The “correct” rotational alignment and “normal” rotational alignment may not be the same position. Because of natural tibial plateau has average 3° varus but classical TKA method make tibial cut perpendicularly to tibial mechanical axis. Consequently femoral rotational compensation to 3° becomes necessary. While anatomical TKA method performed tibial cut in 3° varus. Then posterior femoral cut will be parallel to posterior condylar axis and component rotation theoretically should be aligned in natural anatomy. This study compares the rotational alignment between two methods.

Study conducted on 80 navigated TKAs with modified gap technique. Intraoperative femoral rotation retrieved from navigation. Rotational alignment was calculated using the Berger protocol with postoperative computerised tomography scanning. The alignment parameters measured were tibial and femoral component rotations and the combined component rotations.

57 knees with PS design can be classified into 35 knees as anatomical group and 22 knees as classical group. 23 knees with CR design had 12 knees as anatomical group and 11 knees as classical group. The intraoperative femoral rotation in anatomical group had less external rotation than classical group significantly in PS design (0.77°±1.03° vs 2.86°±1.49°, p = 0.00) and also had the same results in CR design (1.33°±1.37°vs 2.64°±0.81°, p = 0.012). However, the postoperative excessive femoral and tibial component rotation compared with native value and combined rotation had no significant differences between classical and anatomical method in both implant design.

Using CAS TKA with gap technique showed no difference in postoperative rotational alignment between classical and anatomical method.

Gap planning in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) navigation is critically concerned. Osteophyte is one of the contributing factors for gap balancing in TKA. The osteophyte is normally removed before gap planning step. However, the posterior condylar osteophyte of femur is sometimes removed during the flexion gap preparation or may not be removed at all depends on individual case. This study attempts to investigate on how posterior condylar osteophyte affects on gap balancing and limb alignment during operation.

The study was conducted on 35 varus osteoarthritis knees with posterior condylar osteophyte and undergone on TKA navigation. All knees were measured by CT scan for the size of posterior condylar osteophyte according to its width. Extension gap, flexion gap width, and limb alignment were measured by using the tension device with distraction force of 98 N on both medial and lateral sides under computer assisted surgery. The measuring of extension gap, flexion gap width, and limb alignment was undertaken before and after the posterior condylar osteophyte removal.

This study reveals that the mean of the size of posterior condylar osteophyte after removal is 8.96 mm. The posterior condylar osteophyte has an effect on the increasing of medial extension gap and lateral extension in average 0.74 ± 0.72 mm. and 0.42 ± 0.67 mm. respectively. It also increases 0.71 ± 1.00 mm. in medial flexion gap and 0.97 ± 1.47 mm. in lateral flexion gap. After the posterior condylar osteophyte removal the mean of varus deformity is decreased 0.90° ± 1.14 ° while the mean of extension angle of sagittal limb alignment is increased 1.61°±1.69°. There is also a significant relationship between the size of posterior condylar osteophyte and the increasing of lateral flexion gap and also with the varus deformity decreasing. If the size of posterior condylar osteophyte is increased 10 mm. the lateral flexion gap will be increased 1.15 mm. and varus deformity will be decreased 0.75 degree.