higher at CNH (9%) than AOC (0.6%) or WGH (1.4%). After TKA, reoperation rates at CNH were (8%) higher than AOC (1%) and WGH (1.9%). 5% of patients undergoing TKR at CNH underwent 2 stage revision for deep infection. After THA, dislocation rates at CNH (6%) were higher than AOC and WGH (1.8%). Readmission from CNH (13%) was higher than AOC (1.2%) and WGH (0.6%). Major wound problems at CNH (20%) were higher than WGH (3.8%) and AOC (0.4%). After TKA, major wound problems were higher at CNH (19%) compared to WGH (1.9%) and AOC (1.1%). Readmission rates not requiring surgery from CNH (13%) were higher than AOC. (1.1%) and WGH (1%). AOC and WGH audited their outcomes. None were available from CNH. WGH initially missed many of their complications because they presented at base hospitals elsewhere. ISTUs performed approximately 2/3rds of procedures for which patients had been referred from base hospitals. At CNH, 23% were rejected on grounds of potential co-morbidity. Audit from ISTUs is inferior to NHS hospitals and the results in one of those audited significantly worse. Patients offered surgery at ISTUs should be told that the audited outcome of the surgeon who will be treating them is not known and that, in some, results are inferior to surgery in the NHS.
Metal-on-metal resurfacing offers an alternative strategy to hip replacement in the young active patient with severe osteoarthritis of the hip. The aim of this study was to compare functional outcomes, failure rates and impending revisions in hybrid total hip arthroplasties (THAs) and Birmingham Hip Resurfacings (BHRs) in young active patients. We compared the 5-7 year clinical and radiological results of the metal-on-metal BHR with hybrid THA in two groups of 54 hips each, matched for sex, age, body mass index and activity. Function was excellent in both groups as measured by the Oxford hip score (median 13 in the BHRs and 14 in the THAs, p=0.14), but the resurfacings had higher UCLA activity scores (median 9 v 7, p=0.001) and better EuroQol quality of life scores (0.90 v 0.78, p=0.003). The THAs had a revision or intention to revise rate of 8% and the BHRs 6%. Both groups demonstrated impending failure on surrogate end-points. 12% of THAs had polyethylene wear and osteolysis under observation, and there was femoral component migration in 8% of resurfacings. Polyethylene wear was present in 48% of hybrid hips without osteolysis. Of the femoral components in the resurfacing group which had not migrated, 66% had radiological changes of unknown significance (classification proposed). In conclusion, the early to mid-term results of resurfacing with the BHR appear at least as good as those of hybrid THA. Only by longer term follow-up will we establish whether the change of practice recorded here represents a true advance.
