To quantify and compare peri-acetabular bone mineral density
(BMD) between a monoblock acetabular component using a metal-on-metal
(MoM) bearing and a modular titanium shell with a polyethylene (PE)
insert. The secondary outcome was to measure patient-reported clinical
function. A total of 50 patients (25 per group) were randomised to MoM
or metal-on-polyethlene (MoP). There were 27 women (11 MoM) and
23 men (14 MoM) with a mean age of 61.6 years (47.7 to 73.2). Measurements
of peri-prosthetic acetabular and contralateral hip (covariate)
BMD were performed at baseline and at one and two years’ follow-up.
The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index
(WOMAC), University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score,
Harris hip score, and RAND-36 were also completed at these intervals.Objectives
Methods
Use of a large femoral head metal-on-metal bearing in total hip arthroplasty may offer an advantage in terms of dislocation rates and more natural joint kinematics. The acetabular component is more rigid however in these prostheses and if not placed accurately can lead to increased levels of metal ion release. A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted to quantify bone mineral density on the acetabular side, as well as compare metal ion levels from a standard metal-on-polyethylene bearing to a large head metal-on-metal bearing in primary total hip arthroplasty. Fifty patients were randomized to receive total hip arthroplasty with either the CONSERVE A-Class Total Hip with BFH femoral head or the Lineage acetabular component with polyethylene insert and cobalt chrome femoral head. There were 27 females (11 BFH) and 23 males (14 BFH), with a mean overall age of 61.6 (range 47.7–73.2). Serum levels of cobalt, chromium, and titanium were measured at regular intervals up to two years. Harris Hip Score, WOMAC, UCLA, and RAND-36 were completed at these same intervals. Standard radiographs as well as periprosthetic BMD were performed.Purpose
Method
