Deep infection represents one of the most devastating complications of total knee arthroplasty. Commonly implicated organisms are gram positive bacteria such as staphylococcus aureus, staphylococcus epidermidis and group B streptococcus. Occasionally, infection may be caused by rare organisms, particularly in the immunocompromised host.

We present a case of infected total knee arthroplasty in a penicillin allergic patient, caused by Pasteurella multocida, 13 weeks after the initial surgery. This was treated by open debridement and change of insert as well as aggressive antibiotic therapy. The patient admitted contact with a cat and three dogs at home.

Pasteurella multocida is a facultatively anaerobic gram negative coccobacillus. It is a commensal in the nasopharygeal tract of domestic pets such as cats and dogs. Human infection can often be attributed to a bite or scratch. Prosthetic joint infection caused by Pasteurella is uncommon. Only a few cases have been reported in the literature.

Our case has several learning points: (1) It is very important to definitively identify Pasteurella because standard therapy for prosthetic joint infection (e.g. flucloxacillin or vancomycin) is not optimal for this species.(2) Pasteurella are susceptible to penicillin, but the optimal antibiotic therapy for infections in patients allergic to beta lactam antibiotics is uncertain. A combination of ciprofloxacin and linezolid is recommended. (3) There is no consensus regarding appropriate management. There are reports of washout and antibiotic therapy alone, single and two stage revision procedures. In our case, at five months follow up, open debridement and change of insert along with antibiotic treatment appears to have been effective, although more long term follow up is required. (4)Post arthroplasty, all patients with pets at home should be advised to seek medical attention following any bite or scratch so that timely prophylaxis can be administered before sepsis becomes deep-seated.

Reconstruction of severe acetabular defects during revision hip arthroplasty presents a significant surgical challenge. Such defects are associated with significant loss of host bone stock, which must be addressed in order to achieve stable implant fixation. A number of imaging techniques including CT scanning with 3D image reconstruction are available to assist the surgeon in the pre-operative planning of such procedures.

We describe the use of a novel technique to assist the pre-operative planning of severe acetabular defects during revision hip arthroplasty.

Patient and Methods – We present the use of this technique in the case of a 78 year old patient who presented 20 years from index procedure with severe hip pain and inability to weight bear due aseptic loosening of a previously revised total hip arthroplasty. A Paprosky 3B defect was noted with intra-pelvic migration of the acetabular component. Pre-operative investigations included: inflammatory markers, pelvic CT scan with 3D reconstruction, pelvic angiography and hip aspiration.

Using DICOM images obtained from the CT scan, we used free open source software to carry out a 3D surface render of the bony pelvis. This was processed and converted to a suitable format for 3D printing. Using selective laser sintering, a physical 3D model of the pelvis, acetabular component and proximal femur were produced. Using this model the surgeon was able to gain an accurate representation of both the position of the intra-pelvic cup and more accurately assess the loss of bone stock. This novel technique is particularly useful in the pre-operative planning of such complex acetabular defects in order to determine if/which reconstruction technique is most likely to be successful.

3D printing is a relatively recent technology, which has numerous potential clinical applications. This is the first reported case of this technology being used to assess acetabular defects during revision hip arthroplasty. The use of this technology gives the surgeon a 3D model of the pelvis, quickly (7 days from CT) and at a tenth of the cost (£280) of producing such a model through the traditional commercial routes. The model allowed the surgeon to size potential implant, quantify the amount of bone graft required (if applicable) and to more accurately classify the loss of acetabular bone stock.