header advert
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 5, Issue 2 | Pages 109 - 116
8 Feb 2024
Corban LE van de Graaf VA Chen DB Wood JA Diwan AD MacDessi SJ

Aims

While mechanical alignment (MA) is the traditional technique in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), its potential for altering constitutional alignment remains poorly understood. This study aimed to quantify unintentional changes to constitutional coronal alignment and joint line obliquity (JLO) resulting from MA.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was undertaken of 700 primary MA TKAs (643 patients) performed between 2014 and 2017. Lateral distal femoral and medial proximal tibial angles were measured pre- and postoperatively to calculate the arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA), JLO, and Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) phenotypes. The primary outcome was the magnitude and direction of aHKA, JLO, and CPAK alterations.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 102-B, Issue 1 | Pages 117 - 124
1 Jan 2020
MacDessi SJ Griffiths-Jones W Chen DB Griffiths-Jones S Wood JA Diwan AD Harris IA

Aims

It is unknown whether kinematic alignment (KA) objectively improves knee balance in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), despite this being the biomechanical rationale for its use. This study aimed to determine whether restoring the constitutional alignment using a restrictive KA protocol resulted in better quantitative knee balance than mechanical alignment (MA).

Methods

We conducted a randomized superiority trial comparing patients undergoing TKA assigned to KA within a restrictive safe zone or MA. Optimal knee balance was defined as an intercompartmental pressure difference (ICPD) of 15 psi or less using a pressure sensor. The primary endpoint was the mean intraoperative ICPD at 10° of flexion prior to knee balancing. Secondary outcomes included balance at 45° and 90°, requirements for balancing procedures, and presence of tibiofemoral lift-off.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 86-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 93 - 93
1 Jan 2004
Diwan AD Khan SN Peterkin M Cammisa FP Sandhu HS Doty S Lane JM
Full Access

Nitric oxide (NO) is a free radical labile gas which has important physiological functions and is synthesised by the action of a group of enzymes called nitric oxide synthases (NOS) on L- arginine. We have shown that nitric oxide modulates fracture healing1. Bone morphogenic proteins (BMP) are potent differentiating factors that augment the process of new bone formation. Recombinant human BMP-2 (rhBMP-2) enhances spinal fusion2. With progression of fusion there is a remodelling of the fusion mass bone accompanied with a decrease in the fusion mass size. It is not known whether nitric oxide has a role in spinal fusion or rhBMP-2 enhanced spinal fusion.

We studied this in a novel rat intertransverse fusion model using a defined volume of bone graft (7 caudal vertebrae) along with 157 mm3 of absorbable Type-1 collagen sponge (Helistat®) carrier, which was compacted and delivered using a custom jig for achieving a similar graft density from sample to sample. The control groups consisted of a sham operated group (S, n=20), an autograft + carrier group (AC, n=28) and a group consisting of 43μg of rhBMP-2 (Genetics Institute, Andover, MA) mixed with autograft + carrier (ACB, n=28). Two experimental groups received a nitric oxide syn-thase (NOS) inhibitor, NG-nitro L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME, Sigma Chemicals, St Louis, MO) in a dose of 1mg/ml ad lib in the drinking water (ACL, n=28) and one of these experimental groups had rhBMP-2 added to the graft mixture at the time of surgery (ACLB, n=28). Rats were sacrificed at 22 days and 44 days, spinal columns dissected and subjected to high density radiology (faxitron) and decalcified histology. The faxitrons were subjected to image analysis (MetaMorph).

On a radiographic score (0–4) indicating progressive maturation of bone fusion mass, no difference was found between the AC and ACL groups, however, there was a significant enhancement of fusion when rhBMP-2 was added (ACB group,3.3±0.2) when compared to the AC group (1±0) (p< .001). However, on day 44, the ACLB group (3.3±0.2) showed significantly less fusion progression when compared to the ACB group (4±0) (p< 0.01). There was a 25% (p< 0.05) more fusion-mass-area in day 44 of ACLB group (297±26 mm3) when compared to day 44 of the ACB group (225±16 mm3) indicating that NOS inhibition delayed the remodelling of the fusion mass. Undecalcified histology demonstrated that there was a delay in graft incorporation whenever NOS was inhibited (ACL and ACLB groups).

Our results show that the biology of autograft spinal fusion and rhBMP-2 enhanced spinal fusion can be potentially manipulated by nitric oxide pathways.